The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DrugDomain: the evolutionary context of drugs and small molecules bound to domains
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/pro.5116 · Paper page
Abstract
Interactions between proteins and small organic compounds play a crucial role in regulating protein functions. These interactions can modulate various aspects of protein behavior, including enzymatic activity, signaling cascades, and structural stability. By binding to specific sites on proteins, small organic compounds can induce conformational changes, alter protein-protein interactions, or directly affect catalytic activity. Therefore, many drugs available on the market today are small molecules (72% of all approved drugs in the last five years). Proteins are composed of one or more domains: evolutionary units that convey function or fitness either singly or in concert with others. Understanding which domain(s) of the target protein binds to a drug can lead to additional opportunities for discovering novel targets. The Evolutionary Classification Of protein Domains (ECOD) classifies domains into an evolutionary hierarchy that focuses on distant homology. Previously, no structure-based protein domain classification existed that included information about both the interaction between small molecules or drugs and the structural domains of a target protein. This data is especially important for multidomain proteins and large complexes. Here, we present the DrugDomain database that reports the interaction between ECOD domains of human target proteins and DrugBank molecules and drugs. The pilot version of DrugDomain describes the interaction of 5,160 DrugBank molecules associated with 2,573 human proteins. It describes domains for all experimentally determined structures of these proteins and incorporates AlphaFold models when such structures are unavailable. The DrugDomain database is available online: http://prodata.swmed.edu/DrugDomain/
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications
Akdel, M., Pires, D. E. V., Pardo, E. P., Jänes, J., Zalevsky, A. O., Mészáros, B., Bryant, P., Good, L. L., Laskowski, R. A., Pozzati, G., et al. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00849-w · Cited by 675
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 2023, How many kinases are druggable?, A review of our current understanding. Biochem J, 480, 1331
- 10.1093/nar/gkz1064 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkm611 · DOI
- 2010, Domain-ligand mapping for enzymes, J Mol Recognit, 23, 194, 10.1002/jmr.992 · DOI
- 10.1042/BST0370751 · DOI
- 10.1021/jm040804f · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003926 · DOI · Paper page
- de la Torre BG , Albericio F. (2024) The pharmaceutical industry in 2023: An analysis of fda drug approvals from the perspective of molecules. Molecules. 29(3). · DOI
- 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4335 · DOI
- 2023, Alphafill: Enriching alphafold models with ligands and cofactors, Nat Methods, 20, 205, 10.1038/s41592-022-01685-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkac956 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471-2105-13-S6-S11 · DOI
- 2021, Biologics vs, Small molecules: Drug costs and patient access. Medicine in Drug Discovery, 9, 100075
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.166788 · DOI
- 2019, Functional analysis of rossmann-like domains reveals convergent evolution of topology and reaction pathways, PLoS Comput Biol, 15, e1007569, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007569 · DOI
- 2023, Pan-cancer structurome reveals overrepresentation of beta sandwiches and underrepresentation of alpha helical domains, Sci Rep, 13, 11988, 10.1038/s41598-023-39273-5 · DOI
- 2023, Pathogenic mutation hotspots in protein kinase domain structure, Protein Sci, 32, e4750, 10.1002/pro.4750 · DOI
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAA913 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12860-019-0204-5 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2214069120 · DOI
- 2024, Ecod domain classification of 48 whole proteomes from alphafold structure database using dpam2, PLoS Comput Biol, 20, e1011586, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011586 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Cath: Increased structural coverage of functional space, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, D266, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1079 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gky1049 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Structure-based view of the druggable genome, Drug Discov Today, 25, 561, 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.02.006 · DOI
- 2010, Identification and characterisation of new inhibitors for the human hematopoietic prostaglandin d2 synthase, Eur J Med Chem, 45, 447, 10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.10.025 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkx1037 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1204117 · DOI
- 2023, Alphafold2 and its applications in the fields of biology and medicine, Signal Transduct Target Ther, 8, 115, 10.1038/s41392-023-01381-z · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Medvedev, K. E., Schaeffer, R. D., & Grishin, N. V.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Medvedev, Kirill E.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-03-23
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e5116-e5116
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11231930
- OpenAlex
- W4400461651
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (GM127390, 2224128)
- Welch Foundation (I‐1505)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM127390, R35GM127390, GM147367, R01GM147367)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
- Keywords
- protein domains, drug-target interactions, small molecules, DrugBank, human protein, multidomain proteins, AlphaFold models, protein-ligand binding, drug discovery targets
- MeSH terms
- Protein Domains, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Protein Binding, Proteins, Evolution, Molecular, Databases, Protein, Small Molecule Libraries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review