Cited by 50Evolution and Genetic DynamicsEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

The evolution of group differences in changing environments

Open access
Harpak, Arbel, Przeworski, Molly·2021·PLOS Biology

Abstract

The selection pressures that have shaped the evolution of complex traits in humans remain largely unknown, and in some contexts highly contentious, perhaps above all where they concern mean trait differences among groups. To date, the discussion has focused on whether such group differences have any genetic basis, and if so, whether they are without fitness consequences and arose via random genetic drift, or whether they were driven by selection for different trait optima in different environments. Here, we highlight a plausible alternative: that many complex traits evolve under stabilizing selection in the face of shifting environmental effects. Under this scenario, there will be rapid evolution at the loci that contribute to trait variation, even when the trait optimum remains the same. These considerations underscore the strong assumptions about environmental effects that are required in ascribing trait differences among groups to genetic differences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001072

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 116 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [48]Barton NH. Pleiotropic models of quantitative variation. Genetics. 1990; 124: 773– 82. 2311921 PMC1203967
  2. [49]Pickrell JK, Berisa T, Liu JZ, Ségurel L, Tung JY, Hinds DA. Detection and interpretation of shared genetic influences on 42 human traits. Nat Genet. 2016; 48: 709 10.1038/ng.3570 27182965 PMC5207801 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [66]Kondrashov AS, Turelli M. Deleterious mutations, apparent stabilizing selection and the maintenance of quantitative variation. Genetics. 1992; 132: 603– 18. 1427047 PMC1205161
  4. [67]Hill WG, Keightley PD. Interrelations of mutation, population size, artificial and natural selection. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quantitative Genetics. 1988; 57– 70.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harpak, A., & Przeworski, M.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Harpak, Arbel
  • Przeworski, Molly
Venue
PLOS Biology
Published
2021-01-25
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
e3001072
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W3092640579
Cited by
50
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Simons Foundation (633313)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG011432)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM121372)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
group differences, complex traits, stabilizing selection, environmental change, genetic drift, human evolution, selection pressure, rapid evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Environment, Biological Evolution, Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Selection, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Multifactorial Inheritance, Quantitative Trait Loci, Genetic Drift, Genetic Speciation, Genetic Association Studies, Climate Change, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review