PreprintCited by 2Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unsupervised learning reveals landscape of local structural motifs across protein classes

Open access
Derry, Alexander, Altman, Russ B.·2023·Bioinformatics

Preprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf377

Abstract

Proteins are known to share similarities in local regions of 3D structure even across disparate global folds. Such correspondences can help to shed light on functional relationships between proteins and identify conserved local structural features that lead to function. Self-supervised deep learning on large protein structure datasets has produced high-fidelity representations of local structural microenvironments, enabling comparison of local structure and function at scale. In this work, we leverage these representations to cluster over 15 million environments in the Protein Data Bank, resulting in the creation of a “lexicon” of local 3D motifs which form the building blocks of all known protein structures. We characterize these motifs and demonstrate that they provide valuable information for modeling structure and function at all scales of protein analysis, from full protein chains to binding pockets to individual amino acids. We devise a new protein representation based solely on its constituent local motifs and show that this representation enables state-of-the-art performance on protein structure search and model quality assessment. We then show that this approach enables accurate prediction of drug off-target interactions by modeling the similarity between local binding pockets. Finally, we identify structural motifs associated with pathogenic variants in the human proteome by leveraging the predicted structures in the AlphaFold structure database.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.12.04.569990

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 10.1093/nar/gkz1064 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/nar/gkab1054 · DOI
  3. 2021, CATH: increased structural coverage of functional space, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, D266, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1079 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00992-0 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.str.2005.05.009 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.04.007 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.0907971106 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/nar/gkt1130 · DOI
  9. 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0424 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00942-7 · DOI
  11. Rohl, C. A. , Strauss, C. E. M. , Misura, K. M. S. & Baker, D. Protein structure prediction using rosetta. In Methods in Enzymology, vol. 383, 66–93 (Academic Press, 2004). · DOI
  12. 10.1186/gb-2008-9-3-r52 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/prot.340050410 · DOI
  14. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1993 · DOI
  15. 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4391 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.05.067 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Zemla, A. , Allen, J. E. , Kirshner, D. & Lightstone, F. C. PDBspheres - a method for finding 3D similarities in local regions in proteins (2022). · DOI
  18. 1995, Characterizing the microenvironment surrounding protein sites, Protein Sci, 4, 622, 10.1002/pro.5560040404 · DOI
  19. 2008, The FEATURE framework for protein function annotation: modeling new functions, improving performance, and extending to novel applications, BMC Genomics, 9, S2
  20. 2010, Identification of recurring protein structure microenvironments and discovery of novel functional sites around CYS residues, BMC Struct. Biol, 10, 4, 10.1186/1472-6807-10-4 · DOI
  21. 2019, Pocket similarity identifies selective estrogen receptor modulators as microtubule modulators at the taxane site, Nat. Commun, 10, 1033, 10.1038/s41467-019-08965-w · DOI
  22. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002326 · DOI
  23. 2019, Computational analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity using structural knowledge, Bioinformatics, 35, 235, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty582 · DOI
  24. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003589 · DOI
  25. Torng, W. & Altman, R. B. Graph convolutional neural networks for predicting Drug-Target interactions (2019). · DOI
  26. 2007, Clustering protein environments for function prediction: finding PROSITE motifs in 3D, BMC Bioinforma, 8, S10, 10.1186/1471-2105-8-S4-S10 · DOI
  27. Baek, M. , et al. Efficient and accurate prediction of protein structure using RoseTTAFold2 (2023). · DOI
  28. 10.1038/s41467-021-27838-9 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1126/science.add2187 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 2023, De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion, Nature, 620, 1089, 10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Townshend, R. J. L. , et al. ATOM3D: Tasks on molecules in three dimensions. In Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 1) (2021).
  32. 2023, Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense, Science, 0, eadg7492
  33. van Kempen, M. et al. Fast and accurate protein structure search with foldseek. Nat. Biotechnol. (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  34. Su, J. , et al. SaProt: Protein language modeling with structure-aware vocabulary (2023). · DOI
  35. Heinzinger, M. , Weissenow, K. , Sanchez, J. G. , Henkel, A. & others. ProstT5: Bilingual language model for protein sequence and structure. bioRxiv (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  36. Derry, A. & Altman, R. B . COLLAPSE: A representation learning framework for identification and characterization of protein structural sites. Protein Sci. e4541 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  37. Derry, A. & Altman, R. B. Explainable protein function annotation using local structure embeddings. bioRxiv (2023). · DOI
  38. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg224 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/nar/gks966 · DOI
  40. Kryshtafovych, A. , Schwede, T. , Topf, M. , Fidelis, K. & Moult, J. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round XIII (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  41. Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. L. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015 - Conference Track Proceedings (2015).
  42. 10.1093/nar/gkv1082 · DOI
  43. 10.1021/ci600342e · DOI
  44. 10.1038/nbt1358 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1093/NAR/GKAC1052 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Famiglietti, M. L. et al. An enhanced workflow for variant interpretation in UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot improves consistency and reuse in ClinVar. Database 2019 (2019). · DOI
  47. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1038/nrd773 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/s41573-021-00195-4 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/nchembio.117 · DOI
  51. 10.1021/jm901132v · DOI
  52. 10.1007/s10479-011-0841-3 · DOI
  53. 2020, Discovery of novel Gain-of-Function mutations guided by Structure-Based deep learning, ACS Synth. Biol, 9, 2927, 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00345 · DOI
  54. Ljungdahl, A. , et al. AlphaMissense is better correlated with functional assays of missense impact than earlier prediction algorithms. bioRxiv (2023). · DOI
  55. McDonald, E. F. , Oliver, K. E. , Schlebach, J. P. , Meiler, J. & Plate, L. Benchmarking AlphaMissense pathogenicity predictions against cystic fibrosis variants. bioRxiv (2023). · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Derry, A., & Altman, R. B.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Altman, Russ B.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-12-05
Volume
41
Issue
7
ISSN
1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411695327
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Stanford Research Computing Center, Stanford University
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM102365, R35GM153195)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (T32LM012409)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein structure, self-supervised deep learning, protein representation, protein structure search, pathogenic variants, AlphaFold, Protein Data Bank, protein function
MeSH terms
Unsupervised Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Computational Biology, Amino Acid Motifs, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review