The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3D modeling of CpG DNA binding with matrix lumican shows leucine-rich repeat motif involvement as in TLR9- CpG DNA interactions
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.3390/ijms241914990
Abstract
Lumican is an extracellular matrix proteoglycan, known to regulate toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling in innate immune cells. In experimental settings, lumican suppresses TLR9 signaling by binding to, and sequestering its synthetic ligand, CpG-DNA, in non-signal permissive endosomes. However, the molecular details of lumican interactions with CpG-DNA are obscure. Here, the 3-D structure of the 22 base-long CpG-DNA (CpG ODN_2395) bound to lumican or TLR9 were modeled using homology modeling and docking methods. Some of the TLR9-CpG ODN_2395 features predicted by our model are consistent with the previously reported TLR9-CpG DNA crystal structure, substantiating our current analysis. Our modeling indicated a smaller buried surface area for lumican-CpG ODN_2395 (1803 A 2 ) compared to that of TLR9-CpG ODN_2395 (2094 A 2 ), implying a potentially lower binding strength for lumican and CpG-DNA than TLR9 and CpG-DNA. The docking analysis identified 32 amino acids in lumican LRR1-11 interacting with CpG ODN_2395, primarily through hydrogen bonding, salt-bridges and hydrophobic interactions. Our study provides molecular insights into lumican and CpG-DNA interactions that may lead to molecular targets for modulating TLR9 mediated inflammation and autoimmunity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- Hassell, J. R. , Blochberger, T. C. , Rada, J. A. , Chakravarti, S. , and Noonan, D. (1993) Proteoglycan gene families, · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.R800020200 · DOI
- 10.1006/geno.1995.1080 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.exer.2016.08.015 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2100999118 · DOI
- 1991, Proteoglycan: collagen interactions in connective tissues, Ultrastructural, biochemical, functional and evolutionary aspects International journal of biological macromolecules, 13, 157
- 10.1006/exer.1993.1081 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01314-4 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M805721200 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0007028 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.136.3.729 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.141.5.1277 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/1746 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.274.14.9636 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.matbio.2010.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.matbio.2014.01.004 · DOI
- 10.1038/ni.1863 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.041 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1196/annals.1348.005 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.24616 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.013 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.82.7.1906 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2180-10-235 · DOI
- 10.1186/1472-6807-8-47 · DOI
- 10.4161/auto.7.9.16464 · DOI
- 10.1186/1742-4682-10-18 · DOI
- 10.1002/1873-3468.13176 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1471-4906(03)00242-4 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.151.4.779 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi982362d · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.20100682 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature07405 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.05.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.04.001 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.00291 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gky949 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/msb.2011.75 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-0716-0708-4_12 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkv315 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, T., Maiti, G., & Chakravarti, S.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Maiti, George
- Chakravarti, Shukti
- Venue
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-08-22
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 14990-14990
- ISSN
- 1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10573802
- OpenAlex
- W4387457633
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Research to Prevent Blindness
- National Institutes of Health
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine
- National Eye Institute (R01EY030917, R01EY026104)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
- Keywords
- lumican, CpG DNA, TLR9, extracellular matrix proteoglycans, innate immunity, ligand binding, homology modeling, molecular docking, buried surface area, autoimmunity, inflammation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review