The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systems Biology Analysis of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.3390/onco4030013 · Paper page
Abstract
Whole-genome sequencing has revealed that TP53, NOTCH1, ATM, SF3B1, BIRC3, ABL, NXF1, BCR, ZAP70 are often mutated in CLL, but not consistently across all CLL patients. This paper employs a statistical thermo-dynamics approach in combination with the systems biology of the CLL protein-protein interaction networks to identify the most significant participant proteins in the cancerous transformation. Betti number (a topology of complexity) estimates highlight a protein hierarchy, primarily in the Wnt pathway known for aberrant CLL activation. These individually identified proteins suggest a network-targeted strategy over single-target drug development. The findings advocate for a multi-target inhibition approach, limited to several key proteins to minimize side effects, thereby providing a foundation for designing therapies. This study emphasizes a shift towards a comprehensive, multi-scale analysis to enhance personalized treatment strategies for CLL, which could be experimentally validated using siRNA or small molecule inhibitors. The result is not just the identification of these proteins but their rank-order, offering a potent signal amplification in the context of the 20,000 proteins produced by the human body, thus providing a strategic basis for therapeutic intervention in CLL, underscoring the necessity for a more holistic, cellular, chromosomal, and genome-wide study to develop tailored treatments for CLL patients. Author Summary: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is a unique and slowly progressing cancer affecting white blood cells, and research on CLL has highlighted the inconsistency of gene mutations across patients. Using a novel approach that merges statistical thermodynamics and systems biology, this research examines the CLL protein-protein interaction networks to pinpoint proteins integral to the onset of the disease. Betti number (a topology of complexity) estimates, which measure the importance of individual proteins when removed from the network, helped identify numerous potential therapeutic targets, notably within the Wnt signaling pathway, a pathway implicated in various cellular processes and known for its defective expression in CLL. The finding advocates for a multi-target inhibition approach, focusing on several key proteins to minimize side effects, thereby laying a foundation for designing more effective therapies for CLL. This paper emphasizes the potential benefits of a comprehensive study, spanning cellular to genome-wide scales, to design personalized treatments for CLL patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How many human proteoforms are there?
Aebersold, R., Agar, J. N., Amster, I. J., Baker, M. S., Bertozzi, C. R., Boja, E. S., Costello, C. E., Cravatt, B. F., Fenselau, C., Garcia, B. A., et al. (2018) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.2576 · Cited by 907
Research works printed but not linked: 66
- 10.1146/annurev-pathol-020712-163955 · DOI
- 10.3233/CBM-2012-0259 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30422-7 · DOI
- Mukkamalla SKR , Taneja A , Malipeddi D , Master SR . Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. [Updated 2023 Jan 15]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470433/
- 10.3390/can-cers12040894 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2004.00489.x · DOI
- 10.1111/bph.13949 · DOI
- 10.3390/cancers13102468 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12943-019-0954-x · DOI
- 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2016.02.004 · DOI
- 10.1080/13543784.2017.1386173 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102309 · DOI
- 10.3389/fphar.2021.662232 · DOI
- 10.20517/cdr.2021.55 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.202103090 · DOI
- 10.18632/oncotarget.12932 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10867-016-9410-y · DOI
- 10.1186/s13062-015-0058-5 · DOI
- 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.1289 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1201416109 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0226883 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.semcancer.2011.05.003 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrg.2016.98 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature13302 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature13319 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0071462 · DOI
- 10.5114/wo.2014.47136 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkj109 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511803345.015 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gki022 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1132 · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbp034 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth469 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood-2014-01-552067 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood-2012-03-416461 · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.194.11.1639 · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.194.11.1625 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood-2013-09-527234 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac194 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.27 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gki033 · DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/dju245 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp167 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.1239303 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrc2819 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000090 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood-2015-10-674572 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neo.2019.02.003 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1505822112 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep35270 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.275790.121 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.04.016 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12551-018-0489-1 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0168023 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0474 · DOI
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2533 · DOI
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2569 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-019-11582-2 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41591-018-0028-4 · DOI
- 10.4161/cc.25365 · DOI
- 10.2147/TACG.S18669 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature23884 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s13072-022-00473-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gde.2022.101939 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0785 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.06.018 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Pozzati, G., Zhou, J., Hazan, H., Klement, G. L., Siegelmann, H. T., Rietman, E. A., & Tuszynski, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Politecnico di Torino (IT)
- Harvard University (US)
- Tufts University (US)
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Silesian University of Technology (PL)
- Venue
- Onco
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-03-28
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 163-191
- ISSN
- 2673-7523 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4401352446
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Onco (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- chronic lymphocytic leukemia, protein-protein interaction network, Betti numbers, network topology, Wnt signaling, cancer transformation, TP53 mutation, NOTCH1 mutation, B cell receptor signaling, ZAP-70, precision oncology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review