The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engineered Immunogens to Elicit Antibodies Against Conserved Coronavirus Epitopes
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-023-43638-9
Abstract
Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 primarily target the receptor binding domain of the spike protein, which continually mutates to escape acquired immunity. Other regions in the spike S2 subunit, such as the stem helix and the segment encompassing residues 815-823 adjacent to the fusion peptide, are highly conserved across sarbecoviruses and are recognized by broadly reactive antibodies, providing hope that vaccines targeting these epitopes could offer protection against both current and emergent viruses. Here we employed computational modeling to design scaffolded immunogens that display the spike 815-823 peptide and the stem helix epitopes without the distracting and immunodominant RBD. These engineered proteins bound with high affinity and specificity to the mature and germline versions of previously identified broadly protective human antibodies. Epitope scaffolds interacted with both sera and isolated monoclonal antibodies with broadly reactivity from individuals with pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 immunity. When used as immunogens, epitope scaffolds elicited sera with broad betacoronavirus reactivity and protected as “boosts” against live virus challenge in mice, illustrating their potential as components of a future pancoronavirus vaccine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.037 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03324-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/sciimmunol.abi6950 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2456-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010951 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chom.2022.11.012 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abq3773 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abq2679 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abj3321 · DOI
- 10.1126/scitranslmed.abi9215 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.03.028 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chom.2022.10.010 · DOI
- Zhou, P. et al. Broadly neutralizing anti-S2 antibodies protect against all three human betacoronaviruses that cause severe disease. (Immunology, 2022). · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1209368 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.str.2010.06.010 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1004728107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1004728107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/685867 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.021 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.add2187 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.chom.2022.10.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.02.014 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsnano.8b02805 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03594-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fimmu.2021.637651 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.10.003 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.add2187 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.24641 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2010.06.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.04.044 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature12966 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat0381 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.add6502 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.02.005 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-022-33985-4 · DOI
- 10.1126/scitranslmed.abj7125 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444910048675 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444913000061 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444906045975 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444904019158 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1107/S2059798318002425 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444909052925 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.02.014 · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00170 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abm3425 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/cyto.a.24552 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0173778 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.42166 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1517719113 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Kapingidza, B., Marston, D. J., Harris, C., Wrapp, D., Winters, K., Mielke, D., Xiaozhi, L., Yin, Q., Foulger, A., Parks, R., Barr, M., Newman, A., Schäfer, A., Eaton, A., Flores, J. M., Harner, A., Cantazaro, N. J., Mallory, M. L., Mattocks, M. D., Beverly, C., Rhodes, B., Mansouri, K., Itallie, E. V., Vure, P., Manness, B., Keyes, T., Stanfield-Oakley, S., Woods, C. W., Petzold, E. A., Walter, E. B., Wiehe, K., Edwards, R. J., Montefiori, D., Ferrari, G., Baric, R., Cain, D. W., Saunders, K. O., Haynes, B. F., & Azoitei, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Azoitei, Mihai L.
- ORCID
- Marston, Daniel J.
- Harris, Caitlin
- Wrapp, Daniel
- Mielke, Dieter
- Barr, Maggie
- Newman, Amanda
- Schäfer, Alexandra
- Eaton, Amanda
- Mallory, Michael L
- Mattocks, Melissa D
- Rhodes, Brianna
- Mansouri, Katayoun
- Stanfield-Oakley, Sherry
- Woods, Christopher W.
- Petzold, Elizabeth A.
- Walter, Emmanuel B
- Wiehe, Kevin
- Edwards, Robert J.
- Montefiori, David
- Ferrari, Guido
- Baric, Ralph
- Cain, Derek W.
- Saunders, Kevin O.
- Haynes, Barton F.
- Azoitei, Mihai L.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-02-28
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7897-7897
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10689493
- OpenAlex
- W4389183324
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 5.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (Contract No. W-31-109-Eng-38, W - 31 - 109 - Eng - 38)
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (R01AI155804, P01AI158571)
- Office of Science (W-31-109-ENG-38)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI155804, P01AI158571, T32AI007392)
- Basic Energy Sciences (W-31-109-Eng38)
- Argonne National Laboratory (W-31-109-ENG-38)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
- Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2, spike protein, conserved epitopes, broadly neutralizing antibodies, fusion peptide, receptor binding domain, monoclonal antibodies, vaccine design, betacoronaviruses, antibody escape
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review