PreprintCited by 4Virus-based gene therapy researchCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AAV-mediated genome editing is influenced by the formation of R-loops

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.ymthe.2024.09.035 · Paper page

Abstract

Recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors (rAAV) hold an intrinsic ability to stimulate homologous recombination (AAV-HR) and are the most used in clinical settings for in vivo gene therapy. However, rAAVs also integrate throughout the genome. Here, we describe DNA-RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (DRIP-seq) in murine HEPA1-6 hepatoma cells and whole murine liver to establish the similarities and differences in genomic R-loop formation in a transformed cell line and intact tissue. We show enhanced AAV-HR in mice upon genetic and pharmacological upregulation of R-loops. Selecting the highly expressed Albumin gene as a model locus for genome editing in both in vitro and in vivo experiments showed that the R-loop prone, 3’ end of Albumin was efficiently edited by AAV-HR, whereas the upstream R-loop- deficient region did not result in detectable vector integration. In addition, we found a positive correlation between previously reported off-target rAAV integration sites and R-loop enriched genomic regions. Thus, we conclude that high levels of R-loops, present in highly transcribed genes, promote rAAV vector genome integration. These findings may shed light on potential mechanisms for improving the safety and efficacy of genome editing by modulating R-loops and may enhance our ability to predict regions most susceptible to off-target insertional mutagenesis by rAAV vectors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.05.07.592855

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. 2020, Engineering adeno-associated virus vectors for gene therapy, Nature reviews. Genetics, 21, 255, 10.1038/s41576-019-0205-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2020, Current Clinical Applications of In Vivo Gene Therapy with AAVs, Molecular Therapy, 29, 1
  3. 10.1016/S1525-0016(02)00034-5 · DOI
  4. 10.1089/hum.2011.183 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nature13864 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/s41586-018-0380-z · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/ng1380 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1089/hum.2023.134 · DOI
  9. 10.1128/JVI.79.1.364-379.2005 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 2015, Adeno-associated virus inverted terminal repeats stimulate gene editing, Gene Therapy, 22, 190, 10.1038/gt.2014.109 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 2021, Evaluating the Genomic Parameters Governing rAAV-Mediated Homologous Recombination, Mol Ther, 29, 1028, 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.11.025 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/ng1179 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1038/s41587-023-01974-7 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.0712060105 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/nar/gkl455 · DOI
  16. 2021, Improved Genome Editing through Inhibition of FANCM and Members of the BTR Dissolvase Complex, Molecular Therapy, 29, 1016, 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.10.020 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105307 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.01.024 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.023 · DOI
  20. 10.7554/eLife.17548 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.043 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.10.020 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/S41586-022-05545-9 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.04.014 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/s41586-021-03538-8 · DOI
  26. 2019, High-resolution, strand-specific R-loop mapping via S9.6-based DNA–RNA immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing, Nature Protocols, 14, 1734, 10.1038/s41596-019-0159-1 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/nar/gkaa500 · DOI
  28. Thongthip, S. , Carlson, A. , Crossley, M. P. & Schwer, B . Relationships between genome- wide R-loop distribution and classes of recurrent DNA breaks in neural stem/progenitor cells. Sci Rep 12, 13373 (2022). · DOI
  29. 10.1093/nar/gks955 · DOI
  30. 2020, The regulation and functions of DNA and RNA G-quadruplexes, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 21, 459, 10.1038/s41580-020-0236-x · DOI
  31. 10.7554/eLife.28306 · DOI
  32. Bader, A. S. & Bushell, M . DNA:RNA hybrids form at DNA double-strand breaks in transcriptionally active loci. Cell Death and Disease 11, (2020). · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.10.008 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/s41467-020-17858-2 · DOI
  35. 10.1074/jbc.M117.787473 · DOI
  36. 10.15252/embj.201797208 · DOI
  37. Zhang, T. et al. Loss of TOP3B leads to increased R-loop formation and genome instability. Open Biology 9, (2019). · DOI
  38. 10.1038/nrc1977 · DOI
  39. 2022, Fludarabine increases nuclease-free AAV- and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homologous recombination in mice, Nat Biotechnol, 40, 1285, 10.1038/s41587-022-01240-2 · DOI
  40. 2001, Schedule-dependent activity of topotecan in OVCAR-3 ovarian carcinoma xenograft: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation, Clin Cancer Res, 7, 3222
  41. 10.1101/gad.280834.116 · DOI
  42. 10.1172/JCI79213 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 2023, Intrathymic AAV delivery results in therapeutic site-specific integration at TCR loci in mice, Blood, 141, 2316
  44. 2022, Therapeutic homology-independent targeted integration in retina and liver, Nat Commun, 13, 1963, 10.1038/s41467-022-29550-8 · DOI
  45. 10.1101/2023.07.26.550728 · DOI
  46. Cohen, S. et al. Senataxin resolves RNA:DNA hybrids forming at DNA double-strand breaks to prevent translocations. Nat Commun 9, 533 (2018). · DOI
  47. 10.1038/s41587-020-0741-7 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.06.004 · DOI
  49. Guha, S. & Bhaumik, S. R . Transcription-coupled DNA double-strand break repair. DNA Repair (Amst ) 109, 103211 (2022). · DOI
  50. 10.1038/s41580-022-00474-x · DOI
  51. 2021, Non-homologous end-joining at challenged replication forks: an RNA connection?, Trends in Genetics, 37, 973, 10.1016/j.tig.2021.06.010 · DOI
  52. Zhang, X. et al. Attenuation of RNA polymerase II pausing mitigates BRCA1-associated R-loop accumulation and tumorigenesis. Nat Commun 8, 15908 (2017). · DOI
  53. 2019, R Loops and Their Composite Cancer Connections, Trends in Cancer, 5, 619, 10.1016/j.trecan.2019.08.006 · DOI
  54. 2019, R-Loops in Motor Neuron Diseases, Mol Neurobiol, 56, 2579, 10.1007/s12035-018-1246-y · DOI
  55. 10.1084/jem.20211121 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1038/s41467-022-30604-0 · DOI
  57. 2022, R-loop formation and conformational activation mechanisms of Cas9, Nature, 609, 191, 10.1038/s41586-022-05114-0 · DOI
  58. 2023, Negative DNA supercoiling induces genome-wide Cas9 off-target activity, Molecular Cell, 83, 3533, 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.09.008 · DOI
  59. 10.1074/jbc.REV119.006364 · DOI
  60. 10.1128/JVI.80.1.426-439.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 2019, Using a barcoded AAV capsid library to select for clinically relevant gene therapy vectors, JCI Insight, 4, e131610
  62. 10.1089/cmb.2017.0096 · DOI
  63. 10.1038/nature01262 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTAC166 · DOI
  67. Love, M. I. , Huber, W. & Anders, S . Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15, 550 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1089/omi.2011.0118 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Puzzo, F., Crossley, M. P., Goswami, A., Zhang, F., Pekrun, K., Garzon, J. L., Cimprich, K. A., & Kay, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Kay, Mark A.
Venue
Molecular Therapy
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-05-09
Volume
32
Issue
12
Pages
4256-4271
ISSN
1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403117174
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2146755)
  • Glenn Foundation for Medical Research
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od018220-01, 1s10od021763-01)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL064272, R01HL064274)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM119334, T32GM136631, R01GM119334)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors, R-loops, homologous recombination, genome editing, AAV integration, albumin gene, hepatoma cells, liver, transcribed regions, gene therapy safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review