PreprintCited by 38Machine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving the prediction of protein stability changes upon mutations by geometric learning and a pre-training strategy

Open access
Xu, Yunxin, Liu, Di, Gong, Haipeng·2023·Nature Computational Science

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s43588-024-00716-2 · Paper page

Abstract

A bstract: Accurate prediction of the fitness and stability of a protein upon mutations is of high importance in protein engineering and design. Despite the rapid development of deep learning techniques and accumulation of experimental data, the multi-labeled nature of fitness data hinders the training of robust deep-learning-based models for the fitness and stability prediction tasks. Here, we propose three geometric-learning-based models, GeoFitness, GeoDDG and GeoDTm, for the prediction of the fitness score, ΔΔ G and Δ T m of a protein upon mutations, respectively. In the optimization of GeoFitness, we designed a novel loss function to allow supervised training of a unified model using the large amount of multi-labeled fitness data in the deep mutational scanning (DMS) database. By this means, GeoFitness efficiently learns the general functional effects of protein mutations and achieves better performance over the other state-of-the-art methods. To further improve the downstream tasks of ΔΔ G /Δ T m prediction, we re-utilized the encoder of GeoFitness as a pre-trained module in GeoDDG and GeoDTm to overcome the challenge of lack of sufficient amount of specifically labeled data. This pre-training strategy in combination with data expansion remarkably improves model performance and generalizability. When evaluated on the benchmark test sets (S669 for ΔΔ G prediction and a newly collected set S571 for Δ T m prediction), GeoDDG and GeoDTm outperform the other state-of-the-art methods by at least 30% and 70%, respectively, in terms of the Spearman correlation coefficient between predicted and experimental values. An online server for the suite of these three predictors, GeoStab-suite, is available at http://structpred.life.tsinghua.edu.cn/server_geostab.html .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.05.28.542668

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 82

  1. 10.1038/s41592-018-0138-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1088/1361-648x/aa5c76 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.278.5335.82 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.08.003 · DOI
  5. 10.1063/1.4947493 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s12033-021-00349-0 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/s0065-2164(10)70001-0 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty897 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nmeth.3027 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0203819 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.1901979116 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41592-019-0496-6 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41592-019-0598-1 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1107/S2052252516018017 · DOI
  15. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005786 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/s41592-019-0583-8 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/s41592-021-01100-y · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1038/nbt.3769 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.033 · DOI
  20. 10.1186/s13321-023-00688-x · DOI
  21. 10.1038/s41467-021-25976-8 · DOI
  22. 2021, Language models enable zero-shot prediction of the effects of mutations on protein function, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34, 29287
  23. 10.1101/2021.02.12.430858 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Rao, R. , Bhattacharya, N. , Thomas, N. , et al. Evaluating Protein Transfer Learning with TAPE in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Wallach, H. , Larochelle, H. , Beygelzimer, A. , et al. ) 32 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2019). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2019/file/37f65c068b7723cd7809ee2d31d7861c-Paper.pdf.
  25. 10.1073/pnas.1215251110 · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.aba3304 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1126/science.abn2100 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1101/2022.11.04.515218 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1093/nar/gki375 · DOI
  32. 10.1186/1471-2105-14-s2-s5 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp445 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/prot.22921 · DOI
  35. 10.3390/ijms22020606 · DOI
  36. 10.1186/s12859-019-2923-1 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1093/nar/gkx439 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt691 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1093/nar/gku411 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1093/nar/gky300 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1093/nar/gki387 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1093/nar/gkr363 · DOI
  43. 10.1088/1361-6463/abedfb · DOI
  44. 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00697 · DOI
  45. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008291 · DOI
  46. 10.3390/genes12060911 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv291 · DOI
  48. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-s2-s6 · DOI
  49. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008543 · DOI
  50. 10.1093/nar/gkad472 · DOI
  51. 10.1093/bib/bbab184 · DOI
  52. 10.1093/bib/bbab555 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.sbi.2021.11.001 · DOI
  54. 10.1371/journal.pone.0138022 · DOI
  55. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn353 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/srep23257 · DOI
  57. 10.1002/bip.20462 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/protein/10.1.7 · DOI
  59. 10.1155/2014/278385 · DOI
  60. 10.1186/s13059-019-1845-6 · DOI
  61. 10.1101/2021.11.29.470445 · DOI
  62. 10.1093/nar/gkh082 · DOI
  63. 10.1093/nar/27.1.286 · DOI
  64. 10.1093/nar/28.1.283 · DOI
  65. 10.1093/nar/30.1.301 · DOI
  66. 10.1093/nar/gkj103 · DOI
  67. 10.1002/1097-0282(2002)61:2<121::AID-BIP10077>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI
  68. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1035 · DOI
  69. 10.1093/nar/gkaa925 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1002/humu.22204 · DOI
  71. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad011 · DOI
  72. Ingraham, J. , Garg, V. , Barzilay, R. , et al. Generative Models for Graph-Based Protein Design in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Wallach, H. , Larochelle, H. , Beygelzimer, A. , et al. ) b32 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2019). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2019/file/f3a4ff4839c56a5f460c88cce3666a2b-Paper.pdf.
  73. Blondel, M. , Teboul, O. , Berthet, Q. , et al. Fast Differentiable Sorting and Ranking in INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 119 (eds Daume, H. & Singh, A .) 119. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), ELECTR NETWORK, JUL 13-18, 2020 (2020).
  74. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty348 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty340 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1038/s41586-023-06328-6 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1002/pro.3942 · DOI
  78. 10.1038/s41594-021-00714-2 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 2022, Exploring evolution-aware & -free protein language models as protein function predictors
  80. 10.1101/2022.04.14.488301 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1371/journal.pone.0282689 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Zhang, Y. , Li, P. , Pan, F. , et al. Applications of AlphaFold beyond Protein Structure Prediction. bioRxiv. eprint:https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/04/2021.11.03.467194.full.pdf.https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/04/2021.11.03.467194 (2021).

Metadata

Authors
Xu, Y., Liu, D., & Gong, H.
Affiliations
Tsinghua University (CN)
Venue
Nature Computational Science
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-05-30
Volume
4
Issue
11
Pages
840-850
ISSN
2662-8457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403770916
Cited by
38
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 5
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Computational Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (32171243)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
protein stability prediction, point mutations, geometric learning, pre-training, data expansion, labeled data scarcity
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Mutation, Proteins, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein, Protein Stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review