PreprintCited by 16Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

COLLAPSE: A representation learning framework for identification and characterization of protein structural sites

Open access
Derry, Alexander, Altman, Russ B.·2022·Protein Science

Preprint — published as 10.1002/pro.4541

Abstract

The identification and characterization of the structural sites which contribute to protein function are crucial for understanding biological mechanisms, evaluating disease risk, and developing targeted therapies. However, the quantity of known protein structures is rapidly outpacing our ability to functionally annotate them. Existing methods for function prediction either do not operate on local sites, suffer from high false positive or false negative rates, or require large site-specific training datasets, necessitating the development of new computational methods for annotating functional sites at scale. We present COLLAPSE (Compressed Latents Learned from Aligned Protein Structural Environments), a framework for learning deep representations of protein sites. COLLAPSE operates directly on the 3D positions of atoms surrounding a site and uses evolutionary relationships between homologous proteins as a self-supervision signal, enabling learned embeddings to implicitly capture structure-function relationships within each site. Our representations generalize across disparate tasks in a transfer learning context, achieving state-of-the-art performance on standardized benchmarks (protein-protein interactions and mutation stability) and on the prediction of functional sites from the P rosite database. We use COLLAPSE to search for similar sites across large protein datasets and to annotate proteins based on a database of known functional sites. These methods demonstrate that COLLAPSE is computationally efficient, tunable, and interpretable, providing a general-purpose platform for computational protein analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.07.20.500713

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. 10.1093/nar/gkt1130 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/nar/gkt1243 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/nar/gkx1012 · DOI
  4. 10.1107/S0907444902003451 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/nar/gky995 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1093/nar/gky1100) · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1093/nar/gki418 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/nar/gks1234 · DOI
  9. 2021, PredictProtein - Predicting Protein Structure and Function for 29 Years, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, W535, 10.1093/nar/gkab354 · DOI
  10. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000605 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/protein/12.2.85 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.08.057 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/nar/gks1067 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/bib/3.3.252 · DOI
  15. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1993 · DOI
  16. 10.1101/2021.09.20.461077 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz595 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/s41467-020-20241-w · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1038/75556 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1101/2022.04.18.488641 · DOI
  21. 2020, Exploring the computational methods for protein-ligand binding site prediction, Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J, 18, 417, 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.02.008 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41592-022-01490-7 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 2017, GASS-WEB: a web server for identifying enzyme active sites based on genetic algorithms, Nucleic Acids Res, 45, W315, 10.1093/nar/gkx337 · DOI
  24. 2014, High precision prediction of functional sites in protein structures, PLoS One, 9, e91240, 10.1371/journal.pone.0091240 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty813 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 2008, Characterizing the microenvironment surrounding protein sites, Protein Sci, 4, 622, 10.1002/pro.5560040404 · DOI
  27. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003589 · DOI
  28. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002326 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/nature14539 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Oquab, M. , Bottou, L. , Laptev, I. & Sivic, J. Learning and Transferring Mid-level Image Representations Using Convolutional Neural Networks. in 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1717–1724 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  31. Hu, W. , et al. Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networks. arXiv [cs.LG] (2019).
  32. Duvenaud, D. , et al. Convolutional Networks on Graphs for Learning Molecular Fingerprints. arXiv [cs.LG] (2015).
  33. Gilmer, J. , Schoenholz, S. S. , Riley, P. F. , Vinyals, O. & Dahl, G. E . Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistry. arXiv [cs.LG ] (2017).
  34. Rives, A. et al. Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences. bioRxiv 622803 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/622803 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  35. 2019, Unified rational protein engineering with sequence-based deep representation learning, Nat. Methods, 16, 1315, 10.1038/s41592-019-0598-1 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Zhang, Z. , et al. Protein Representation Learning by Geometric Structure Pretraining. arXiv [cs.LG] (2022).
  37. 2020, Bootstrap your own latent - A new approach to self-supervised learning, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst, 33, 21271
  38. Jing, B. , Eismann, S. , Suriana, P. , Townshend, R. J. L. & Dror, R . Learning from Protein Structure with Geometric Vector Perceptrons. arXiv [q-bio.BM ] (2020).
  39. Jing, B. , Eismann, S. , Soni, P. N. & Dror, R. O . Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for 3D Macromolecular Structure. arXiv [cs.LG ] (2021).
  40. Chen, X. & He, K . Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learning. arXiv [cs.CV ] (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  41. Che, F. et al. Self-supervised Graph Representation Learning via Bootstrapping. arXiv [cs.LG ] (2020). · DOI
  42. 2022, Learning meaningful representations of protein sequences, Nat. Commun, 13, 1914, 10.1038/s41467-022-29443-w · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00260-8 · DOI
  44. Townshend, R. J. L. , et al. ATOM3D: Tasks on Molecules in Three Dimensions. in Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 1) (2021).
  45. 2020, Deciphering interaction fingerprints from protein molecular surfaces using geometric deep learning, Nat. Methods, 17, 184, 10.1038/s41592-019-0666-6 · DOI
  46. Xin & Radivojac . Computational Methods for Identification of Functional Residues in Protein Structures. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 12, (2011). · DOI
  47. Steinegger, M. et al. HH-suite3 for fast remote homology detection and deep protein annotation. BMC Bioinformatics 20, 473 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  48. Rives, A. et al. Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118, (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00628 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1093/nar/gkq366 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1101/2022.02.07.479398 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1101/2022.01.04.474934 · DOI
  53. 10.1007/s00775-014-1128-3 · DOI
  54. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 2022, Training data composition affects performance of protein structure analysis algorithms, Pac. Symp. Biocomput, 27, 10
  56. 10.1101/2021.09.26.461876 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1101/2022.06.02.494367 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1093/nar/gkg087 · DOI
  59. 10.1093/nar/gkz991 · DOI
  60. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg224 · DOI
  61. Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. L. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. in 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015 - Conference Track Proceedings (2015).
  62. 10.1101/2022.04.10.487779 · DOI
  63. 2021, Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs, IEEE Trans. Big Data, 7, 535, 10.1109/TBDATA.2019.2921572 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Anand, N. et al. Protein sequence design with a learned potential. Nat. Commun. 1–11 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  65. Torng, W. & Altman, R. B . 3D deep convolutional neural networks for amino acid environment similarity analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 18, 302 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Hermosilla, P. , et al. Intrinsic-Extrinsic Convolution and Pooling for Learning on 3D Protein Structures. arXiv [cs.LG] (2020).

Metadata

Authors
Derry, A., & Altman, R. B.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Altman, Russ B.
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-07-22
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
e4541-e4541
ISSN
0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311573042
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Stanford Research Computing Center, Stanford University
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM102365)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (LM012409, T32LM012409)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
functional site prediction, representation learning, protein structure-function relationship, self-supervised learning, homologous proteins, transfer learning, protein-protein interaction, mutation stability, PROSITE, protein annotation
MeSH terms
Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review