PreprintCited by 4vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesChemical Synthesis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Guiding a language-model based protein design method towards MHC Class-I immune-visibility profiles for vaccines and therapeutics

Open access
Gasser, Hans-Christof, Oyarzun, Diego, Rajan, Ajitha, Alfaro, Javier·2023·ImmunoInformatics

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.immuno.2024.100035

Abstract

Proteins have an arsenal of medical applications that include disrupting protein interactions, acting as potent vaccines, and replacing genetically deficient proteins. While therapeutics must avoid triggering unwanted immune-responses, vaccines should support a robust immune-reaction targeting a broad range of pathogen variants. Therefore, computational methods modifying proteins’ immunogenicity without disrupting function are needed. While many components of the immune-system can be involved in a reaction, we focus on Cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs). These target short peptides presented via the MHC Class I (MHC-I) pathway. To explore the limits of modifying the visibility of those peptides to CTLs within the distribution of naturally occurring sequences, we developed a novel machine learning technique, CAPE-XVAE . It combines a language model with reinforcement learning to modify a protein’s immune-visibility. Our results show that CAPE-XVAE effectively modifies the visibility of the HIV Nef protein to CTLs. We contrast CAPE-XVAE to CAPE-Packer , a physics-based method we also developed. Compared to CAPE-Packer , the machine learning approach suggests sequences that draw upon local sequence similarities in the training set. This is beneficial for vaccine development, where the sequence should be representative of the real viral population. Additionally, the language model approach holds promise for preserving both known and unknown functional constraints, which is essential for the immune-modulation of therapeutic proteins. In contrast, CAPE-Packer , emphasizes preserving the protein’s overall fold and can reach greater extremes of immune-visibility, but falls short of capturing the sequence diversity of viral variants available to learn from. Source code: https://github.com/hcgasser/CAPE (Tag: CAPE 1.1 )

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.07.10.548300

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.12.024 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/jcc.23213 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/978-1-4939-6637-0_20 · DOI
  4. A. Bootwala , H. H. An , M. W. Franklin , B. J. Manning , L. Y. Xu , S. Panchal , J. D. Garlick , R. Baral , M. E. Hudson , G. Grigoryan , M. A. Murakami , K. Hopson , D. S. Leventhal , Protein re-surfacing of E. coli L-Asparaginase to evade pre-existing anti-drug antibodies and hypersensitivity responses, Frontiers in Immunology 13 (2022). URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2022.1016179. · DOI
  5. 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00056 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/mt.2014.235 · DOI
  7. 10.1056/NEJMoa1000228 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1172/JCI36891 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/s41467-018-05843-9 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.micinf.2008.01.013 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nm0297-205 · DOI
  13. 2014, Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
  14. K. Murphy , C. Weaver , Janeway’s Immunobiology, 9th ed., Garland Science, 2017. · DOI
  15. 10.1093/nar/gkaa379 · DOI · Paper page
  16. D. Phillips , H.-C. Gasser , S. Kamp , A. Pa lkowski , L. Rabalski , D. A. Oyarzún , A. Rajan , J. A. Alfaro , Generating Immuneaware SARS-CoV-2 Spike Proteins for Universal Vaccine Design, in: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Healthcare AI and COVID-19, ICML 2022, PMLR, 2022, pp. 100–116. URL: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v184/phillips22a.html.
  17. 10.1126/science.add2187 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 2017, Attention is All you Need, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998
  19. 10.18653/v1/D19-1370 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/BF00992696 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/B978-0-12-381270-4.00019-6 · DOI
  22. 10.1371/journal.pone.0020161 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/s41592-020-0848-2 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.cels.2020.06.010 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad208 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90398-9 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.18653/v1/N19-1423 · DOI · Paper page
  30. A. Radford , K. Narasimhan , Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training, 2018. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Improving-Language-Understanding-by-Generative-Radford-Narasimhan/cd18800a0fe0b668a1cc19f2ec95b5003d0a5035.
  31. 2020, Language Models are Few-Shot Learners, in
  32. R. Sutton , A. Barto , Reinforcement Learning - An Introduction, 2 ed., MIT Press, 2018.
  33. 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2929141 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 2017, Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
  35. 2019, Optuna, A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework

Metadata

Authors
Gasser, H.-C., Oyarzun, D., Rajan, A., & Alfaro, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Gasser, Hans-Christof
  • Rajan, Ajitha
  • Alfaro, Javier
Venue
ImmunoInformatics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-07-11
Volume
14
Pages
100035-100035
ISSN
2667-1190 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396689858
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • ImmunoInformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • UK Research and Innovation (EP/S02431X/1, grant EP/S02431X/1)
  • Royal Academy of Engineering
  • European Commission (H2020)
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej
  • Infrastruktura PL-Grid
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
  • European Regional Development Fund (H2020)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
protein design, MHC class I, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, CTL epitopes, HIV Nef protein, language models, reinforcement learning, variational autoencoder, vaccine design, therapeutic proteins, epitope modification, sequence diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review