PreprintCited by 47Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsProtein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

De Novo Atomic Protein Structure Modeling for Cryo-EM Density Maps Using 3D Transformer and Hidden Markov Model

Open access
Giri, Nabin, Cheng, Jianlin·2024·Nature Communications

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-024-49647-6

Abstract

Accurately building three-dimensional (3D) atomic structures from 3D cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) density maps is a crucial step in the cryo-EM-based determination of the structures of protein complexes. Despite improvements in the resolution of 3D cryo-EM density maps, the de novo conversion of density maps into 3D atomic structures for protein complexes that do not have accurate homologous or predicted structures to be used as templates remains a significant challenge. Here, we introduce Cryo2Struct, a fully automated ab initio cryo-EM structure modeling method that utilizes a 3D transformer to identify atoms and amino acid types in cryo-EM density maps first, and then employs a novel Hidden Markov Model (HMM) to connect predicted atoms to build backbone structures of proteins. Tested on a standard test dataset of 128 cryo-EM density maps with varying resolutions (2.1 - 5.6 Å) and different numbers of residues (730 - 8,416), Cryo2Struct built substantially more accurate and complete protein structural models than the widely used ab initio method - Phenix in terms of multiple evaluation metrics. Moreover, on a new test dataset of 500 recently released density maps with varying resolutions (1.9 - 4.0 Å) and different numbers of residues (234 - 8,828), it built more accurate models than on the standard dataset. And its performance is rather robust against the change of the resolution of density maps and the size of protein structures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.01.02.573943

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 2023, Improving protein–ligand interaction modeling with cryo-em data, templates, and deep learning in 2021 ligand model challenge, Biomolecules, 13, 132, 10.3390/biom13010132 · DOI
  2. Elham Soltanikazemi , Raj S Roy , Farhan Quadir , Nabin Giri , Alex Morehead , and Jianlin Cheng . Drlcomplex: Reconstruction of protein quaternary structures using deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.13594, 2022. · arXiv
  3. 2022, Artificial intelligence in the prediction of protein–ligand interactions: recent advances and future directions, Briefings in Bioinformatics, 23, bbab476, 10.1093/bib/bbab476 · DOI
  4. Frimpong Boadu , Hongyuan Cao , and Jianlin Cheng . Combining protein sequences and structures with transformers and equivariant graph neural networks to predict protein function. bioRxiv, pages 2023–01, 2023. · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.10.005 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/nar/gkv1126 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102536 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.3390/mi14091674 · DOI
  9. Genki Terashi , Xiao Wang , Devashish Prasad , Tsukasa Nakamura , and Daisuke Kihara . Deepmainmast: integrated protocol of protein structure modeling for cryo-em with deep learning and structure prediction. Nature Methods, pages 1–10, 2023. · DOI
  10. 2018, A fully automatic method yielding initial models from high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy maps, Nature methods, 15, 905, 10.1038/s41592-018-0173-1 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.2017525118 · DOI
  12. Kiarash Jamali , Dari Kimanius , and Sjors Scheres . Modelangelo: automated model building in cryo-em maps. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.00006, 2022. · arXiv
  13. Ashish Vaswani , Noam Shazeer , Niki Parmar , Jakob Uszkoreit , Llion Jones , Aidan N Gomez , L-ukasz Kaiser , and Illia Polosukhin . Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  14. 1986, An introduction to hidden markov models, ieee assp magazine, 3, 4, 10.1109/MASSP.1986.1165342 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1109/PROC.1973.9030 · DOI
  16. 2020, Deep learning to predict protein backbone structure from highresolution cryo-em density maps, Scientific reports, 10, 1
  17. 10.1101/2023.06.14.545024 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 2022, Us-align: universal structure alignments of proteins, nucleic acids, and macromolecular complexes, Nature methods, 19, 1109, 10.1038/s41592-022-01585-1 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Olaf Ronneberger , Philipp Fischer , and Thomas Brox . U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18, pages 234–241. Springer, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Jimmy Lei Ba , Jamie Ryan Kiros , and Geoffrey E Hinton . Layer normalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450, 2016. · arXiv
  21. Mu Gao , Peik Lund-Andersen , Alex Morehead , Sajid Mahmud , Chen Chen , Xiao Chen , Nabin Giri , Raj S Roy , Farhan Quadir , T Chad Effler , et al. High-performance deep learning toolbox for genome-scale prediction of protein structure and function. In 2021 IEEE/ACM Workshop on Machine Learning in High Performance Computing Environments (MLHPC), pages 46–57. IEEE, 2021. · DOI
  22. 2022, Torchmetrics-measuring reproducibility in pytorch, Journal of Open Source Software, 7, 4101, 10.21105/joss.04101 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Giri, N., & Cheng, J.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Jianlin
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-01-02
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
5511-5511
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400201692
Cited by
47
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 9
FWCI
8.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (AC05-00OR22725, DE--AC05--00OR22725, DE-AC05?, 00OR22725)
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (R01GM146340)
  • University of Missouri (R01GM146340)
  • National Institutes of Health (DE-AC05-00OR22725)
  • Office of Science (DEAC05- 00OR22725, AC05-00OR22725)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM146340)
  • Center for Information Technology (R01GM146340)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
cryo-EM density maps, 3D transformer, hidden Markov models, atomic structure prediction, ab initio structure determination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review