The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving the prediction of protein stability changes upon mutations by geometric learning and a pre-training strategy
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s43588-024-00716-2 · Paper page
Abstract
A bstract: Accurate prediction of the fitness and stability of a protein upon mutations is of high importance in protein engineering and design. Despite the rapid development of deep learning techniques and accumulation of experimental data, the multi-labeled nature of fitness data hinders the training of robust deep-learning-based models for the fitness and stability prediction tasks. Here, we propose three geometric-learning-based models, GeoFitness, GeoDDG and GeoDTm, for the prediction of the fitness score, ΔΔ G and Δ T m of a protein upon mutations, respectively. In the optimization of GeoFitness, we designed a novel loss function to allow supervised training of a unified model using the large amount of multi-labeled fitness data in the deep mutational scanning (DMS) database. By this means, GeoFitness efficiently learns the general functional effects of protein mutations and achieves better performance over the other state-of-the-art methods. To further improve the downstream tasks of ΔΔ G /Δ T m prediction, we re-utilized the encoder of GeoFitness as a pre-trained module in GeoDDG and GeoDTm to overcome the challenge of lack of sufficient amount of specifically labeled data. This pre-training strategy in combination with data expansion remarkably improves model performance and generalizability. When evaluated on the benchmark test sets (S669 for ΔΔ G prediction and a newly collected set S571 for Δ T m prediction), GeoDDG and GeoDTm outperform the other state-of-the-art methods by at least 30% and 70%, respectively, in terms of the Spearman correlation coefficient between predicted and experimental values. An online server for the suite of these three predictors, GeoStab-suite, is available at http://structpred.life.tsinghua.edu.cn/server_geostab.html .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications
Akdel, M., Pires, D. E. V., Pardo, E. P., Jänes, J., Zalevsky, A. O., Mészáros, B., Bryant, P., Good, L. L., Laskowski, R. A., Pozzati, G., et al. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00849-w · Cited by 675
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 82
- 10.1038/s41592-018-0138-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1361-648x/aa5c76 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.278.5335.82 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.08.003 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.4947493 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12033-021-00349-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/s0065-2164(10)70001-0 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty897 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.3027 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0203819 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1901979116 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0496-6 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0598-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1107/S2052252516018017 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005786 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0583-8 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-021-01100-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.3769 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.033 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13321-023-00688-x · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-25976-8 · DOI
- 2021, Language models enable zero-shot prediction of the effects of mutations on protein function, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34, 29287
- 10.1101/2021.02.12.430858 · DOI · Paper page
- Rao, R. , Bhattacharya, N. , Thomas, N. , et al. Evaluating Protein Transfer Learning with TAPE in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Wallach, H. , Larochelle, H. , Beygelzimer, A. , et al. ) 32 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2019). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2019/file/37f65c068b7723cd7809ee2d31d7861c-Paper.pdf.
- 10.1073/pnas.1215251110 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aba3304 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.abn2100 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2022.11.04.515218 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gki375 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-14-s2-s5 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp445 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.22921 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms22020606 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-019-2923-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkx439 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt691 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gku411 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gky300 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gki387 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkr363 · DOI
- 10.1088/1361-6463/abedfb · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00697 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008291 · DOI
- 10.3390/genes12060911 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv291 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-9-s2-s6 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008543 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkad472 · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbab184 · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbab555 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2021.11.001 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0138022 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn353 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep23257 · DOI
- 10.1002/bip.20462 · DOI
- 10.1093/protein/10.1.7 · DOI
- 10.1155/2014/278385 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13059-019-1845-6 · DOI
- 10.1101/2021.11.29.470445 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkh082 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/27.1.286 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.283 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/30.1.301 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkj103 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0282(2002)61:2<121::AID-BIP10077>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa1035 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa925 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/humu.22204 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad011 · DOI
- Ingraham, J. , Garg, V. , Barzilay, R. , et al. Generative Models for Graph-Based Protein Design in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Wallach, H. , Larochelle, H. , Beygelzimer, A. , et al. ) b32 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2019). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2019/file/f3a4ff4839c56a5f460c88cce3666a2b-Paper.pdf.
- Blondel, M. , Teboul, O. , Berthet, Q. , et al. Fast Differentiable Sorting and Ranking in INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 119 (eds Daume, H. & Singh, A .) 119. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), ELECTR NETWORK, JUL 13-18, 2020 (2020).
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty348 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty340 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-023-06328-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.3942 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41594-021-00714-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Exploring evolution-aware & -free protein language models as protein function predictors
- 10.1101/2022.04.14.488301 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0282689 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhang, Y. , Li, P. , Pan, F. , et al. Applications of AlphaFold beyond Protein Structure Prediction. bioRxiv. eprint:https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/04/2021.11.03.467194.full.pdf.https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/04/2021.11.03.467194 (2021).
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, Y., Liu, D., & Gong, H.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Venue
- Nature Computational Science
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-05-30
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 840-850
- ISSN
- 2662-8457 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4403770916
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 5.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Computational Science (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (32171243)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- protein stability prediction, point mutations, geometric learning, pre-training, data expansion, labeled data scarcity
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Algorithms, Mutation, Proteins, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein, Protein Stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review