Heritability within groups is uninformative about differences among groups: cases from behavioral, evolutionary, and statistical genetics
Open accessAbstract
Without the ability to control or randomize environments (or genotypes), it is difficult to determine the degree to which observed phenotypic differences between two groups of individuals are due to genetic vs. environmental differences. However, some have suggested that these concerns may be limited to pathological cases, and methods have appeared that seem to give—directly or indirectly—some support to claims that aggregate heritable variation within groups can be related to heritable variation among groups. We consider three families of approaches: the “between-group heritability” sometimes invoked in behavior genetics, the statistic P ST used in empirical work in evolutionary quantitative genetics, and methods based on variation in ancestry in an admixed population, used in anthropological and statistical genetics. We take up these examples to show mathematically that information on within-group genetic and phenotypic information in the aggregate cannot separate among-group differences into genetic and environmental components, and we provide simulation results that support our claims. We discuss these results in terms of the long-running debate on this topic.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement
Jensen, A. (1969) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.39.1.l3u15956627424k7 · Cited by 2,907 · see citing works
QST–FST comparisons: evolutionary and ecological insights from genomic heterogeneity
Leinonen, T., McCairns, R. J. S., O'Hara, R. B., & Merilä, J. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3395 · Cited by 422 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Thus, by testing whether Q ST is significantly greater than F ST , it is possible to determine whether there is more genetically explained trait variation among populations than expected under neutral evolution (Leinonen et al., 2013; Prout & Barker, 1993; Spitze, 1993; Whitlock, 2008).”
The evolution of group differences in changing environments
Harpak, A., & Przeworski, M. (2021) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001072 · Cited by 50 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, we highlight the difficulty of interpreting Q ST and P ST in the presence of environmental differences between groups, adding to recent arguments by Harpak and Przeworski (2021).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schraiber, J. G., & Edge, M. D. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2319496121 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Schraiber, J. G., & Edge, M. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Edge, Michael D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-11-06
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e2319496121-e2319496121
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10962975
- OpenAlex
- W4392696419
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 3.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM137758)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- heritability, behavioral genetics, admixture, statistical genetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review