PreprintCited by 334Pharmacology and Obesity TreatmentDiabetes Treatment and ManagementBariatric Surgery and Outcomes

Comparative Effectiveness of Semaglutide and Tirzepatide for Weight Loss in Adults with Overweight and Obesity in the US: A Real-World Evidence Study

Open access
Rodriguez, Patricia J, Goodwin Cartwright, Brianna M, Gratzl, Samuel, Brar, Rajdeep, Baker, Charlotte, Gluckman, Ty J., Stucky, Nicholas L·2023·JAMA Internal Medicine

Preprint — published as 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.2525 · Paper page

Abstract

Background: Both tirzepatide and semaglutide have been shown to reduce weight for patients with overweight or obesity in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While tirzepatide appears to provide greater weight loss than semaglutide in this population, head-to-head RCTs are not yet available. Accordingly, we sought to compare on-treatment weight loss in a real-world setting for adults with overweight or obesity initiated on tirzepatide or semaglutide. Methods: Adults with overweight or obesity first dispensed semaglutide or tirzepatide between May 2022 and September 2023 were identified from Truveta Data, a large electronic health record (EHR) dataset linked with comprehensive pharmacy dispensing data. The study cohort was restricted to patients with no prior GLP-1 RA use, who initiated a formulation of semaglutide or tirzepatide labelled for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) (a proxy for dose), received regular care in the previous year, had a GLP-1 RA prescription written in the 60 days prior to initiation, and had an available baseline weight. On treatment weight changes in a propensity score matched population were compared for outcomes of time to 5%, 10%, and 15% weight loss, and percentage change in weight by 3, 6, and 12 months. For all outcomes, we conducted subgroup analyses stratified by T2D (on-label users) and sensitivity analyses using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results: A total of 41,223 patients met our cohort definition (semaglutide: 32,030; tirzepatide: 9,193). Propensity score matching produced an analytic cohort of 18,386 patients with good balance on all baseline covariates. At treatment initiation, the mean(SD) age was 52.0 (12.9) years, 70.5% of patients were female, 51.7% had T2D, and mean(SD) weight was 110 (25.7) kg. A larger proportion of patients on tirzepatide, compared to semaglutide, achieved weight reductions ≥5% (81.8% vs. 64.6%), ≥10% (62.1% vs. 38.0%), and ≥15% (42.3% vs 19.3%) within 1 year on treatment, yielding hazard ratios of 1.76 (1.68 - 1.85) for 5%, 2.42 (2.25 - 2.59) for 10%, and 3.04 (2.73 - 3.38) for 15% weight loss. Patients on tirzepatide experienced larger changes in percentage of body weight lost at 3 months on treatment (difference [95% CI]) (−2.3% [-2.5%, -2.2%]), 6 months on treatment (−4.3% [-4.6%, -3.9%]), and 12 months on treatment (−7.2% [-8.3%, -6.2%]). Hazards for all gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events were similar between groups. Conclusion: In a real-world population of US adults with overweight or obesity initiated on tirzepatide or semaglutide formulations labelled for T2D, patients on tirzepatide were significantly more likely to achieve 5%, 10% and 15% weight loss and experience larger reductions in weight at 3, 6, and 12 months. Findings were robust to analytic choice and consistent among populations stratified by T2D. Future work is needed to understand whether these findings result in a differential impact on other outcomes, including rates of adverse cardiovascular events.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.11.21.23298775

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Ogden CL, Fakhouri TH, Carroll MD, et al. Prevalence of obesity among adults, by household income and education -United States, 2011-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(50): 1369-1373. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6650a1 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Raisi-Estabragh Z, Kobo O, Mieres JH, et al. Racial disparities in obesity-related cardiovascular mortality in the United States: temporal trends from 1999 to 2020. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12(18): e028409. doi:10.1161/JAHA.122.028409 · DOI
  3. Wing RR, Lang W, Wadden TA, et al; Look AHEAD Research Group. Benefits of modest weight loss in improving cardiovascular risk factors in overweight and obese individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(7):1481-1486. doi:10.2337/dc10-2415 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Fujioka K. Safety and tolerability of medications approved for chronic weight management. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015;23(S1)(suppl 1):S7-S11. doi:10. 1002/oby.21094 · DOI
  5. SamaranayakeNR,OngKL,LeungRYH,CheungBMY. Management of obesity in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2007-2008. Ann Epidemiol. 2012;22(5):349-353. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, et al; STEP 1 Study Group. Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(11):989-1002. doi:10.1056/ NEJMoa2032183 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Davies M, Færch L, Jeppesen OK, et al; STEP 2 Study Group. Semaglutide 2•4 mg once a week in adults with overweight or obesity, and type 2 diabetes (STEP 2): a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10278):971-984. doi:10.1016/ S0140-6736(21)00213-0 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Garvey WT, Batterham RL, Bhatta M, et al; STEP 5 Study Group. Two-year effects of semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity: the STEP 5 trial. Nat Med. 2022;28(10):2083-2091. doi:10.1038/ s41591-022-02026-4 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Jastreboff AM, Aronne LJ, Ahmad NN, et al; SURMOUNT-1 Investigators. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(3):205-216. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2206038 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Garvey WT, Frias JP, Jastreboff AM, et al; SURMOUNT-2 investigators. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity in people with type 2 diabetes (SURMOUNT-2): a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023;402(10402):613-626. Published online 2023. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23) 01200-X · DOI · Paper page
  11. Frías JP, Davies MJ, Rosenstock J, et al; SURPASS-2 Investigators. Tirzepatide versus semaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(6):503-515. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2107519 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Johnson-Mann CN, Cupka JS, Ro A, et al. A systematic review on participant diversity in clinical trials-have we made progress for the management of obesity and its metabolic sequelae in diet, drug, and surgical trials. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023;10 (6):3140-3149. doi:10.1007/s40615-022-01487-0 · DOI
  13. Clark LT, Watkins L, Piña IL, et al. Increasing diversity in clinical trials: overcoming critical barriers. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2019;44(5):148-172. doi:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2018.11.002 · DOI
  14. Averitt AJ, Weng C, Ryan P, Perotte A. Translating evidence into practice: eligibility criteria fail to eliminate clinically significant differences between real-world and study populations. NPJ Digit Med. 2020;3(1):67. doi:10. 1038/s41746-020-0277-8 · DOI · Paper page
  15. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453-1457. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736 (07)61602-X · DOI · Paper page
  16. Whitley HP, Trujillo JM, Neumiller JJ. Special report: potential strategies for addressing GLP-1 and dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist shortages. Clin Diabetes. 2023;41(3):467-473. doi:10.2337/ cd23-0023 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Austin PC. The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments. Stat Med. 2014;33(7): 1242-1258. doi:10.1002/sim.5984 · DOI
  18. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Wiley; 1987. doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA. MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw. 2011;42(8):1-28. doi:10. 18637/jss.v042.i08 · DOI · Paper page
  20. R-project.org/package=WeightIt 30. van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw. 2011;45(3):1-67. doi:10.18637/jss. v045.i03 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Pishgar F, Greifer N, Leyrat C, Stuart E. MatchThem: matching and weighting after multiple imputation. R J. Published online 2021. doi:10.32614/RJ-2021-073 · DOI
  22. Weiss T, Yang L, Carr RD, et al. Real-world weight change, adherence, and discontinuation among patients with type 2 diabetes initiating glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in the UK. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2022;10(1):e002517. doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002517 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Durden E, Liang M, Fowler R, Panton UH, Mocevic E. The Effect of early response to GLP-1 RA therapy on long-term adherence and persistence among type 2 diabetes patients in the United States. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019;25(6): 669-680. doi:10.18553/jmcp.2019.18429 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Wharton S, Astrup A, Endahl L, et al. Estimating and reporting treatment effects in clinical trials for weight management: using estimands to interpret effects of intercurrent events and missing data. Int J Obes (Lond). 2021;45(5):923-933. doi:10.1038/s41366-020-00733-x · DOI · Paper page
  25. Usman MS, Davies M, Hall ME, et al. The cardiovascular effects of novel weight loss therapies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(48):5036-5048. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad664 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodriguez, P. J., Goodwin Cartwright, B. M., Gratzl, S., Brar, R., Baker, C., Gluckman, T. J., & Stucky, N. L.
Corresponding author
Stucky, Nicholas L
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-11-22
Volume
184
Issue
9
Pages
1056-1056
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400415068
Cited by
334
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 135 · 2025: 172 · 2024: 27
FWCI
94.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Keywords
semaglutide, tirzepatide, weight loss, obesity, overweight, type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 receptor agonists, gastrointestinal adverse effects, off-label drug use, real-world evidence, propensity score matching, weight regain, prescription dispensing data, electronic health records, health care system
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Tirzepatide, Semaglutide, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Weight Loss, Anti-Obesity Agents, Overweight, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review