The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Insect hosts are nutritional landscapes navigated by fungal pathogens
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/ecy.70015 · Paper page
Abstract
Nutrition can mediate host-pathogen interactions indirectly when specific deficiencies (e.g. iron or glutamine) constrain host immune performance. Nutrition can also directly govern these interactions since invading pathogens colonize finite landscapes of nutritionally variable host tissues that must be optimally foraged during pathogen development. We first used a conceptual framework of nutritional niches to show that insect-pathogenic Metarhizium fungi navigate host landscapes where different tissues vary widely in (protein (P) and carbohydrates (C)). We next tested whether host-specific Metarhizium species have narrower fundamental nutritional niches (FNN) than host-generalists by measuring pathogen performance across an in vitro nutritional landscape simulating a within-host foraging environment. We then tested how developing pathogens navigate nutritional landscapes by developing a liquid-media approach to track pathogen intake of P and C over time. Host-specificity did not govern FNN dimensions as three tested Metarhizium species: 1) grew maximally across C treatments assuming P was present above a lower threshold, and 2) similarly initiated dispersal behaviors and sporulated when either C or P became depleted. However, specialist and generalist pathogens navigated nutritional landscapes differently. The host specialist ( M. acridum ) first prioritized C intake, but generalists ( M. anisopliae , M. robertsii ) prioritized P and C according to their availability. Numbers of known hosts may be insufficient to delimit pathogens as specialists or generalists since diverse hosts do not necessarily comprise diverse nutritional landscapes. Instead, immune responses of hosts and nutritional niche breadth of pathogens are likely co-equal evolutionary drivers of host specificity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Iron in infection and immunity
Cassat, J. E., & Skaar, E. P. (2013) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.04.010 · Cited by 1,214
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- 10.1016/j.tree.2020.03.009 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2019.1220 · DOI
- 10.1890/10-1707.1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1818371116 · DOI
- 10.1016/0169-5347(96)20067-9 · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.245714 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00504.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.10.011 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01529.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0014-4894(57)90002-4 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-2858-6_1 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002357 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/J.1365-2435.2010.01766.X · DOI
- 10.1890/07-0389.1 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature02291 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jip.2008.02.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.simyco.2020.04.001 · DOI
- 10.1006/jipa.1999.4884 · DOI
- 10.1006/jipa.1995.1039 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00294-014-0447-9 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsob.200307 · DOI
- 10.1111/OIK.05418 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-162054 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2007.00153.x · DOI
- 10.1152/physrev.00019.2004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fbr.2021.01.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jip.2011.04.004 · DOI
- 10.1111/ele.12140 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1406075111 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41559-020-01314-x · DOI
- 10.1038/s42003-021-02925-1 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00854 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.08.010 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2002.01128.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02736.x · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.13722 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0268:HNAIDA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1093/icb/icm006 · DOI
- 10.1080/21505594.2017.1405190 · DOI
- 10.1038/cmi.2009.33 · DOI
- 10.1046/J.1365-3059.1997.D01-224.X · DOI
- 10.3389/FMICB.2017.01281 · DOI
- 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1112:BSAEPO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.4161/viru.1.6.12985 · DOI
- 10.1111/2041-210X.13551 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1606128113 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04422.x · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- De Fine Licht, H. H., Csontos, Z., Nielsen, P. J. D. N., Langkilde, E. B., Hansen, A. K. K., & Shik, J. Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-01-04
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e70015-e70015
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11803695
- OpenAlex
- W4407255124
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Ecology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Natur og Univers, Det Frie Forskningsråd (8049-00086A)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Plant and Fungal Interactions Research
- Keywords
- Metarhizium, entomopathogenic fungi, host-pathogen interaction, nutritional niche, host specificity, foraging behavior, Metarhizium acridum, Metarhizium anisopliae, Metarhizium robertsii, host immune response, fungal dispersal
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Insecta, Metarhizium, Host-Pathogen Interactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review