PreprintCited by 7Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsTopological and Geometric Data Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Topological Properties of the Protein Universe

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-025-61108-2 · Paper page

Abstract

Deep learning methods have revolutionized our ability to predict protein structures, allowing us a glimpse into the entire protein universe. As a result, our understanding of how protein structure drives function is now lagging behind our ability to determine and predict protein structure. Here, we describe how topology, the branch of mathematics concerned with qualitative properties of spatial structures, provides a lens through which we can identify fundamental organizing features across the known protein universe. We identify topological determinants that capture global features of the protein universe, such as domain architecture and binding sites. Additionally, our analysis also identified highly specific properties, so-called topological generators, that can be used to provide deeper insights into protein structure-function and evolutionary relationships. We used our approach to determine structural, functional and disease consequences of mutations, explain differences in properties of proteins in mesophiles and thermophiles, and the likely structural and functional consequences of polymorphisms in a protein. Overall, we present a practical methodology for mapping the topology of the known protein universe at scale.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.09.25.559443

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  5. J. Durairaj , et al., Nature pp. 1–3 (2023). · DOI
  6. 10.1038/268495a0 · DOI
  7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0089680 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.04.001 · DOI
  9. A. Hatcher , Algebraic topology (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000).
  10. H. Edelsbrunner , J. Harer , Computational topology: an introduction (American Mathematical Soc., 2010). · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90124-4 · DOI
  12. M. Atiyah , The Floer memorial volume pp. 105–108 (1995). · DOI
  13. S. K. Donaldson , Floer homology groups in Yang-Mills theory, vol. 147 (Cambridge University Press, 2002). · DOI
  14. 2002, Zomorodian, Discrete & Computational Geometry, 28, 511, 10.1007/s00454-002-2885-2 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 2012, Advances in applied and computational topology, 70, 1, 10.1090/psapm/070/587 · DOI
  16. 2005, Discrete & Computational Geometry, 33, 249, 10.1007/s00454-004-1146-y · DOI · Paper page
  17. 2008, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 45, 61
  18. 2018, Nature communications, 9, 1399, 10.1038/s41467-018-03664-4 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1126/sciadv.abc2320 · DOI
  20. 10.1073/pnas.2102166118 · DOI
  21. 2022, Bioinformatics, 38, 2529, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac118 · DOI
  22. 2023, Communications biology, 6, 160, 10.1038/s42003-023-04488-9 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 2020, Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2614, 10.21105/joss.02614 · DOI
  24. 2022, arXiv preprint
  25. 2016, Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 15, 19
  26. 2023, Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 20, 20220727, 10.1098/rsif.2022.0727 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/76115 · DOI
  28. 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States, 105, 6959, 10.1073/pnas.0708078105 · DOI
  29. 2021, Nucleic acids research, 49, D266, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1079 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1093/NAR/GKAC1052 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1038/nsb1196-923 · DOI
  32. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.50.1.485 · DOI
  33. 10.1126/science.8235610 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/nar/gkx1012 · DOI
  35. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1002/pro.4353 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c04346 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 2007, Discrete & computational geometry, 37, 103, 10.1007/s00454-006-1276-5 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00133-7 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.04.009 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s00439-020-02246-z · DOI
  42. 2021, Ripser: efficient computation of vietoris–rips persistence barcodes, Journal of Applied and Computational Topology, 5, 391, 10.1007/s41468-021-00071-5 · DOI
  43. 2021, Fast computation of persistent homology representatives with involuted persistent homology, arXiv preprint
  44. 2015, Multiscale topology of chromatin folding, arXiv preprint
  45. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 2021, Node and edge nonlinear eigenvector centrality for hypergraphs, Communications Physics, 4, 1
  47. 2015, Thermophiles in the genomic era: Biodiversity, science, and applications, Biotechnology Advances, 33, 633, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.04.007 · DOI
  48. Weixin Wang , Hui Wang , Guozhong Dai , and Hongan Wang . Visualization of large hierarchical data by circle packing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ‘06, pages 517–520, New York, NY, USA, 2006. Association for Computing Machinery. · DOI
  49. Hadley Wickham . ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York, 2016. · DOI
  50. Simon Zhang , Mengbai Xiao , and Hao Wang . Gpu-accelerated computation of vietorisrips persistence barcodes. In 36th International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2020). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2020.

Metadata

Authors
Madsen, C. D., Barbensi, A., Zhang, S. Y., Ham, L., David, A., Pires, D. E. V., & Stumpf, M. P. H.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Pires, Douglas E.V.
  • Stumpf, Michael P.H.
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-09-26
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
7503-7503
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413117324
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (218242, 218242/Z/19/Z)
  • University of Melbourne
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
Keywords
protein topology, domain architecture, protein binding sites, protein structure-function relationship, protein evolution, polymorphism, pathogenic variants, protein structure prediction
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Deep Learning, Binding Sites, Humans, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review