PreprintCited by 28Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsEnzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automatic and accurate ligand structure determination guided by cryo-electron microscopy maps

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-023-36732-5 · Paper page

Abstract

Advances in cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) and deep-learning guided protein structure prediction have expedited structural studies of protein complexes. However, methods for accurately determining ligand conformations are lacking. In this manuscript, we develop a tool for automatically determining ligand structures guided by medium-resolution cryoEM density. We show this method is robust at predicting ligands in maps as low as 6Å resolution, and is able to correct receptor sidechain errors. Combining this with a measure of placement confidence, and running on all protein/ligand structures in EMDB, we show that 58% of ligands replicate the deposited model, 16% confidently find alternate conformations, 22% have ambiguous density where multiple conformations might be present, and 4% are incorrectly placed. For five cases where our approach finds an alternate conformation with high confidence, high-resolution crystal structures validate our placement. This tool and the resulting analysis should prove critical in using cryoEM to investigate protein-ligand complexes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.08.16.504149

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1038/s41586-020-2833-4 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/s41586-020-2829-0 · DOI
  3. 10.1107/S2052252520006855 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nmeth.3287 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/pro.3740 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/s41467-018-04053-7 · DOI
  7. 2021, Full-length de novo protein structure determination from cryo-EM maps using deep learning, Bioinformatics, 37, 3480, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab357 · DOI
  8. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 2004, Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics, Acta Cryst, D60, 2126
  10. 2001, X-LIGAND: an application for the automated addition of flexible ligands into electron density, Acta Cryst, D57, 696
  11. 2004, Modelling bound ligands in protein crystal structures, Acta Cryst, D60, 2230
  12. 2006, Automated ligand fitting by core-fragment fitting and extension into density, Acta Cryst, D62, 915
  13. 2007, Assessment of automatic ligand building in ARP/wARP, Acta Cryst, D63, 108
  14. 2020, GemSpot: A pipeline for robust modeling of ligands into cryo-EM maps, Structure, 28, 707, 10.1016/j.str.2020.04.018 · DOI
  15. 2020, Flexible fitting of small-molecules into electron microscopy maps using molecular dynamics simulations with neural network potentials, J. Chem. Inf. Model, 60, 2591, 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b01167 · DOI
  16. 2021, Force field optimization guided by small molecule crystal lattice data enables consistent sub-angstrom protein–ligand docking, J. Chem. Theory Comput, 17, 2000, 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01184 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/nar/gkv1126 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/s41586-021-03540-0 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/nature08624 · DOI
  20. 2021, Gating and modulation of a hetero-octameric AMPA glutamate receptor, Nature, 594, 454, 10.1038/s41586-021-03613-0 · DOI
  21. 2021, Structure of PDE3A-SLFN12 complex reveals requirements for activation of SLFN12 RNase, Nat. Commun, 12, 4375, 10.1038/s41467-021-24495-w · DOI · Paper page
  22. 2021, Structural basis for aggregate dissolution and refolding by the Mycobacterium tuberculosis ClpB-DnaK bi-chaperone system, Cell Rep, 35, 109166, 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109166 · DOI
  23. 10.1042/BJ20111221 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/s41594-019-0334-7 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1038/s41594-021-00596-4 · DOI
  26. 10.1073/pnas.1707304114 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 2020, Cryo-EM structures of a gonococcal multidrug efflux pump illuminate a mechanism of drug recognition and resistance, mBio, 11, e00996
  28. 10.1038/s41467-021-23496-z · DOI
  29. 10.1021/bi0025464 · DOI
  30. 10.1021/bi035296a · DOI
  31. 10.1074/jbc.M106659200 · DOI
  32. 10.1042/BJ20061062 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108208 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.027 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.09.029 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.028 · DOI
  37. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01234 · DOI
  38. 10.1073/pnas.2106750118 · DOI
  39. 10.1126/science.abd3255 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/s00775-008-0404-5 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1038/nmeth.4340 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.str.2018.09.006 · DOI
  43. 2009, electronic Ligand Builder and Optimization Workbench (eLBOW): a tool for ligand coordinate and restraint generation, Acta Cryst, D65, 1074
  44. 2006, A. Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations, Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, 25, 247260
  45. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(20000130)21:2<132::AID-JCC5>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
  46. 1974, Three-dimensional pattern recognition: An approach to automated interpretation of electron density maps of proteins, J. Mol. Bio, 82, 279, 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90591-9 · DOI
  47. 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
  48. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag New York (2016). https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Muenks, A., Zepeda, S., Zhou, G., Veesler, D., & DiMaio, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
DiMaio, Frank
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-08-17
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
1164-1164
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4322733414
Cited by
28
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (T32GM008268, 1762114)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1156262)
  • University of Washington (1762114)
  • Fast Grants
  • Defense Threat Reduction Agency (GRANT13030960)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (DGE-1762114, T32GM008268, R01GM123089)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (DP1AI158186, 75N93022C00036, DP1AI158186 and 75N93022C00036, F31AI174573, OPP1156262)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
cryo-electron microscopy maps, protein-ligand complex, emerald, protein structure prediction
MeSH terms
Ligands, Mental Processes, Running, Cryoelectron Microscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review