The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
COLLAPSE: A representation learning framework for identification and characterization of protein structural sites
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/pro.4541
Abstract
The identification and characterization of the structural sites which contribute to protein function are crucial for understanding biological mechanisms, evaluating disease risk, and developing targeted therapies. However, the quantity of known protein structures is rapidly outpacing our ability to functionally annotate them. Existing methods for function prediction either do not operate on local sites, suffer from high false positive or false negative rates, or require large site-specific training datasets, necessitating the development of new computational methods for annotating functional sites at scale. We present COLLAPSE (Compressed Latents Learned from Aligned Protein Structural Environments), a framework for learning deep representations of protein sites. COLLAPSE operates directly on the 3D positions of atoms surrounding a site and uses evolutionary relationships between homologous proteins as a self-supervision signal, enabling learned embeddings to implicitly capture structure-function relationships within each site. Our representations generalize across disparate tasks in a transfer learning context, achieving state-of-the-art performance on standardized benchmarks (protein-protein interactions and mutation stability) and on the prediction of functional sites from the P rosite database. We use COLLAPSE to search for similar sites across large protein datasets and to annotate proteins based on a database of known functional sites. These methods demonstrate that COLLAPSE is computationally efficient, tunable, and interpretable, providing a general-purpose platform for computational protein analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 68
- 10.1093/nar/gkt1130 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkt1243 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkx1012 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444902003451 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky995 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gky1100) · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gki418 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gks1234 · DOI
- 2021, PredictProtein - Predicting Protein Structure and Function for 29 Years, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, W535, 10.1093/nar/gkab354 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000605 · DOI
- 10.1093/protein/12.2.85 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.08.057 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gks1067 · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/3.3.252 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1993 · DOI
- 10.1101/2021.09.20.461077 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz595 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-20241-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/75556 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2022.04.18.488641 · DOI
- 2020, Exploring the computational methods for protein-ligand binding site prediction, Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J, 18, 417, 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.02.008 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-022-01490-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 2017, GASS-WEB: a web server for identifying enzyme active sites based on genetic algorithms, Nucleic Acids Res, 45, W315, 10.1093/nar/gkx337 · DOI
- 2014, High precision prediction of functional sites in protein structures, PLoS One, 9, e91240, 10.1371/journal.pone.0091240 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty813 · DOI · Paper page
- 2008, Characterizing the microenvironment surrounding protein sites, Protein Sci, 4, 622, 10.1002/pro.5560040404 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003589 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002326 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature14539 · DOI · Paper page
- Oquab, M. , Bottou, L. , Laptev, I. & Sivic, J. Learning and Transferring Mid-level Image Representations Using Convolutional Neural Networks. in 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1717–1724 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- Hu, W. , et al. Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networks. arXiv [cs.LG] (2019).
- Duvenaud, D. , et al. Convolutional Networks on Graphs for Learning Molecular Fingerprints. arXiv [cs.LG] (2015).
- Gilmer, J. , Schoenholz, S. S. , Riley, P. F. , Vinyals, O. & Dahl, G. E . Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistry. arXiv [cs.LG ] (2017).
- Rives, A. et al. Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences. bioRxiv 622803 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/622803 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, Unified rational protein engineering with sequence-based deep representation learning, Nat. Methods, 16, 1315, 10.1038/s41592-019-0598-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhang, Z. , et al. Protein Representation Learning by Geometric Structure Pretraining. arXiv [cs.LG] (2022).
- 2020, Bootstrap your own latent - A new approach to self-supervised learning, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst, 33, 21271
- Jing, B. , Eismann, S. , Suriana, P. , Townshend, R. J. L. & Dror, R . Learning from Protein Structure with Geometric Vector Perceptrons. arXiv [q-bio.BM ] (2020).
- Jing, B. , Eismann, S. , Soni, P. N. & Dror, R. O . Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for 3D Macromolecular Structure. arXiv [cs.LG ] (2021).
- Chen, X. & He, K . Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learning. arXiv [cs.CV ] (2020). · DOI · Paper page
- Che, F. et al. Self-supervised Graph Representation Learning via Bootstrapping. arXiv [cs.LG ] (2020). · DOI
- 2022, Learning meaningful representations of protein sequences, Nat. Commun, 13, 1914, 10.1038/s41467-022-29443-w · DOI
- 10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00260-8 · DOI
- Townshend, R. J. L. , et al. ATOM3D: Tasks on Molecules in Three Dimensions. in Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 1) (2021).
- 2020, Deciphering interaction fingerprints from protein molecular surfaces using geometric deep learning, Nat. Methods, 17, 184, 10.1038/s41592-019-0666-6 · DOI
- Xin & Radivojac . Computational Methods for Identification of Functional Residues in Protein Structures. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 12, (2011). · DOI
- Steinegger, M. et al. HH-suite3 for fast remote homology detection and deep protein annotation. BMC Bioinformatics 20, 473 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
- Rives, A. et al. Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118, (2021). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00628 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkq366 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2022.02.07.479398 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2022.01.04.474934 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00775-014-1128-3 · DOI
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Training data composition affects performance of protein structure analysis algorithms, Pac. Symp. Biocomput, 27, 10
- 10.1101/2021.09.26.461876 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2022.06.02.494367 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkg087 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkz991 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg224 · DOI
- Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. L. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. in 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015 - Conference Track Proceedings (2015).
- 10.1101/2022.04.10.487779 · DOI
- 2021, Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs, IEEE Trans. Big Data, 7, 535, 10.1109/TBDATA.2019.2921572 · DOI · Paper page
- Anand, N. et al. Protein sequence design with a learned potential. Nat. Commun. 1–11 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
- Torng, W. & Altman, R. B . 3D deep convolutional neural networks for amino acid environment similarity analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 18, 302 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
- Hermosilla, P. , et al. Intrinsic-Extrinsic Convolution and Pooling for Learning on 3D Protein Structures. arXiv [cs.LG] (2020).
Metadata
- Authors
- Derry, A., & Altman, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Altman, Russ B.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-07-22
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e4541-e4541
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9847082
- OpenAlex
- W4311573042
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
- National Institutes of Health
- Stanford Research Computing Center, Stanford University
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM102365)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (LM012409, T32LM012409)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- functional site prediction, representation learning, protein structure-function relationship, self-supervised learning, homologous proteins, transfer learning, protein-protein interaction, mutation stability, PROSITE, protein annotation
- MeSH terms
- Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review