PreprintCited by 62Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transferable deep generative modeling of intrinsically disordered protein conformations

Open access
Janson, Giacomo, Feig, Michael·2024·PLoS Computational Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012144 · Paper page

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins have dynamic structures through which they play key biological roles. The elucidation of their conformational ensembles is a challenging problem requiring an integrated use of computational and experimental methods. Molecular simulations are a valuable computational strategy for constructing structural ensembles of disordered proteins but are highly resource-intensive. Recently, machine learning approaches based on deep generative models that learn from simulation data have emerged as an efficient alternative for generating structural ensembles. However, such methods currently suffer from limited transferability when modeling sequences and conformations absent in the training data. Here, we develop a novel generative model that achieves high levels of transferability for intrinsically disordered protein ensembles. The approach, named idpSAM, is a latent diffusion model based on transformer neural networks. It combines an autoencoder to learn a representation of protein geometry and a diffusion model to sample novel conformations in the encoded space. IdpSAM was trained on a large dataset of simulations of disordered protein regions performed with the ABSINTH implicit solvent model. Thanks to the expressiveness of its neural networks and its training stability, idpSAM faithfully captures 3D structural ensembles of test sequences with no similarity in the training set. Our study also demonstrates the potential for generating full conformational ensembles from datasets with limited sampling and underscores the importance of training set size for generalization. We believe that idpSAM represents a significant progress in transferable protein ensemble modeling through machine learning. AUTHOR SUMMARY: Proteins are essential molecules in living organisms and some of them have highly dynamical structures, which makes understanding their biological roles challenging. Disordered proteins can be studied through a combination of computer simulations and experiments. Computer simulations are often resource-intensive. Recently, machine learning has been used to make this process more efficient. The strategy is to learn from previous simulations to model the heterogenous conformations of proteins. However, such methods still suffer from poor transferability, meaning that they tend to make incorrect predictions on proteins not seen in training data. In this study, we present idpSAM, a method based on generative artificial intelligence for modeling the structures of disordered proteins. The model was trained using a vast dataset and, thanks to its architecture and training procedure, it performs well on not just proteins in the training set but achieves high levels transferability to proteins unseen in training. This advancement is a step forward in modeling biologically relevant disordered proteins. It shows how the combination of generative modeling and large training sets and can aid us understand how dynamical proteins behave.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.02.08.579522

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. 2017, Simultaneous quantification of protein order and disorder, Nat Chem Biol, 13, 339, 10.1038/nchembio.2331 · DOI
  2. 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01031 · DOI
  3. 2023, Advancing structural biology through breakthroughs in AI, Curr Op Struct Biol, 80, 102601, 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102601 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.04.003 · DOI
  5. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-072711-164947 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167196 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1126/science.aat4010 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.011 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S1574-1400(09)00503-9 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.1800690115 · DOI
  11. 2023, Modeling concentration-dependent phase separation processes involving peptides and RNA via residue-based coarse-graining, J Chem Theory Comput, 19, 669, 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00856 · DOI
  12. 2009, ABSINTH: a new continuum solvation model for simulations of polypeptides in aqueous solutions, J Comp Chem, 30, 673, 10.1002/jcc.21005 · DOI
  13. 2023, Machine Learning Generation of Dynamic Protein Conformational Ensembles, Molecules, 28, 4047, 10.3390/molecules28104047 · DOI
  14. 10.48550/arXiv.2306.09111 · DOI
  15. 2023, Machine learned coarse-grained protein force-fields: Are we there yet?, Curr Op Struct Biol, 79, 102533, 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102533 · DOI
  16. 10.1146/annurev-physchem-042018-052331 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.48550/ARXIV.2006.11239 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.48550/arXiv.1406.2661 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.48550/arXiv.1312.6114 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1126/science.aaw1147 · DOI
  21. 10.1101/2023.06.25.546443 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Zhang O , Haghighatlari M , Li J , Liu ZH , Namini A , Teixeira J , et al. Learning to evolve structural ensembles of unfolded and disordered proteins using experimental solution data. J Chem Phys. 2023;158. · DOI
  23. 2023, De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion, Nature, 620, 1089, 10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.48550/arXiv.2302.02277 · DOI
  25. 2023, A new age in protein design empowered by deep learning, Cell Syst, 14, 925, 10.1016/j.cels.2023.10.006 · DOI
  26. 10.48550/arXiv.2302.01170 · DOI
  27. 2023, Direct generation of protein conformational ensembles via machine learning, Nat Comm, 14, 774, 10.1038/s41467-023-36443-x · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1073/pnas.1304749110 · DOI
  29. 10.48550/arXiv.2212.09748 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.48550/arXiv.2112.10752 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.48550/arXiv.2204.06125 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 2023, International Conference on Machine Learning, 202, 38592
  33. 10.48550/arXiv.2305.04120 · DOI
  34. 10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 2022, Artificial intelligence guided conformational mining of intrinsically disordered proteins, Commun Biol, 5, 610, 10.1038/s42003-022-03562-y · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00736 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.12.043 · DOI
  38. 2024, One bead per residue can describe all-atom protein structures, Structure, 32, 97, 10.1016/j.str.2023.10.013 · DOI
  39. 10.48550/arXiv.1802.05957 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.48550/arXiv.2010.02502 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 2020, Picomolar Affinity Antagonist and Sustained Signaling Agonist Peptide Ligands for the Adrenomedullin and Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptors, ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci, 3, 759, 10.1021/acsptsci.0c00031 · DOI
  42. 10.1152/physrev.00034.2013 · DOI
  43. 10.1073/pnas.0403643101 · DOI
  44. 10.1101/2022.11.20.517210 · DOI
  45. 10.48550/arXiv.2105.05233 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.48550/arXiv.1806.01261 · DOI
  47. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.48550/arXiv.2310.05297 · DOI
  49. 10.48550/arXiv.2303.01569 · DOI
  50. 2023, Machine learning coarse-grained potentials of protein thermodynamics, Nat Comm, 14, 5739, 10.1038/s41467-023-41343-1 · DOI
  51. 2023, Two for one: Diffusion models and force fields for coarse-grained molecular dynamics, J Chem Theory Comput, 19, 6151, 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00702 · DOI
  52. Aspromonte MC , Nugnes MV , Quaglia F , Bouharoua A , Consortium D , Tosatto SCE , et al. DisProt in 2024: improving function annotation of intrinsically disordered proteins. Nucl Acids Res. 2023. · DOI
  53. The UniProt Consortium, 2022, UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023, Nucl Acids Res, 51, D523, 10.1093/nar/gkac1052 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1021/bi047993o · DOI
  55. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1021/jp003919d · DOI
  57. 10.1073/pnas.0911107107 · DOI
  58. 2003, Replica-exchange multicanonical and multicanonical replica-exchange Monte Carlo simulations of peptides, II. Application to a more complex system. J Chem Phys, 118, 6676
  59. 10.48550/arXiv.2302.05743 · DOI
  60. 10.48550/arXiv.2102.09844 · DOI
  61. 10.1073/pnas.1908241116 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.48550/arXiv.2006.10503 · DOI
  63. 10.48550/arXiv.1802.08219 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.48550/arXiv.2105.04771 · DOI
  65. 10.48550/arXiv.2202.07559 · DOI
  66. 10.1073/pnas.2303499120 · DOI
  67. Schütt KT , Sauceda HE , Kindermans P-J , Tkatchenko A , Müller K-R. SchNet–a deep learning architecture for molecules and materials. J Chem Phys. 2018;148. · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.48550/arXiv.2203.02923 · DOI
  69. 10.48550/arXiv.1912.01703 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 2018, NGLview–interactive molecular graphics for Jupyter notebooks, Bioinformatics, 34, 1241, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx789 · DOI
  71. Boerner TJ , Deems S , Furlani TR , Knuth SL , Towns J. ACCESS: Advancing Innovation: NSF’s Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Coordination Ecosystem: Services & Support. Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing; Portland, OR, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2023. p. 173–6. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Janson, G., & Feig, M.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Feig, Michael
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-02-08
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
e1012144-e1012144
ISSN
1553-734X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4398257517
Cited by
62
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 5
FWCI
8.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2137603, 2138259, 2138296, 2138307, 2138286)
  • Michigan State University
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Institutes of Health (2138307, 2138286, 2138296, 2137603, 2138259)
  • College of Engineering, Michigan State University
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM126948)
  • Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (#2138286, #2138296, 2138259, #2138307, 2137603)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
intrinsically disordered proteins, protein conformational ensembles, deep generative models, latent diffusion models, transferability, molecular dynamics simulation data, autoencoder, training data size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review