PreprintCited by 5Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenomics and Rare DiseasesCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transposase-Assisted Tagmentation: An Economical and Scalable Strategy for Single-Worm Whole-Genome Sequencing

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1093/g3journal/jkae094 · Paper page

Abstract

AlphaMissense identifies 23 million human missense variants as likely pathogenic, but only 0.1% have been clinically classified. To experimentally validate these predictions, chemical mutagenesis presents a rapid, cost-effective method to produce billions of mutations in model organisms. However, the prohibitive costs and limitations in the throughput of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) technologies, crucial for variant identification, constrain its widespread application. Here, we introduce a Tn5 transposase-assisted tagmentation technique for conducting WGS in C. elegans , E. coli , S. cervisiae , and C. reinhardtii . This method, demands merely 20 minutes of hands-on time for a single worm or single-cell clones and incurs a cost below 10 US dollars. It effectively pinpoints causal mutations in mutants defective in cilia or neurotransmitter secretion and in mutants synthetically sterile with a variant analogous to the oncogenic BRAF(V600E) mutation. Integrated with chemical mutagenesis, our approach can generate and identify missense variants economically and efficiently, facilitating experimental investigations of missense variants in diverse species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.12.21.572713

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1. WGS by direct tagmentation of a single-worm. a) Scheme of single-worm WGS construction. b) The log2 (depth) distribution along chromosome I position 0–500,000 from a single-worm or about 1,000 worms. c) The read quantification of the depth from a single-worm or about 1,000 worms. d) Percentage of the coverage of each chromosome from a single-worm with 15-h PK digestion.
Fig. 1. WGS by direct tagmentation of a single-worm. a) Scheme of single-worm WGS construction. b) The log2 (depth) distribution along chromosome I position 0–500,000 from a single-worm or about 1,000 worms. c) The read quantification of the depth from a single-worm or about 1,000 worms. d) Percentage of the coverage of each chromosome from a single-worm with 15-h PK digestion.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2. The single-worm WGS identified mutations responsible for mutant phenotypes. a) An integrative genomics viewer (IGV) window shows the mutation site of the dyf-5 mutant. b) Percentages of Dye-filling positive dyf-5 mutant and the dyf-5 rescue worms. n > 50. c) An IGV window shows the mutation site of the unc-18 mutant. d) Percentages of Unc behavior unc-18 mutant and the unc-18 rescue worms. n > 50.
Fig. 2. The single-worm WGS identified mutations responsible for mutant phenotypes. a) An integrative genomics viewer (IGV) window shows the mutation site of the dyf-5 mutant. b) Percentages of Dye-filling positive dyf-5 mutant and the dyf-5 rescue worms. n > 50. c) An IGV window shows the mutation site of the unc-18 mutant. d) Percentages of Unc behavior unc-18 mutant and the unc-18 rescue worms. n > 50.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3. The single-worm WGS identified mutations from a sterile mutant. a) An Jalview window shows a part of the alignment between the human BRAF and C. elegans LIN-45. b) Representative images of the vulva of lin-45(V627E) treated with meg-3 RNAi and lin-45(V627E); meg-3. For 10× magnification images, scale bar is 100 µm. For 100× magnification images, scale bar is 10 µm.
Fig. 3. The single-worm WGS identified mutations from a sterile mutant. a) An Jalview window shows a part of the alignment between the human BRAF and C. elegans LIN-45. b) Representative images of the vulva of lin-45(V627E) treated with meg-3 RNAi and lin-45(V627E); meg-3. For 10× magnification images, scale bar is 100 µm. For 100× magnification images, scale bar is 10 µm.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4. Effective single-clone WGS in bacteria, yeast, and algae. a) The log2(depth) distribution along the chromosome from a single-clone or multiple-clones of E. coli. b) The log2(depth) distribution along Chromosome I from a single-clone or multiple-clones of C. reinhardtii. c) The log2(depth) distribution along Chromosome I from a single-clone or multiple-clones of S. cerevisiae.
Fig. 4. Effective single-clone WGS in bacteria, yeast, and algae. a) The log2(depth) distribution along the chromosome from a single-clone or multiple-clones of E. coli. b) The log2(depth) distribution along Chromosome I from a single-clone or multiple-clones of C. reinhardtii. c) The log2(depth) distribution along Chromosome I from a single-clone or multiple-clones of S. cerevisiae.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1126/science.adg7492 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.1231143 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.1232033 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/s41467-018-04252-2 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/s43586-022-00098-7 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nrg730 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0165-1218(84)90033-8 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nrg794 · DOI
  9. 10.1051/medsci/20031967725 · DOI
  10. 10.1101/gr.157651.113 · DOI
  11. 10.1101/gr.9.9.859 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.86.14.5345 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/genetics/125.2.275 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/0471142727.mb1303bs82 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0027-5107(69)90046-3 · DOI
  16. 10.1126/science.289.5476.77 · DOI
  17. 10.1128/JB.00524-07 · DOI
  18. 10.7554/eLife.54919 · DOI
  19. 10.1073/pnas.1919800117 · DOI
  20. 10.1534/g3.117.300257 · DOI
  21. 10.1101/gr.177881.114 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/nature18606 · DOI
  23. 10.1126/science.aat5641 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/s41467-020-18035-1 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.09.019 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/nature03818 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/0012-1606(85)90443-9 · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.0606974104 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.1009437108 · DOI
  30. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-12-04772.1999 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/nature00766 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1038/nature25478 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.044 · DOI
  34. 10.1534/genetics.118.301307 · DOI
  35. 10.1053/j.semdp.2015.02.010 · DOI
  36. 10.1186/1476-4598-5-2 · DOI
  37. 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2013.04.01 · DOI
  38. 10.1210/jc.2006-1613 · DOI
  39. 10.7554/eLife.52896 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/genetics/131.3.609 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/cm.970200108 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/nar/gkz966 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/genetics/164.2.731 · DOI
  44. 10.1073/pnas.76.11.5818 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04966.x · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Z., Ke, J., Guo, Z., Wang, Y., Lei, K., Wang, S., Chen, G., shen, Z., Li, W., & Ou, G.
Affiliations
  • Center for Life Sciences (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ou, Guangshuo
Venue
G3 Genes Genomes Genetics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-12-21
Volume
14
Issue
7
ISSN
2160-1836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399497879
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • G3 Genes Genomes Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32270721, 32071191, 31970180, 32021002, 31900535, 2017YFA0102900, 32070706, 31971160, 31991190)
  • Tsinghua University
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFA0503501, 2017YFA0102900, 2019YFA0508401)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
Tn5 transposase, whole genome sequencing, low-cost sequencing, chemical mutagenesis, missense mutations, AlphaMissense, Caenorhabditis elegans, Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, BRAF V600E mutation, single-cell clones
MeSH terms
Whole Genome Sequencing, Animals, Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Caenorhabditis elegans, Transposases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review