PreprintCited by 8Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Goldfinder : Unraveling Networks of Gene Co-occurrence and Avoidance in Bacterial Pangenomes

Open access
Gavriilidou, Athina, Paulitz, Emilian, Resl, Christian, Ziemert, Nadine, Kupczok, Anne, Baumdicker, Franz·2024·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

The pangenome is the set of all genes present in a prokaryotic species. Most pangenomes contain many accessory genes that are present in only some of the species members. Genes need to function together, and it has been suggested that selection for certain gene combinations affects the structure of prokaryotic pangenomes. Nevertheless, genes might also co-occur simply due to being linked on the genome, and efficient tools are needed to distinguish linkage from co-selection. Here we present Goldfinder, an approach to infer co-occurrence and co-avoidance between gene pairs by taking the phylogenetic relationships of the species into account. The approach is implemented in an efficient Python script available at https://github.com/fbaumdicker/goldfinder . We also provide scripts for clustering co-occurring genes and for visualizing the resulting co-occurrence and co-avoidance networks in Cytoscape. In comparison to the co-occurrence inference tool Coinfinder, Goldfinder finds fewer co-occurring pairs in a real species pangenome, suggesting that fewer spurious associations due to phylogenetic dependencies are detected. We conclude that Goldfinder is a fast and accurate tool to infer gene co-occurrence and co-avoidance, which will enable large-scale analyses to infer co-selected genes across bacterial pangenomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.04.29.591652

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Grouping by an arbitrary taxonomic rank does not remove the problem of non-independence between the ranks.

    “Grouping by an arbitrary taxonomic rank does not remove the problem of non-independence between the ranks19,104.”

    From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [104]

    The available Abstract discusses phylogenetic dependencies in gene co-occurrence analyses, but it does not address grouping by an arbitrary taxonomic rank or whether that grouping resolves non-independence. Searches for those terms and a paraphrase returned no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gavriilidou, A., Paulitz, E., Resl, C., Ziemert, N., Kupczok, A., & Baumdicker, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Baumdicker, Franz
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-05-02
OpenAlex
W4396572111
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
gene co-occurrence, bacterial pangenome, accessory genes, co-selection, genetic linkage, prokaryotic genomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review