The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Challenges in antibody structure prediction
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1080/19420862.2023.2175319 · Paper page
Abstract
The tremendous advances in structural biology and the exponential increase of high-quality experimental structures available in the PDB motivated numerous studies to tackle the grand challenge of predicting protein structures. AlphaFold2 revolutionized the field of protein structure prediction, by combining artificial intelligence with evolutionary information. Antibodies are one of the most important classes of biotherapeutic proteins. Accurate structure models are a prerequisite to advance biophysical property predictions and consequently antibody design. Various specialized tools are available to predict antibody structures based on different principles and profiting from current advances in protein structure prediction based on artificial intelligence. Here, we want to emphasize the importance of reliable protein structure models and highlight the enormous advances in the field. At the same time, we want to raise the awareness that protein structure models—and in particular antibody models—may suffer from structural inaccuracies, namely incorrect cis-amid bonds, wrong stereochemistry or clashes. We show that these inaccuracies affect biophysical property predictions such as surface hydrophobicity. Thus, we stress the significance of carefully reviewing protein structure models before investing further computing power and setting up experiments. To facilitate the assessment of model quality, we provide a tool “TopModel” to validate structure models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- 10.1016/S1367-5931(00)00164-2 · DOI
- 1999, Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 37, 171, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(1999)37:3+<171::AID-PROT21>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
- 1995, A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 23, ii, 10.1002/prot.340230303 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.07.016 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Applying and improving AlphaFold at CASP14, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 89, 1711, 10.1002/prot.26257 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, ABlooper: fast accurate antibody CDR loop structure prediction with accuracy estimation, Bioinformatics, 38, 1877, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac016 · DOI · Paper page
- Ruffolo JA , Chu L-S , Mahajan SP , Gray JJ. Fast, accurate antibody structure prediction from deep learning on massive set of natural antibodies. bioRxiv 2022; :2022.04.20.488972. · DOI
- 2022, Antibody structure prediction using interpretable deep learning, Patterns, 3, 100406, 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100406 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, The case for post-predictional modifications in the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 28, 869, 10.1038/s41594-021-00680-9 · DOI
- Evans R , O’Neill M , Pritzel A , Antropova N , Senior A , Green T , Žídek A , Bates R , Blackwell S , Yim J , et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv 2022; :2021.10.04.463034. · DOI · Paper page
- 2003, V(D)J Recombination and the Evolution of the Adaptive Immune System, PLoS Biology, 1, e16, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000016 · DOI
- 2019, Antibody Structure and Function: The Basis for Engineering Therapeutics, Antibodies (Basel), 8, 55, 10.3390/antib8040055 · DOI
- Guest JD , Vreven T , Zhou J , Moal I , Jeliazkov JR , Gray JJ , Weng Z , Pierce BG. An expanded benchmark for antibody-antigen docking and affinity prediction reveals insights into antibody recognition determinants. Structure [Internet] 2021; Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969212621000058 · DOI
- Fernández-Quintero ML , Vangone A , Loeffler JR , Seidler CA , Georges G , Liedl KR. Paratope states in solution improve structure prediction and docking. Structure [Internet] 2021; Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969212621004135 · DOI
- 2020, Antibodies exhibit multiple paratope states influencing VH–VL domain orientations, Communications Biology, 3, 589, 10.1038/s42003-020-01319-z · DOI
- 10.1007/s13238-013-3903-2 · DOI
- 2021, Topological and Structural Plasticity of the Single Ig Fold and the Double Ig Fold Present in CD19, Biomolecules, 11, 1290, 10.3390/biom11091290 · DOI
- 1982, Evolution of proteins formed by β-sheets: II, The core of the immunoglobulin domains. Journal of Molecular Biology, 160, 325
- 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80102-0 · DOI
- 10.1093/protein/gzn077 · DOI
- Abanades B , Wong WK , Boyles F , Georges G , Bujotzek A , Deane CM. ImmuneBuilder: Deep-Learning models for predicting the structures of immune proteins. bioRxiv 2022; :2022.11.04.514231. · DOI
- Waibl F , Fernández-Quintero Ml , Wedl FS , Kettenberger H , Georges G , Liedl KR. Comparison of hydrophobicity scales for predicting biophysical properties of antibodies. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences [Internet] 2022; 9. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2022.960194 · DOI
- 2021, Conformational Ensembles of Antibodies Determine Their Hydrophobicity, Biophysical Journal, 120, 143, 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.11.010 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1616408114 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Highly protective antimalarial antibodies via precision library generation and yeast display screening, Journal of Experimental Medicine, 219, e20220323, 10.1084/jem.20220323 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsb1096-842 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-12-190 · DOI
- 2021, Protein Structure Prediction: Conventional and Deep Learning Perspectives, The Protein Journal, 40, 522, 10.1007/s10930-021-10003-y · DOI
- 2022, Different methods, techniques and their limitations in protein structure prediction: A review, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 173, 72, 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2022.05.002 · DOI
- Lin Z , Akin H , Rao R , Hie B , Zhu Z , Lu W , Santos Costa A dos , Fazel-Zarandi M , Sercu T , Candido S , et al. Language models of protein sequences at the scale of evolution enable accurate structure prediction. bioRxiv 2022; :2022.07.20.500902.
- 10.1080/19420862.2016.1205773 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90412-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, CDR-H3 loop ensemble in solution – conformational selection upon antibody binding, null, 11, 1077
- 10.1002/prot.25291 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg299 · DOI
- 2020, SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Fernández-Quintero, M. L., Kokot, J., Waibl, F., Fischer, A.-L. M., Quoika, P. K., Deane, C. M., & Liedl, K. R.
- Affiliations
- Universität Innsbruck (AT)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Liedl, Klaus R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- mAbs
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-11-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2175319-2175319
- ISSN
- 1942-0862 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9928471
- OpenAlex
- W4320495379
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10
- FWCI
- 4.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- mAbs (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (11985)
- Partnership for Advanced Computing in Europe AISBL
- Austrian Science Fund (11985, P34518)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Keywords
- antibody structure prediction, protein structure model, structural accuracy, steric clashes, surface hydrophobicity, antibody design, model validation, TOPMODEL, AlphaFold2
- MeSH terms
- Antibodies, Artificial Intelligence, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review