The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
T-cell receptor structures and predictive models reveal comparable alpha and beta chain structural diversity despite differing genetic complexity
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s42003-025-07708-6 · Paper page
Abstract
T-cell receptor (TCR) structures are currently under-utilised in early-stage drug discovery and repertoire-scale informatics. Here, we leverage a large dataset of solved TCR structures from Immunocore to evaluate the current state-of-the-art for TCR structure prediction, and identify which regions of the TCR remain challenging to model. Through clustering analyses and the training of a TCR-specific model capable of large-scale structure prediction, we find that the alpha chain VJ-recombined loop (CDRA3) is as structurally diverse and correspondingly difficult to predict as the beta chain VDJ-recombined loop (CDRB3). This differentiates TCR variable domain loops from the genetically analogous antibody loops and supports the conjecture that both TCR alpha and beta chains are deterministic of antigen specificity. We hypothesise that the larger number of alpha chain joining genes compared to beta chain joining genes compensates for the lack of a diversity gene segment. Overall, our study demonstrates that valuable structure-function relationships can lie in alpha chains despite their simpler junctions. We also provide over 1.5M predicted TCR structures to enable repertoire structural analysis and elucidate strategies towards improving the accuracy of future TCR structure predictors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 79
- 10.1038/nri2887 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.047 · DOI
- Kenneth Murphy and Weaver Casey. Janeway’s Immunobiology 9th Edition. 2017. · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2022.893247 · DOI
- 10.1038/s42003-021-02610-3 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-021-04335-w · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbaa318 · DOI
- 10.3390/genes12040572 · DOI
- 10.1371/JOURNAL.PCBI.1008814 · DOI
- 10.15252/msb.20199416 · DOI
- 10.1016/J.COMPBIOLCHEM · DOI
- 10.1038/s42256-021-00383-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTAB294 · DOI
- 10.1038/s42256-023-00619-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/FIMMU.2019.02820/BIBTEX · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.4841 · DOI
- 10.1101/2024.01.22.576714 · DOI
- [18] H. Jabran Zahid , et al. “Large-scale statistical mapping of T-cell receptor β sequences to Human Leukocyte Antigens”. In: BioRxiv (2024). · DOI
- 10.1038/nature22976 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fimmu.2021.712488 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41577-023-00835-3 · DOI
- 10.1101/2022.10.27.514020 · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1228873 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.abo5128 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-024-02240-7 · DOI
- 10.1101/2022.08.05.503004 · DOI · Paper page
- Helen M Berman et al. The Protein Data Bank. Tech. rep. 2000. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/NAR/GKX971 · DOI
- 10.1093/NAR/GKX760 · DOI
- 10.1039/c9me00020h · DOI
- 10.1093/NAR/GKY432 · DOI
- 10.1093/NAR/GKV535 · DOI
- 10.1038/s42003-023-04927-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102545 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102542 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-021-25006-7 · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2021.640725 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.16.1.258 · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.194 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-022-05371-z · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.25291 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.2213264120 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-023-38063-x · DOI
- Matthew Raybould , et al. “The Observed T cell receptor Space database enables paired-chain repertoire mining, coherence analysis and language modelling”. In: Under review (2024). · DOI
- 10.1101/2023.10.30.564251 · DOI · Paper page
- Leo Klarner , et al. “Drug Discovery under Covariate Shift with Domain-Informed Prior Distributions over Functions”. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning (2023).
- 10.3390/diagnostics12010040 · DOI
- 10.1038/s42003-023-04927-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90412-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty877 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.030 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/19420862.2016.1158370 · DOI
- 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fimmu · DOI
- 10.1016/j · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.4205 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/FIMMU.2019.02454/ · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3358 · DOI
- 10.1111/j · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01159.x · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00674 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmolb.2018.00095 · DOI
- 10.1101/2023.05.17.541222 · DOI
- Leo Klarner , et al. “Bias in the Benchmark: Systematic experimental errors in bioactivity databases confound multi-task and meta-learning algorithms”. In: 2nd ICML AI for Science Workshop (2022).
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008781 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009675 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1237621 · DOI · Paper page
- Fŕederic A Dreyer et al. “Inverse folding for antibody sequence design using deep learning”. In: 2023 ICML Workshop on Computational Biology (2023).
- Alissa M Hummer , et al. “AntiFold: Improved antibody structure design using inverse folding”. In: NeurIPS Machine Learning for Structural Biology Workshop (2023).
- 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1223802 · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1080596 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gki010 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00255 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gki065 · DOI
- 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTV552 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
- Laurens Van Der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton . “Visualizing Data using t-SNE”. In: Journal of Machine Learning Research (2008).
- Fabian Pedregosa et al. “Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python”. In: Journal of Machine Learning Research (2011).
Metadata
- Authors
- Quast, N. P., Abanades, B., Guloglu, B., Karuppiah, V., Harper, S., Raybould, M. I. J., & Deane, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Immunocore (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Deane, Charlotte M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Communications Biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-05-21
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 362-362
- ISSN
- 2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11880327
- OpenAlex
- W4408153170
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 5.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (102164/Z/13/Z)
- Research Councils UK (EP/S024093/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Keywords
- T cell receptor, V(D)J recombination, antigen specificity
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, Genetic Variation, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-beta, Complementarity Determining Regions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review