PreprintCited by 10Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesReproductive tract infections research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-throughput nanopore sequencing of Treponema pallidum tandem repeat genes arp and tp0470 reveals clade-specific patterns and recapitulates global whole genome phylogeny

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1007056 · Paper page

Abstract

Sequencing of most Treponema pallidum ( T. pallidum ) genomes excludes repeat regions in tp0470 and the tp0433 gene, encoding the acidic repeat protein ( arp ). As a first step to understanding the evolution and function of these genes and the proteins they encode, we developed a protocol to nanopore sequence tp0470 and arp genes from 212 clinical samples collected from ten countries on six continents. Both tp0470 and arp repeat structures recapitulate the whole genome phylogeny, with subclade-specific patterns emerging. The number of tp0470 repeats is on average appears to be higher in Nichols-like clade strains than in SS14-like clade strains. Consistent with previous studies, we found that 14-repeat arp sequences predominate across both major clades, but the combination and order of repeat type varies among subclades, with many arp sequence variants limited to a single subclade. Although strains that were closely related by whole genome sequencing frequently had the same arp repeat length, this was not always the case. Structural modelling of TP0470 suggested that the eight residue repeats form an extended α-helix, predicted to be periplasmic. Modeling of the ARP revealed a C-terminal sporulation-related repeat (SPOR) domain, predicted to bind denuded peptidoglycan, with repeat regions possibly incorporated into a highly charged β- sheet. Outside of the repeats, all TP0470 and ARP amino acid sequences were identical. Together, our data, along with functional considerations, suggests that both TP0470 and ARP proteins may be involved in T. pallidum cell envelope remodeling and homeostasis, with their highly plastic repeat regions playing as-yet-undetermined roles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.08.02.502389

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.245 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/s41564-021-01000-z · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/s41467-019-11216-7 · DOI
  4. 10.1128/JCM.44.3.888-891.2006 · DOI
  5. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001471 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04086.x · DOI
  7. 10.1128/IAI.01035-12 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/infdis/jiaa449 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/synbio/ysz025 · DOI
  10. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009949 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/s41596-021-00628-9 · DOI
  12. 10.1128/mBio.01153-18 · DOI
  13. 10.2340/00015555-1335 · DOI
  14. 10.1128/IAI.00360-15 · DOI
  15. 10.4049/jimmunol.0902788 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/molbev/msl092 · DOI
  17. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01691 · DOI
  18. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31826ae7a8 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2008.00427.x · DOI
  20. 10.1086/652239 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000123653.84940.59 · DOI
  22. 10.1186/s12900-018-0086-3 · DOI
  23. 10.1128/mBio.01006-18 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010063 · DOI
  26. 10.3389/fcimb.2020.618747 · DOI
  27. 10.1099/jmm.0.46943-0 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/nar/gkz991 · DOI
  29. 10.1056/NEJMoa040216 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1086/656533 · DOI
  31. 10.1128/IAI.73.7.4445-4450.2005 · DOI
  32. 10.1186/1471-2180-13-178 · DOI
  33. 10.1136/sti.2006.023895 · DOI
  34. 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001497 · DOI
  35. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004988 · DOI
  36. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001832 · DOI
  37. 10.1097/00007435-199809000-00004 · DOI
  38. 10.1128/JCM.40.1.256-258.2002 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.190 · DOI
  40. 10.1128/JCM.43.8.3743-3746.2005 · DOI
  41. 10.1128/IAI.02236-14 · DOI
  42. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009612 · DOI
  43. 10.1128/JB.187.5.1866-1874.2005 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.meegid.2018.03.015 · DOI
  45. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003261 · DOI
  46. 10.1086/320698 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00035-0 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/s41587-021-01156-3 · DOI
  49. 10.1128/msphere.00009-22 · DOI
  50. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181bd11dd · DOI
  51. 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1093/molbev/msz240 · DOI
  53. 10.1099/mgen.0.000132 · DOI
  54. 10.1186/s13059-019-1727-y · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 · DOI
  56. 10.1128/JB.00118-17 · DOI
  57. 10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1111/2041-210X.12628 · DOI
  59. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq249 · DOI
  60. 10.1093/bib/bbac222 · DOI
  61. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002172 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lieberman, N. A., Armstrong, T. D., Chung, B., Pfalmer, D., Hennelly, C. M., Haynes, A., Romeis, E., Wang, Q.-Q., Zhang, R.-L., Kou, C.-X., Ciccarese, G., Conte, I. D., Cusini, M., Drago, F., Nakayama, S.-I., Lee, K., Ohnishi, M., Konda, K. A., Vargas, S. K., Eguiluz, M., Caceres, C. F., Klausner, J. D., Mitja, O., Rompalo, A., Mulcahy, F., Hook, E. W., Hoffmann, I. F., Matoga, M. M., Zheng, H., Yang, B., Lopez-Medina, E., Ramirez, L. G., Radolf, J. D., Hawley, K. L., Salazar, J. C., Lukehart, S. A., Seña, A. C., Parr, J. B., Giacani, L., & Greninger, A. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
  • Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
  • National Institute of Infectious Diseases (JP)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (PE)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • St. James's Hospital (IE)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Southern Medical University (CN)
  • UConn Health (US)
  • Connecticut Children's Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Greninger, Alexander L
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-08-02
Volume
13
Pages
1007056-1007056
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4297906687
Cited by
10
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-036560)
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (21fk0108091j0303)
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (21K09388)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI144177, U19AI144133, R01AI139265)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
Treponema pallidum, nanopore sequencing, tandem repeat genes, ARP, whole-genome phylogeny, peptidoglycan binding, cell envelope remodeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review