PreprintCited by 4Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Catalysis and ImmobilizationEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Guiding Discovery of Protein Sequence-Structure-Function Modeling

Open access
Hussain, Azam, Brooks, Charles L.·2023·Bioinformatics

Preprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae002

Abstract

Protein engineering techniques are key in designing novel catalysts for a wide range of reactions. Although approaches vary in their exploration of the sequence-structure-function paradigm, they are often hampered by the labor-intensive steps of protein expression and screening. In this work, we describe the development and testing of a high throughput in silico sequence-structure-function pipeline using AlphaFold2 and Fast Fourier Transform docking that is benchmarked with enantioselectivity and reactivity predictions for an ancestral sequence library of fungal flavin-dependent monooxygenases. The predicted enantioselectivities and reactivities correlate well with previously described screens of an experimentally available subset of these proteins and capture known changes in enantioselectivity across the phylogenetic tree representing ancestorial proteins from this family. With this pipeline established as our functional screen, we apply ensemble decision tree models and explainable AI techniques to build sequence function models and extract critical residues within the binding site and the second sphere residues around this site. We demonstrate that the top-identified key residues in the control of enantioselectivity and reactivity correspond to experimentally verified residues. The in silico sequence-to-function pipeline serves as an accelerated framework to inform protein engineering efforts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.07.14.548822

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. 10.1038/nrm975 · DOI
  2. 10.1101/2022.12.06.519132 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/nrg3927 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.08.011 · DOI
  5. 2023, Rational design of enzyme activity and enantioselectivity, Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 11, 91
  6. 2021, Applying and improving AlphaFold at CASP14, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 89, 1711, 10.1002/prot.26257 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 2023, Structural biology at the scale of proteomes, Nat Struct Mol Biol, 30, 129, 10.1038/s41594-023-00924-w · DOI
  10. 2019, End-to-End Differentiable Learning of Protein Structure, Cell Syst, 8, 292, 10.1016/j.cels.2019.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 2022, ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all, Nature Methods 2022 19:6, 19, 679
  12. 10.1073/pnas.2113348119 · DOI
  13. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty1057 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/nrm2281 · DOI
  16. 10.1897/01-171 · DOI
  17. 10.2174/157340911795677602 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 2020, Accelerated CDOCKER with GPUs, Parallel Simulated Annealing, and Fast Fourier Transforms, J Chem Theory Comput, 16, 3910, 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00145 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/jcc.21287 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/nmeth.4067 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/jcc.21367 · DOI
  22. 2017, H. Biocatalytic site- and enantioselective oxidative dearomatization of phenols, Nature Chemistry 2017 10:2, 10, 119
  23. 2019, Stereodivergent, chemoenzymatic synthesis of azaphilone natural products, J Am Chem Soc, 141, 18551, 10.1021/jacs.9b09385 · DOI
  24. 2019, Hydroxyl Radical-Coupled Electron-Transfer Mechanism of Flavin-Dependent Hydroxylases, Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 123, 8065, 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b08178 · DOI
  25. 2019, Positioning-Group-Enabled Biocatalytic Oxidative Dearomatization, ACS Cent. Sci, 5, 1010, 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00163 · DOI
  26. 10.1021/acscatal.8b04575 · DOI
  27. 2019, Ancestral-sequence reconstruction unveils the structural basis of function in mammalian FMOs, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 2019 27:1, 27, 14
  28. 2023, Deciphering the evolution of flavin-dependent monooxygenase stereoselectivity using ancestral sequence reconstruction, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120, e2218248120, 10.1073/pnas.2218248120 · DOI
  29. 2019, High-Throughput Reconstruction of Ancestral Protein Sequence, Structure, and Molecular Function, Methods in Molecular Biology, 1851, 135, 10.1007/978-1-4939-8736-8_8 · DOI
  30. Eswar, N. et al.. Comparative protein structure modeling using Modeller. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics Chapter 5, (2006). · DOI
  31. 10.15252/MSB.202211081 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00203 · DOI
  33. 2015, Enantioselective enzymes by computational design and in silico screening, Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 54, 3726, 10.1002/anie.201411415 · DOI
  34. 2014, Computationally Efficient and Accurate Enantioselectivity Modeling by Clusters of Molecular Dynamics Simulations, J. Chem. Inf. Model, 54, 2079, 10.1021/ci500126x · DOI
  35. 2020, Computational Design of Enantiocomplementary Epoxide Hydrolases for Asymmetric Synthesis of Aliphatic and Aromatic Diols, ChemBioChem, 21, 1893, 10.1002/cbic.201900726 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/s41592-022-01685-y · DOI · Paper page
  37. 2002, Increasing the precision of comparative models with YASARA NOVA—a self-parameterizing force field, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 47, 393, 10.1002/prot.10104 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/s41592-019-0496-6 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1073/pnas.1901979116 · DOI
  40. 2018, A machine learning approach for reliable prediction of amino acid interactions and its application in the directed evolution of enantioselective enzymes, Scientific Reports 2018 8:1, 8, 1
  41. 2017, A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765
  42. Linardatos, P. , Papastefanopoulos, V. & Kotsiantis, S. Explainable AI: A Review of Machine Learning Interpretability Methods. Entropy 2021, Vol. 23, Page 18 23, 18 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  43. 2020, An Interpretable Prediction Model for Identifying N7-Methylguanosine Sites Based on XGBoost and SHAP, Mol Ther Nucleic Acids, 22, 362, 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.08.022 · DOI
  44. 2020, Interpretation of machine learning models using shapley values: application to compound potency and multi-target activity predictions, J Comput Aided Mol Des, 34, 1013, 10.1007/s10822-020-00314-0 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1002/jcc.20290 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1039/c6cp01555g · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.5.412 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2004.09.006 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty374 · DOI
  52. 10.1021/jm048957q · DOI · Paper page
  53. Plonska, A. & Plonski, P. MLJAR: State-of-the-art Automated Machine Learning Framework for Tabular Data.. Preprint at https://github.com/mljar/mljar-supervised (2021).
  54. 10.48550/arXiv.1810.11363 · DOI
  55. 10.48550/arXiv.1603.02754 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1524/auto.2011.0951 · DOI
  57. 10.1186/s12859-019-2669-9 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 2023, pyCHARMM: Embedding CHARMM Functionality in a Python Framework, J Chem Theory Comput, 19, 3752, 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00364 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.jmgm.2003.12.005 · DOI
  61. 10.1017/CBO9780511686948 · DOI
  62. Seabold, S. & Perktold, J. Statsmodels: Econometric and statistical modeling with Python. in 9th Python in Science Conference (2010). · DOI
  63. 10.1038/msb.2011.75 · DOI
  64. Breiman, L. Classification and regression trees. (Routledge, 2017). · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 2017, LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 3149
  67. 2016, Tensorflow: a system for large-scale machine learning. in Osdi, 16, 265
  68. 2020, From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees, Nature Machine Intelligence 2020 2:1, 2, 56

Metadata

Authors
Hussain, A., & Brooks, C. L.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Brooks, Charles L.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-07-16
Volume
40
Issue
1
ISSN
1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390706227
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM130587)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein engineering, enantioselectivity prediction, reactivity prediction, flavin-dependent monooxygenase, AlphaFold2, decision tree ensembles, explainable AI, binding site residues, fungal enzymes, directed evolution
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Phylogeny, Proteins, Software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review