The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of protein assemblies by structure sampling followed by interface-focused scoring
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/prot.26569 · Paper page
Abstract
Proteins often function as part of permanent or transient multimeric complexes, and understanding function of these assemblies requires knowledge of their three-dimensional structures. While the ability of AlphaFold to predict structures of individual proteins with unprecedented accuracy has revolutionized structural biology, modeling structures of protein assemblies remains challenging. To address this challenge, we developed a protocol for predicting structures of protein complexes involving model sampling followed by scoring focused on the subunit-subunit interaction interface. In this protocol, we diversified AlphaFold models by varying construction and pairing of multiple sequence alignments as well as increasing the number of recycles. In cases when AlphaFold failed to assemble a full protein complex or produced unreliable results, additional diverse models were constructed by docking of monomers or subcomplexes. All the models were then scored using a newly developed method, VoroIF-jury, which relies only on structural information. Notably, VoroIF-jury is independent of AlphaFold self-assessment scores and therefore can be used to rank models originating from different structure prediction methods. We tested our protocol in CASP15 and obtained top results, significantly outperforming the standard AlphaFold-Multimer pipeline. Analysis of our results showed that the accuracy of our assembly models was capped mainly by structure sampling rather than model scoring. This observation suggests that better sampling, especially for the antibody-antigen complexes, may lead to further improvement. Our protocol is expected to be useful for modeling and/or scoring protein assemblies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- 2021, Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XIV, Proteins, 89, 1607, 10.1002/prot.26237 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome, Nature, 596, 590, 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all, Nat Methods, 19, 679, 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Evans R , O’Neill M , Pritzel A , Antropova N , Senior A , Green T , Žídek dek A , Bates R , Blackwell S , Yim J , Ronneberger O , Bodenstein S , Zielinski M , Bridgland A , Potapenko A , Cowie A , Tunyasuvunakool K , Jain R , Clancy E , Kohli P , Jumper J , Hassabis D. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv 2022:2021.10.04.463034. · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Benchmarking AlphaFold for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants, Protein Sci, 31, e4379, 10.1002/pro.4379 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-022-33729-4 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa946 · DOI
- 2020, MGnify: the microbiome analysis resource in 2020, Nucleic Acids Res, 48, D570
- UniProt Consortium, 2023, UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023, Nucleic Acids Res, 51, D523, 10.1093/nar/gkac1052 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkv1189 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1203 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000501)39:2<178::AID-PROT8>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI
- 2016, Spherical polar Fourier assembly of protein complexes with arbitrary point group symmetry, J Appl Cryst, 49, 158, 10.1107/S1600576715022931 · DOI
- CASP-COVID participants, 2021, Modeling SARS-CoV-2 proteins in the CASP-commons experiment, Proteins, 89, 1987, 10.1002/prot.26231 · DOI
- 2017, VoroMQA: Assessment of protein structure quality using interatomic contact areas, Proteins, 85, 1131, 10.1002/prot.25278 · DOI
- 2020, Contact Area-Based Structural Analysis of Proteins and Their Complexes Using CAD-Score, Methods Mol Biol, 2112, 75, 10.1007/978-1-0716-0270-6_6 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005659 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, COMER2: GPU-accelerated sensitive and specific homology searches, Bioinformatics, 36, 3570, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa185 · DOI
- 2023, The COMER web server for protein analysis by homology, Bioinformatics, 39, btac807, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac807 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac387 · DOI
- 2017, The PPI3D web server for searching, analyzing and modeling protein-protein interactions in the context of 3D structures, Bioinformatics, 33, 935, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw756 · DOI
- 2021, RCSB Protein Data Bank: powerful new tools for exploring 3D structures of biological macromolecules for basic and applied research and education in fundamental biology, biomedicine, biotechnology, bioengineering and energy sciences, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, D437, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1038 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Template-Based Modeling of Protein Complexes Using the PPI3D Web Server, Methods Mol Biol, 2165, 139, 10.1007/978-1-0716-0708-4_8 · DOI
- 2021, Modeling of protein complexes in CASP14 with emphasis on the interaction interface prediction, Proteins, 89, 1834, 10.1002/prot.26167 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu744 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.25408 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, US-align: universal structure alignments of proteins, nucleic acids, and macromolecular complexes, Nat Methods, 19, 1109, 10.1038/s41592-022-01585-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, Structural modeling of protein complexes: Current capabilities and challenges, Proteins, 87, 1222, 10.1002/prot.25774 · DOI
- 2021, Assessment of the CASP14 assembly predictions, Proteins, 89, 1787, 10.1002/prot.26199 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Prediction of protein assemblies, the next frontier: The CASP14-CAPRI experiment, Proteins, 89, 1800, 10.1002/prot.26222 · DOI
- 2021, Nonameric structures of the cytoplasmic domain of FlhA and SctV in the context of the full-length protein, PLoS One, 16, e0252800, 10.1371/journal.pone.0252800 · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00302 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Application of docking methodologies to modeled proteins, Proteins, 88, 1180, 10.1002/prot.25889 · DOI
- 2020, Computational approaches to therapeutic antibody design: established methods and emerging trends, Brief Bioinform, 21, 1549, 10.1093/bib/bbz095 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Advances in computational structure-based antibody design, Curr Opin Struct Biol, 74, 102379, 10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102379 · DOI
- 2021, An expanded benchmark for antibody-antigen docking and affinity prediction reveals insights into antibody recognition determinants, Structure, 29, 606, 10.1016/j.str.2021.01.005 · DOI
- Wallner B. AFsample: Improving Multimer Prediction with AlphaFold using Aggressive Sampling. bioRxiv; 2022. p 2022.12.20.521205. · DOI
- Wu R , Ding F , Wang R , Shen R , Zhang X , Luo S , Su C , Wu Z , Xie Q , Berger B , Ma J , Peng J. High-resolution de novo structure prediction from primary sequence. bioRxiv; 2022. p 2022.07.21.500999. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- Lin Z , Akin H , Rao R , Hie B , Zhu Z , Lu W , Smetanin N , Verkuil R , Kabeli O , Shmueli Y , Costa A dos S , Fazel-Zarandi M , Sercu T , Candido S , Rives A. Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model. bioRxiv; 2022. p 2022.07.20.500902. · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Olechnovič, K., Valančauskas, L., Dapkūnas, J., & Venclovas, Č.
- Affiliations
- Vilnius University (LT)
- Venue
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-03-08
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1724-1733
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4385798891
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba (S-MIP-21-35)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- protein complex structure prediction, protein assembly, AlphaFold, subunit-subunit interface, model ranking, immune complexes, multimeric complexes, CASP15
- MeSH terms
- Proteins, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review