The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multienzyme deep learning models improve peptide de novo sequencing by mass spectrometry proteomics
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010457 · Paper page
Abstract
Generating and analyzing overlapping peptides through multienzymatic digestion is an efficient procedure for de novo protein using from bottom-up mass spectrometry (MS). Despite improved instrumentation and software, de novo MS data analysis remains challenging. In recent years, deep learning models have represented a performance breakthrough. Incorporating that technology into de novo protein sequencing workflows require machine-learning models capable of handling highly diverse MS data. In this study, we analyzed the requirements for assembling such generalizable deep learning models by systematically varying the composition and size of the training set. We assessed the generated models’ performances using two test sets composed of peptides originating from the multienzyme digestion of samples from various species. The peptide recall values on the test sets showed that the deep learning models generated from a collection of highly N- and C-termini diverse peptides generalized 76% more over the termini-restricted ones. Moreover, expanding the training set’s size by adding peptides from the multienzymatic digestion with five proteases of several species samples led to a 2-3 fold generalizability gain. Furthermore, we tested the applicability of these multienzyme deep learning (MEM) models by fully de novo sequencing the heavy and light monomeric chains of five commercial antibodies (mAbs). MEM models extracted over 10000 matching and overlapped peptides across six different proteases mAb samples, achieving a 100% sequence coverage for 8 of the ten polypeptide chains. We foretell that the MEM models’ proven improvements to de novo analysis will positively impact several applications, such as analyzing samples of high complexity, unknown nature, or the peptidomics field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions
Alzubaidi, L., Zhang, J., Humaidi, A. J., Al-Dujaili, A., Duan, Y., Al-Shamma, O., Santamaría, J., Fadhel, M. A., Al-Amidie, M., & Farhan, L. (2021) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-021-00444-8 · Cited by 7,906
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 67
- 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.07.024 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature19949 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pmic.201800361 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/IAI.00462-21 · DOI
- 10.1128/mSystems.00271-21 · DOI
- 10.1369/0022155420988661 · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2021.808932 · DOI
- 10.3389/fgene.2020.612475 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-019-10583-5 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008169 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00430-020-00663-5 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-018-07986-1 · DOI
- 10.1074/mcp.M116.063966 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.joca.2021.09.006 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.64159 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100113 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00701 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms10261 · DOI
- 10.1074/mcp.T400003-MCP200 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00216-017-0772-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.03.031 · DOI
- 10.1038/nprot.2016.057 · DOI
- 10.1021/pr900863u · DOI
- 10.1074/mcp.TIR118.000918 · DOI
- 10.1074/mcp.TIR120.002129 · DOI
- 10.1080/14789450.2020.1831387 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1705691114 · DOI
- 10.1002/rcm.1196 · DOI
- 10.1021/ac0508853 · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbx033 · DOI
- 10.1089/106652799318300 · DOI
- 10.1021/pr3006843 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz366 · DOI
- 10.1021/ac048788h · DOI
- 10.1002/pmic.201900335 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature14539 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.11477/mf.1416201215 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2019.02.034 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2896880 · DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.48550/arxiv.1904.08514 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00608 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.013 · DOI
- 10.1021/ac4037679 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13361-013-0709-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/1044-0305(96)00019-0 · DOI
- 10.1021/ac0351163 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(199610)31:10<1156::AID-JMS407>3.0.CO;2-T · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141702 · DOI
- 10.1074/mcp.R112.026005 · DOI
- 10.1080/19420862.2015.1053683 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts480 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00860 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00799 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms6277 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/pr500202e · DOI
- 10.1002/pmic.201200439 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s13361-015-1179-x · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00860 · DOI
- 10.1021/pr0499491 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13361-016-1460-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pmic.200800473 · DOI
- 10.1101/2021.08.15.456425 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-020-0848-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkz403 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Gueto-Tettay, C., Tang, D., Happonen, L., Heusel, M., Khakzad, H., Malmström, J., & Malmström, L.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Malmström, Lars
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-08-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e1010457-e1010457
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9891523
- OpenAlex
- W4317556129
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (2016.0023)
- Vetenskapsrådet (2020-02419)
- Alfred Österlunds Stiftelse
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- de novo peptide sequencing, deep learning models, bottom-up mass spectrometry, training data size, model generalization, monoclonal antibodies, antibody heavy and light chains, overlapping peptides, peptidomics
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Peptide Hydrolases, Peptides, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Proteomics, Tandem Mass Spectrometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review