PreprintCited by 3Genomics and Rare DiseasesCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

TITINdb2 – Expanding Annotation and Structural Information for Protein Variants in the Giant Sarcomeric Protein Titin

Open access
Weston, T., Ng, J. C-F., Gracia Carmona, O., Gautel, M., Fraternali, F.·2024·Bioinformatics Advances

Preprint — published as 10.1093/bioadv/vbaf062 · Paper page

Abstract

Structured Abstract: Summary: We present TITINdb2, an update to the TITINdb database previously constructed to facilitate the identification of pathogenic missense variants in the giant protein titin, which are associated with a variety of skeletal and cardiac myopathies. The database and web portal have been substantially revised and include the following new features: (i) an increase in computational annotation from 4 to 20 variant impact predictors, available through a new custom data table dialogue; (ii) thorough structural coverage of single domains with AlphaFold2 predicted models; (iii) newly predicted domain-domain interface annotations; (iv) an expanded in silico saturation mutagenesis incorporating 4 variant impact predictors; (v) a comprehensive overhaul of available data, including population data sources and variants reported pathogenic in the literature; (vi) A curated mapping of existing protein, transcript and chromosomal sequence positions and a new variant conversion tool to translate variants in one format to any other format. Availability and Implementation: Database accessible via titindb.kcl.ac.uk/TITINdb/ Contact: Franca Fraternali ( f.fraternali@ucl.ac.uk ) Supplementary Information: Available

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.05.08.593166

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Adzhubei I , Jordan DM , Sunyaev SR . Predicting Functional Effect of Human Missense Mutations Using PolyPhen-2. Curr Protoc Hum Genet 2013;07:Unit7.20. · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1093/nar/gkg601 · DOI
  3. 2023, Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense, Science, 0, eadg7492
  4. 10.1038/nmeth.3027 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.03.004 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.016 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/345273a0 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05222.x · DOI
  10. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx424 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nature19057 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 2020, dbNSFP v4: a comprehensive database of transcript-specific functional predictions and annotations for human nonsynonymous and splice-site SNVs, Genome Medicine, 12, 103, 10.1186/s13073-020-00803-9 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a131291 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt691 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1093/nar/gku411 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 2020, Rhapsody: predicting the pathogenicity of human missense variants, Bioinformatics, 36, 3084, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa127 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nature15393 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 2024, Walking with giants: The challenges of variant impact assessment in the giant sarcomeric protein titin, WIREs Mechanisms of Disease, 16, e1638, 10.1002/wsbm.1638 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/pro.3330 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Weston, T., Ng, J. C.-F., Gracia Carmona, O., Gautel, M., & Fraternali, F.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology (GB)
Corresponding author
Fraternali, F.
Venue
Bioinformatics Advances
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-05-10
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
vbaf062-vbaf062
ISSN
2635-0041 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408746407
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Bioinformatics Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Heart Foundation (RG/F/22/110079, RG/15/8/31480)
  • NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/T002212/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
titin, skeletal myopathy, cardiomyopathy, domain-domain interfaces, saturation mutagenesis, variant annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review