PreprintCited by 2Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of a covert evolutionary pathway between two protein folds

Open access
Chakravarty, Devlina, Sreenivasan, Shwetha, Swint-Kruse, Liskin, Porter, Lauren L.·2022·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-023-38519-0 · Paper page

Abstract

Although homologous protein sequences are expected to adopt similar structures, some amino acid substitutions can interconvert α-helices and β-sheets. Such fold switching may have occurred over evolutionary history, but supporting evidence has been limited by the: (1) abundance and diversity of sequenced genes, (2) quantity of experimentally determined protein structures, and (3) assumptions underlying the statistical methods used to infer homology. Here, we overcame these barriers by applying multiple statistical methods to a family of ~600,000 bacterial response regulator proteins. We found that their homologous DNA-binding subunits assume divergent structures: helix-turn-helix versus α-helix+β-sheet (winged helix). Phylogenetic analyses, ancestral sequence reconstruction, and AlphaFold2 models indicated that amino acid substitutions facilitated a switch from helix-turn-helix into winged helix. This structural transformation likely expanded DNA-binding specificity. Our approach uncovers an evolutionary pathway between two protein folds and provides methodology to identify secondary structure switching in other protein families.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.12.08.519646

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 86

  1. 10.1126/science.181.4096.223 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1371/journal.pone.0083502PONE-D-13-35198 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.abf8761 · DOI
  4. 10.1126/science.273.5280.1386 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/ng0694-169 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/ncb2641 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(199602)24:2<145::AID-PROT1>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI
  8. 10.1021/bi00107a010 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/0471721204.ch13 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/nar/gkm993 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/nar/gkl959 · DOI
  12. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1021/acschembio.8b00276 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.1800168115 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.02.012 · DOI
  16. 10.1126/science.1260031 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1073/pnas.0906408106 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.str.2011.11.018 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/molbev/msab240 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/nchembio.1579 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/pro.3488 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.str.2004.02.024 · DOI
  23. 10.1073/pnas.0711589105 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/nar/gkv1189 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1107/S0907444902003451 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7000-1_26 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1093/nar/gky448 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1038/nmeth.1818 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026297 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.mib.2010.01.005 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/337745a0 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.1302819110 · DOI
  33. 10.1126/scisignal.aaq0825 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.tibs.2007.03.002 · DOI
  35. 10.1128/JB.01887-05 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.008 · DOI
  37. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1002/bip.23416 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/nar/gkp1219 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.021 · DOI
  41. 2009, A new generation of homology search tools based on probabilistic inference, Genome Inform, 23, 205
  42. 10.1038/msb.2011.75 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/nar/gkh340 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1080/10635150290069913 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1002/pro.4353 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1038/s41467-022-31532-9 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/protein/12.2.85 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1093/nar/gkh121 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1002/pro.2071 · DOI
  50. 10.1073/pnas.0912616107 · DOI
  51. 10.7554/eLife.09410 · DOI
  52. 10.1093/molbev/msab017 · DOI
  53. 10.1073/pnas.1707642114 · DOI
  54. 10.1002/pro.4407 · DOI
  55. 10.1073/pnas.0700922104 · DOI
  56. 10.1126/science.abd8700 · DOI
  57. 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4335 · DOI
  58. 10.1126/science.aah4043 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1186/s12859-018-2524-4 · DOI
  61. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm017 · DOI
  63. 10.1093/nar/gkw408 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1002/prot.24948 · DOI
  65. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.10.935 · DOI
  66. 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.8.707 · DOI
  67. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1093/molbev/msh194 · DOI
  69. 10.1093/molbev/msp077 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1093/bioinformatics/8.3.275 · DOI
  72. Stamatakis, A. in Proceedings 20th IEEE international parallel & distributed processing symposium. 8 pp. (IEEE).
  73. 10.1093/molbev/msx281 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1093/molbev/msu300 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1038/nmeth.4285 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1093/sysbio/syab067 · DOI
  77. 10.1007/BF02109483 · DOI
  78. 10.1007/BF02100115 · DOI
  79. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026201 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1098/rspb.2001.1862 · DOI
  81. 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1641 · DOI
  82. 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti511 · DOI
  84. 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.21105/joss.03021 · DOI · Paper page
  86. 2017, ggtree: an R package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 28, 10.1111/2041-210X.12628 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Chakravarty, D., Sreenivasan, S., Swint-Kruse, L., & Porter, L. L.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Porter, Lauren L.
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-12-12
OpenAlex
W4311213469
Cited by
2
References
4
Citations by year
2023: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • W. M. Keck Foundation (GM118589)
  • National Institutes of Health (LM202011)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM118589, GM118589)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (LM202011)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
protein fold evolution, fold switching, helix-turn-helix, DNA-binding proteins, ancestral sequence reconstruction, phylogenetic analysis, AlphaFold2, DNA binding specificity, homology inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review