Cited by 394Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies

Ectomycorrhizal fungi decompose soil organic matter using oxidative mechanisms adapted from saprotrophic ancestors

Open access
Shah, Firoz, Nicolás, César, Bentzer, Johan, Ellström, Magnus, Smits, Mark, Rineau, Francois, Canbäck, Björn, Floudas, Dimitrios +11 more·2016·New Phytologist

Abstract

Ectomycorrhizal fungi are thought to have a key role in mobilizing organic nitrogen that is trapped in soil organic matter (SOM). However, the extent to which ectomycorrhizal fungi decompose SOM and the mechanism by which they do so remain unclear, considering that they have lost many genes encoding lignocellulose-degrading enzymes that are present in their saprotrophic ancestors. Spectroscopic analyses and transcriptome profiling were used to examine the mechanisms by which five species of ectomycorrhizal fungi, representing at least four origins of symbiosis, decompose SOM extracted from forest soils. In the presence of glucose and when acquiring nitrogen, all species converted the organic matter in the SOM extract using oxidative mechanisms. The transcriptome expressed during oxidative decomposition has diverged over evolutionary time. Each species expressed a different set of transcripts encoding proteins associated with oxidation of lignocellulose by saprotrophic fungi. The decomposition 'toolbox' has diverged through differences in the regulation of orthologous genes, the formation of new genes by gene duplications, and the recruitment of genes from diverse but functionally similar enzyme families. The capacity to oxidize SOM appears to be common among ectomycorrhizal fungi. We propose that the ancestral decay mechanisms used primarily to obtain carbon have been adapted in symbiosis to scavenge nutrients instead.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.13722

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Baldrian P. 2008 Enzymes of saprotrophic basidiomycetes In: Boddy L, Frankland JC, van West British P, eds. Mycological Society symposia series volume 28. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier, 19– 41.
  2. Hatakka A, Hammel KE. 2010 Fungal biodegradation of lignocellulose In: Hofrichter M, ed. The mycota vol. X, industrial applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer‐Verlag, 319– 340.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shah, F., Nicolás, C., Bentzer, J., Ellström, M., Smits, M., Rineau, F., Canbäck, B., Floudas, D., Carleer, R., Lackner, G., Braesel, J., Hoffmeister, D., Henrissat, B., Ahrén, D., Johansson, T., Hibbett, D. S., Martin, F., Persson, P., & Tunlid, A.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Hasselt University (BE)
  • Centre for Environmental Sciences Hasselt University Building D Agoralaan 3590 Diepenbeek Limburg Belgium
  • Clark University (US)
  • Leibniz-Institut für Naturstoff-Forschung und Infektionsbiologie e. V. - Hans-Knöll-Institut (HKI) (DE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Interactions Arbres-Microorganismes (FR)
Corresponding author
Tunlid, Anders
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-11-03
Volume
209
Issue
4
Pages
1705-1719
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W1912607569
Cited by
394
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 27
FWCI
33.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New Phytologist (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • Clark Digital Commons (Clark University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL AMU (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  • Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in a Changing Climate
  • Laboratory of Excellence ARBRE (ANR-11-LABX-0002-01)
  • Office of Science of the US Department of Energy
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Keywords
ectomycorrhizal fungi, soil organic matter decomposition, oxidative degradation, lignocellulose degradation, gene duplication, gene recruitment, transcriptome, symbiosis evolution, forest soils
MeSH terms
Fungal Proteins, Fungi, Genes, Fungal, Lignin, Organic Chemicals, Oxidation-Reduction, Phylogeny, Soil, Transcription, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Mycorrhizae, Laccase, Secondary Metabolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review