PreprintCited by 2,511Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsDigital Media Forensic Detection

Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents

Open access
Ramesh, Aditya, Dhariwal, Prafulla, Nichol, Alex, Chu, Casey, Chen, Mark·2022·arXiv

Abstract

Contrastive models like CLIP have been shown to learn robust representations of images that capture both semantics and style. To leverage these representations for image generation, we propose a two-stage model: a prior that generates a CLIP image embedding given a text caption, and a decoder that generates an image conditioned on the image embedding. We show that explicitly generating image representations improves image diversity with minimal loss in photorealism and caption similarity. Our decoders conditioned on image representations can also produce variations of an image that preserve both its semantics and style, while varying the non-essential details absent from the image representation. Moreover, the joint embedding space of CLIP enables language-guided image manipulations in a zero-shot fashion. We use diffusion models for the decoder and experiment with both autoregressive and diffusion models for the prior, finding that the latter are computationally more efficient and produce higher-quality samples.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2204.06125

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Advanced techniques that edit individual training frames, such as text-to-image models, are slow, costly, and error-prone.

    “While more sophisticated methods for partially editing individual frames during training exist (e.g., text-to-image models [13], [14]), they are slow, computationally expensive and error-prone.”

    From Language-Based Augmentation to Address Shortcut Learning in Object-Goal Navigation (2023) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Introduction identifies unCLIP as a text-to-image system, and §3.3 (p. 7) describes language-guided manipulation of existing images. §7 (p. 17) reports difficulties with rendered text and complex-scene details, and says improving the latter would require more training and inference compute. The paper does not establish that editing individual training frames with text-to-image models is generally slow, costly, and error-prone. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Generative machines, such as text-to-image algorithms, are contributing to the variety of cultural traits.

    “Generative machines, such as text-to-image algorithms, are contributing to the variety of cultural traits.”

    From Machine culture (2023) · cites this paper as [20]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [23][23] Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. GANs Trained by a Two Time-Scale Update Rule Converge to a Local Nash Equilibrium. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017), 2017.
  2. [32][32] Ryan Murdock. The Big Sleep. https://twitter.com/advadnoun/status/ 1351038053033406468, 2021. 20 https://openreview.net/forum?id=qw674L9PfQE https://openreview.net/forum?id=qw674L9PfQE https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.13131 https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.00946 https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.01645 https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661 https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.14822 https://openreview.net/forum?id=qw8AKxfYbI https://openreview.net/forum?id=qw8AKxfYbI https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11239 https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.15282 https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980 https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0312 https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.05101 https://github.com/openai/dalle-2-preview/blob/main/system-card.md https://github.com/openai/dalle-2-preview/blob/main/system-card.md https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.12750 https://twitter.com/advadnoun/status/1351038053033406468 https://twitter.com/advadnoun/status/1351038053033406468 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C., & Chen, M.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224035735
Cited by
2,511
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 429 · 2024: 1113 · 2023: 859 · 2022: 63
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
text-to-image generation, diffusion models, image priors, image variation, photorealism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review