PreprintCited by 18Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ProtWave-VAE: Integrating autoregressive sampling with latent-based inference for data-driven protein design

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00261 · Paper page

Abstract

Deep generative models (DGMs) have shown great success in the understanding of data-driven design of proteins. Variational autoencoders (VAEs) are a popular DGM approach that can learn the correlated patterns of amino acid mutations within a multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of protein sequences and distill this information into a low-dimensional latent space to expose phylogenetic and functional relationships and guide generative protein design. Autoregressive (AR) models are another popular DGM approach that typically lack a low-dimensional latent embedding but do not require training sequences to be aligned into an MSA and enable the design of variable length proteins. In this work, we propose ProtWave-VAE as a novel and lightweight DGM employing an information maximizing VAE with a dilated convolution encoder and autoregressive WaveNet decoder. This architecture blends the strengths of the VAE and AR paradigms in enabling training over unaligned sequence data and the conditional generative design of variable length sequences from an interpretable low-dimensional learned latent space. We evaluate the model’s ability to infer patterns and design rules within alignment-free homologous protein family sequences and to design novel synthetic proteins in four diverse protein families. We show that our model can infer meaningful functional and phylogenetic embeddings within latent spaces and make highly accurate predictions within semi-supervised downstream fitness prediction tasks. In an application to the C-terminal SH3 domain in the Sho1 transmembrane osmosensing receptor in baker’s yeast, we subject ProtWave-VAE designed sequences to experimental gene synthesis and select-seq assays for osmosensing function to show that the model enables de novo generative design, conditional C-terminus diversification, and engineering of osmosensing function into SH3 paralogs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.04.23.537971

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.04.004 · DOI
  2. 2021, 100th anniversary of macromolecular science view-point: data-driven protein design, ACS Macro Letters, 10, 327, 10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00885 · DOI
  3. 2022, Protein design via deep learning, Briefings in Bioinformatics, 23, bbac102, 10.1093/bib/bbac102 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2021, Data-driven computational protein design, Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 69, 63, 10.1016/j.sbi.2021.03.009 · DOI
  5. 2020, Deep dive into machine learning models for protein engineering, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 60, 2773, 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00073 · DOI
  6. 2019, Unified rational protein engineering with sequence-based deep representation learning, Nature Methods, 16, 1315, 10.1038/s41592-019-0598-1 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2021, Protein design and variant prediction using autoregressive generative models, Nature Communications, 12, 2403, 10.1038/s41467-021-22732-w · DOI · Paper page
  8. Madani, A. ; Krause, B. ; Greene, E. R. ; Subramanian, S. ; Mohr, B. P. ; Holton, J. M. ; Olmos Jr, J. L. ; Xiong, C. ; Sun, Z. Z. ; Socher, R. ; Fraser, J. S. ; Naik, N . Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families. Nature Biotechnology 2023, 1–8. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Notin, P. ; Dias, M. ; Frazer, J. ; Hurtado, J. M. ; Gomez, A. N. ; Marks, D. ; Gal, Y . Tranception: protein fitness prediction with autoregressive transformers and inference-time retrieval. International Conference on Machine Learning. 2022; pp 16990–17017.
  10. 2022, ProtGPT2 is a deep unsupervised language model for protein design, Nature Communications, 13, 4348, 10.1038/s41467-022-32007-7 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 2021, Prottrans: Toward understanding the language of life through self-supervised learning, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 44, 7112
  12. 2019, Deciphering protein evolution and fitness landscapes with latent space models, Nature Communications, 10, 5644, 10.1038/s41467-019-13633-0 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 2018, Deep generative models of genetic variation capture the effects of mutations, Nature Methods, 15, 816, 10.1038/s41592-018-0138-4 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1101/2022.12.21.521443 · DOI
  15. 2022, Therapeutic enzyme engineering using a generative neural network, Scientific Reports, 12, 1536, 10.1038/s41598-022-05195-x · DOI
  16. Costello, Z. ; Martin, H. G . How to hallucinate functional proteins. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.00458 2019, · arXiv
  17. 2020, A generative neural network for maximizing fitness and diversity of synthetic DNA and protein sequences, Cell Systems, 11, 49, 10.1016/j.cels.2020.05.007 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Hawkins-Hooker, A. ; Depardieu, F. ; Baur, S. ; Couairon, G. ; Chen, A. ; Bikard, D . Generating functional protein variants with variational autoencoders. PLoS Computational Biology 2021, 17, e1008736. · DOI
  19. 10.1101/2023.01.23.525232 · DOI
  20. Greener, J. G. ; Moffat, L. ; Jones, D. T . Design of metalloproteins and novel protein folds using variational autoencoders. Scientific Reports 2018, 8, 16189. · DOI
  21. 2021, Efficient generative modeling of protein sequences using simple autoregressive models, Nature Communications, 12, 5800, 10.1038/s41467-021-25756-4 · DOI
  22. 10.1101/2021.04.16.440236 · DOI
  23. Bowman, S. R. ; Vilnis, L. ; Vinyals, O. ; Dai, A. M. ; Jozefowicz, R. ; Bengio, S . Generating sentences from a continuous space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06349 2015, · DOI · Paper page
  24. Zhao, S. ; Song, J. ; Ermon, S . Infovae: Balancing learning and inference in variational autoencoders. Proceedings of the AAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2019; pp 5885–5892. · DOI
  25. Chen, X. ; Kingma, D. P. ; Salimans, T. ; Duan, Y. ; Dhariwal, P. ; Schulman, J. ; Sutskever, I. ; Abbeel, P. Variational lossy autoencoder. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.02731 2016, · arXiv
  26. Van Den Oord, A. ; Vinyals, O. Neural discrete representation learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017). 2017; pp 6306–6315.
  27. Yang, Z. ; Hu, Z. ; Salakhutdinov, R. ; Berg-Kirkpatrick, T . Improved variational autoencoders for text modeling using dilated convolutions. International conference on Machine Learning. 2017; pp 3881–3890.
  28. van den Oord, A. ; Dieleman, S. ; Zen, H. ; Simonyan, K. ; Vinyals, O. ; Graves, A. ; Kalchbrenner, N. ; Senior, A. ; Kavukcuoglu, K. Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.03499 2016, · arXiv
  29. Dhariwal, P. ; Jun, H. ; Payne, C. ; Kim, J. W. ; Radford, A. ; Sutskever, I. Jukebox: A generative model for music. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00341 2020, · arXiv
  30. Rivoire, O. ; Reynolds, K. A. ; Ranganathan, R . Evolution-based functional decomposition of proteins. PLoS Computational Biology 2016, 12, e1004817. · DOI
  31. 2022, ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all, Nature Methods, 19, 679, 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Kingma, D. P. ; Mohamed, S. ; Jimenez Rezende, D. ; Welling, M . Semi-supervised learning with deep generative models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27 (NIPS 2014). 2014; pp 3581–3589.
  33. 10.1101/2021.11.09.467890 · DOI
  34. Rao, R. ; Bhattacharya, N. ; Thomas, N. ; Duan, Y. ; Chen, P. ; Canny, J. ; Abbeel, P. ; Song, Y . Evaluating protein transfer learning with TAPE. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (NeurIPS 2019). 2019; pp 9689–9701. · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1126/science.aba3304 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1038/nature02178 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.038 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq066 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 2009, Semi-supervised learning, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 20, 542
  42. 10.1073/pnas.47.9.1309 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1093/protein/2.3.193 · DOI
  44. Wu, N. C. ; Dai, L. ; Olson, C. A. ; Lloyd-Smith, J. O. ; Sun, R . Adaptation in protein fitness landscapes is facilitated by indirect paths. Elife 2016, 5, e16965. · DOI
  45. 2021, Deep diversification of an AAV capsid protein by machine learning, Nature Biotechnology, 39, 691, 10.1038/s41587-020-00793-4 · DOI
  46. 2019, Adeno-associated virus 2 bound to its cellular receptor AAVR, Nature Microbiology, 4, 675, 10.1038/s41564-018-0356-7 · DOI
  47. 10.1126/science.aan0693 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1038/nature17995 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Rives, A. ; Meier, J. ; Sercu, T. ; Goyal, S. ; Lin, Z. ; Liu, J. ; Guo, D. ; Ott, M. ; Zitnick, C. L. ; Ma, J. ; Fergus, R . Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2021, 118, e2016239118. · DOI · Paper page
  50. Meier, J. ; Rao, R. ; Verkuil, R. ; Liu, J. ; Sercu, T. ; Rives, A . Language models enable zero-shot prediction of the effects of mutations on protein function. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (NeurIPS 2021). 2021; pp 29287–29303. · DOI · Paper page
  51. Vaswani, A. ; Shazeer, N. ; Parmar, N. ; Uszkoreit, J. ; Jones, L. ; Gomez, A. N. ; Kaiser, L-. ; Polosukhin, I . Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017). 2017; pp 5998–6008.
  52. 10.1101/2022.05.19.492714 · DOI
  53. 2018, Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of molecules, ACS Central Science, 4, 268, 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00572 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Freschlin, C. R. ; Fahlberg, S. A. ; Romero, P. A . Machine learning to navigate fitness landscapes for protein engineering. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2022, 75, 102713. · DOI
  55. Kingma, D. P. ; Ba, J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 2014, · arXiv
  56. 10.1126/science.276.5319.1702 · DOI
  57. 2007, High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method, Nature Protocols, 2, 31, 10.1038/nprot.2007.13 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Praljak, N., Lian, X., Ranganathan, R., & Ferguson, A. L.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Ferguson, Andrew L.
Venue
ACS Synthetic Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-04-23
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
3544-3561
ISSN
2161-5063 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388860473
Cited by
18
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Synthetic Biology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1828629, 2140001)
  • Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation
  • University of Chicago
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (RO1GM141697, R01GM141697, R01GM144512)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (T32EB009412)
  • Division of Materials Research (1828629, DMR-1828629)
  • Division of Graduate Education (2140001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
protein design, variational autoencoder, latent space, SH3 domain, fitness prediction, protein families, deep generative models
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Genetic Techniques, Mutation, Phylogeny, Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review