The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine Learning Optimization of Candidate Antibodies Yields Highly Diverse Sub-nanomolar Affinity Antibody Libraries
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-023-39022-2 · Paper page
Abstract
Therapeutic antibodies are an important and rapidly growing drug modality. However, the design and discovery of early-stage antibody therapeutics remain a time and cost-intensive endeavor. In this work, we present an end-to-end Bayesian, language model-based method for designing large and diverse libraries of high-affinity single-chain variable fragments (scFvs). We integrate target-specific binding affinities with information from millions of natural protein sequences in a probabilistic machine learning framework to design thousands of scFvs that are then empirically measured. In a head-to-head comparison with a directed evolution approach, we show that the best scFv generated from our method represents a 28.8-fold improvement in binding over the best scFv from the directed evolution. Additionally, 99% of the designed scFvs in our most successful library are improvements over the initial candidate scFv. By comparing a library’s predicted success to actual measurements, we demonstrate our method’s ability to explore tradeoffs between library success and diversity during the design phase and prior to experimental testing. The results of our work highlight the significant impact machine learning models can have on scFv development. We expect our end-to-end method to be broadly applicable and able to provide value to other protein engineering tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- 10.1002/anie.201708408 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-020-0512-5 · DOI
- 10.1080/19420862.2017.1290753 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1616408114 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.04.007 · DOI
- 10.1093/protein/gzq061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0105954 · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, Evaluating Protein Transfer Learning with TAPE, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 32, 9689
- 10.1016/j.cels.2021.05.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0598-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.48550/arXiv.1902.08661 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.48550/arXiv.2203.06125 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00237 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz895 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.021 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41551-021-00699-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41598-021-85274-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-021-22732-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.2122954119 · DOI · Paper page
- A. Vaswani et al., “Attention is All you Need,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, vol. 30. Accessed: May 11, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Abstract.html
- 10.18653/v1/N19-1423 · DOI · Paper page
- Engelhart, Emily et al., “A dataset comprised of binding interactions for 104,972 antibodies against a SARS-CoV-2 peptide,” Scientific Data, (In press).
- 10.1093/nar/gky995 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4049/jimmunol.1800708 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.48550/arXiv.2210.02881 · DOI
- “High-throughput characterization of protein–protein interactions by reprogramming yeast mating | PNAS.” https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1705867114 (accessed Jun. 07, 2022). · DOI
- 10.1007/s11042-020-10139-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02736129 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12064-012-0170-3 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/elps.11501401163 · DOI
- 10.1002/elps.1150150171 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, L., Gupta, E., Spaeth, J., Shing, L., Jaimes, R., Caceres, R. S., Bepler, T., & Walsh, M. E.
- Affiliations
- MIT Lincoln Laboratory (US)
- New York Structural Biology Center (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Lin
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-10-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3454-3454
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10258481
- OpenAlex
- W4380321714
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 9
- FWCI
- 15.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- antibody design, scFv, scFv library, Bayesian optimization, language models, library diversity, binding affinity, directed evolution, protein engineering, therapeutic antibodies, machine learning optimization
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Bayes Theorem, Language, Gene Library, Single-Chain Antibodies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review