The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating the ability of deep learning-based structure prediction to extrapolate and/or enrich the set of antibody CDR canonical forms
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1352703 · Paper page
Abstract
Deep learning models have been shown to accurately predict protein structure from sequence, allowing researchers to explore protein space from the structural viewpoint. In this paper we explore whether “novel” features, such as distinct loop conformations can arise from these predictions despite not being present in the training data. Here we have used ABodyBuilder2, a deep learning antibody structure predictor, to predict the structures of ∼1.5M paired antibody sequences. We examined the predicted structures of the canonical CDR loops and found that most of these predictions fall into the already described CDR canonical form structural space. We also found a small number of “new” canonical clusters composed of heterogeneous sequences united by a common sequence motif and loop conformation. Analysis of these novel clusters showed their origins to be either shapes seen in the training data at very low frequency or shapes seen at high frequency but at a shorter sequence length. To evaluate explicitly the ability of ABodyBuilder2 to extrapolate, we retrained several models whilst with-holding all antibody structures of a specific CDR loop length or canonical form. These “starved” models showed evidence of generalisation across CDRs of different lengths, but they did not extrapolate to loop conformations which were highly distinct from those present in the training data. However, the models were able to accurately predict a canonical form even if only a very small number of examples of that shape were in the training data. Our results suggest that deep learning protein structure prediction methods are unable to make completely out-of-domain predictions for CDR loops. However, in our analysis we also found that even minimal amounts of data of a structural shape allow the method to recover its original predictive abilities. We have made the ∼1.5 M predicted structures used in this study available to download at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10280181 .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
AlphaFold and Implications for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Ruff, K. M., & Pappu, R. V. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167208 · Cited by 635 · cited 1×
“While extrapolation by deep neural networks is theoretically plausible (Balestriero et al., 2021; Fan-njiang and Listgarten, 2023) searching for evidence of this is difficult and requires extensive classification of training data and the resulting predictions.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1038/s42003-023-04927-7 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gku1106 · DOI
- 10.1101/2022.11.20.517210 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb01955.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.48550/arXiv.2110.09485 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s42003-023-04927-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90078-8 · DOI
- 10.48550/arXiv.2308.05777 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.4353 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90412-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/342877a0 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv552 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkt1043 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005659 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.48550/arXiv.2306.00872 · DOI
- 10.1038/312271a0 · DOI
- Guloglu, B. , Deane, C.M. , 2023. Specific attributes of the VL domain influence both the structure and structural variability of CDR-H3 through steric effects. Front. Immunol. 14. · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4662 · DOI
- 10.1101/2022.10.12.511988 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.1800708 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1323862111 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkx971 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-0716-2609-21 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00255 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.030 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/19420862.2016.1158370 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.4205 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab881 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.25291 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nri2941 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkab1050 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.22309 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx469 · DOI
- 10.21105/joss.01686 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty877 · DOI
- Wong, W.K. , Leem, J. , Deane, C.M. , 2019b. Comparative Analysis of the CDR Loops of Antigen Receptors. Front. Immunol. 10. · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkt382 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenshields-Watson, A., Abanades, B., & Deane, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Deane, Charlotte M
- Venue
- Frontiers in Immunology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-12-09
- Volume
- 15
- Pages
- 1352703-1352703
- ISSN
- 1664-3224 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10933040
- OpenAlex
- W4392236438
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/S024093, EP/S024093/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Keywords
- antibody structure prediction, CDR loops, loop conformation, sequence-structure mapping, limited training data
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Antibodies, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Complementarity Determining Regions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review