PreprintCited by 12DNA Repair MechanismsBRCA gene mutations in cancerEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DMC1 and RAD51 bind FxxA and FxPP motifs of BRCA2 via two separate interfaces

Open access
Miron, Simona, Legrand, Pierre, van Rossum-Fikkert, Sari E., Ristic, Dejan, Badar, Atifa, Kanaar, Roland, Zinn-Justin, Sophie, Zelensky, Alex N.·2023·Nucleic Acids Research

Preprint — published as 10.1093/nar/gkae452

Abstract

In vertebrates, the BRCA2 protein is essential for meiotic and somatic homologous recombination (HR) due to its interaction with RAD51 and DMC1 strand exchange proteins (recombinases). The interaction is mediated by FxxA and FxPP motifs, whose defining feature is the invariant phenylalanine. The FxxA motifs, present in the eight BRC repeats in the central region of BRCA2, compete with the FxxA motif of the linker region of RAD51 that is responsible for recombinase self-oligomerization. In vitro, BRCs disrupt RAD51 nucleoprotein filaments, but they are essential for RAD51 function in the context of the full-length BRCA2 protein. The role of the FxPP motifs is poorly studied but they also contribute to BRCA2 function in cells. In particular, the C-terminal TR2/CTRB domain of BRCA2, which contains an FxPP motif, is required for stabilization of RAD51 filament and replication fork protection. We recently found that deletion of the BRCA2 PhePP domain, which contains another FxPP motif, disrupts DMC1 but not RAD51 function in meiosis. Here we provide a mechanistic explanation for this phenotype by solving the crystal structure of the complex between DMC1 and the PhePP domain of BRCA2. Our structure reveals that, despite sequence similarity, the A-motifs (FxxA) and P-motifs (FxPP) bind to distinct and contiguous sites on the recombinases. The PhePP P-motif binding site is mostly located at the ATPase domain surface of a DMC1 monomer, but also extends to the linker region of the adjacent monomer, thus engaging two adjacent protomers in the DMC1 oligomer. Our structural analysis provides a mechanism explaining how PhePP favors the formation of the DMC1 nucleoprotein filament and stabilizes it. It corroborates and explains the stabilizing effect of the P-motif from BRCA2 TR2/CTRB on RAD51.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.10.05.561053

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. 10.3390/genes12081229 · DOI
  2. 10.1101/sqb.2017.82.035006 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.07.001 · DOI
  4. 10.1242/dev.00888 · DOI
  5. 1998, Thymic lymphomas in mice with a truncating mutation in Brca2, Cancer Res, 58, 1338
  6. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600146 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/ng1297-423 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.1011630107 · DOI
  9. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001357 · DOI
  10. 1997, RAD51 interacts with the evolutionarily conserved BRC motifs in the human breast cancer susceptibility gene brca2, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272, 31944
  11. 10.1073/pnas.95.9.5287 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90446-J · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90038-8 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601739 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03947.x · DOI
  16. 10.1073/pnas.1601691113 · DOI
  17. 10.1146/annurev-genet-022120-112523 · DOI
  18. 10.1101/cshperspect.a016451 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/plcell/koab136 · DOI
  20. 10.1101/2023.04.27.538421 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/hmg/dds222 · DOI
  22. Koornneef, L. , van Rossum-Fikkert, S.E. , Miron, S. , Sleddens-Linkels, E. , Maas, A. , van Loon, Y. , Barchi, M. , Zinn-Justin, S. , Essers, J. , Kanaar, R. , et al. (2023). Chromosome Pairing Through Tensioned DNA Tethers Revealed By BRCA2 Meiotic Domain Deletion. bioRxiv. · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00632-9 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00367-8 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/nature03284 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.04.006 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07440.x · DOI
  28. 10.1038/nature03404 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/nar/gkr295 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41467-023-36211-x · DOI
  31. 10.1038/nsmb1251 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.08.014 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/nsmb1245 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.057 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.05.015 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1038/nature01230 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00394-0 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/emboj/cdg429 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/nsmb.3336 · DOI
  40. 10.1042/bcj20220141 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/nar/gkp873 · DOI
  42. 10.1073/pnas.2017708118 · DOI
  43. 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10684 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00218-7 · DOI
  45. 10.1093/nar/gkn362 · DOI
  46. 10.1107/s1744309113005678 · DOI
  47. 10.1074/jbc.M112.375014 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100355 · DOI
  49. 10.1073/pnas.1220662110 · DOI
  50. 10.1074/jbc.m111.290015 · DOI
  51. 10.1073/pnas.1016454108 · DOI
  52. 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1093/nar/gkab1141 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/s41467-020-20258-1 · DOI
  55. 10.1107/s2059798316000954 · DOI
  56. 10.1107/s0907444909047337 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1107/S0021889897006766 · DOI
  58. 10.1107/S0907444911056058 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1107/s0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1002/pro.3943 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/S1568-7864(02)00110-6 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Miron, S., Legrand, P., van Rossum-Fikkert, S. E., Ristic, D., Badar, A., Kanaar, R., Zinn-Justin, S., & Zelensky, A. N.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Synchrotron SOLEIL (FR)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Kanaar, Roland
  • Zelensky, Alex N.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-10-05
Volume
52
Issue
12
Pages
7337-7353
ISSN
0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399283768
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-INSB-05-01., 10-INSB-05-01, ANR- 10-INSB-05, ANR-10)
  • European Synchrotron Radiation Facility
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Erasmus Medisch Centrum
  • KWF Kankerbestrijding
  • French Infrastructure for Integrated Structural Biology (ANR-10- INSB-05, ANR-10-INSB-0501, INSB-05)
  • Oncode Institute
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (871037)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
BRCA2, DMC1, RAD51, BRC repeats, homologous recombination, protein-protein interfaces, ATPase domain, meiotic recombination, RAD51AP1, FIGNL1, crystal structure
MeSH terms
Animals, Binding Sites, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Crystallography, X-Ray, Cell Cycle Proteins, Amino Acid Motifs, BRCA2 Protein, Phosphate-Binding Proteins, Rad51 Recombinase, Mice, Homologous Recombination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review