PreprintCited by 22vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesProtein Structure and DynamicsT-cell and B-cell Immunology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

T-cell receptor structures and predictive models reveal comparable alpha and beta chain structural diversity despite differing genetic complexity

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s42003-025-07708-6 · Paper page

Abstract

T-cell receptor (TCR) structures are currently under-utilised in early-stage drug discovery and repertoire-scale informatics. Here, we leverage a large dataset of solved TCR structures from Immunocore to evaluate the current state-of-the-art for TCR structure prediction, and identify which regions of the TCR remain challenging to model. Through clustering analyses and the training of a TCR-specific model capable of large-scale structure prediction, we find that the alpha chain VJ-recombined loop (CDRA3) is as structurally diverse and correspondingly difficult to predict as the beta chain VDJ-recombined loop (CDRB3). This differentiates TCR variable domain loops from the genetically analogous antibody loops and supports the conjecture that both TCR alpha and beta chains are deterministic of antigen specificity. We hypothesise that the larger number of alpha chain joining genes compared to beta chain joining genes compensates for the lack of a diversity gene segment. Overall, our study demonstrates that valuable structure-function relationships can lie in alpha chains despite their simpler junctions. We also provide over 1.5M predicted TCR structures to enable repertoire structural analysis and elucidate strategies towards improving the accuracy of future TCR structure predictors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.05.20.594940

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. 10.1038/nri2887 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.047 · DOI
  3. Kenneth Murphy and Weaver Casey. Janeway’s Immunobiology 9th Edition. 2017. · DOI
  4. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.893247 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s42003-021-02610-3 · DOI
  6. 10.1186/s12859-021-04335-w · DOI
  7. 10.1093/bib/bbaa318 · DOI
  8. 10.3390/genes12040572 · DOI
  9. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PCBI.1008814 · DOI
  10. 10.15252/msb.20199416 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/J.COMPBIOLCHEM · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s42256-021-00383-2 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTAB294 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s42256-023-00619-3 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.3389/FIMMU.2019.02820/BIBTEX · DOI
  16. 10.1002/pro.4841 · DOI
  17. 10.1101/2024.01.22.576714 · DOI
  18. [18] H. Jabran Zahid , et al. “Large-scale statistical mapping of T-cell receptor β sequences to Human Leukocyte Antigens”. In: BioRxiv (2024). · DOI
  19. 10.1038/nature22976 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.712488 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/s41577-023-00835-3 · DOI
  22. 10.1101/2022.10.27.514020 · DOI
  23. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1228873 · DOI
  24. 10.1126/sciadv.abo5128 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/s41592-024-02240-7 · DOI
  26. 10.1101/2022.08.05.503004 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Helen M Berman et al. The Protein Data Bank. Tech. rep. 2000. · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1093/NAR/GKX971 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/NAR/GKX760 · DOI
  30. 10.1039/c9me00020h · DOI
  31. 10.1093/NAR/GKY432 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/NAR/GKV535 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/s42003-023-04927-7 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102545 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102542 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1038/s41467-021-25006-7 · DOI
  37. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.640725 · DOI
  38. 10.1128/MCB.16.1.258 · DOI
  39. 10.1084/jem.194 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/s41586-022-05371-z · DOI
  41. 10.1002/prot.25291 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1073/pnas.2213264120 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/s41467-023-38063-x · DOI
  44. Matthew Raybould , et al. “The Observed T cell receptor Space database enables paired-chain repertoire mining, coherence analysis and language modelling”. In: Under review (2024). · DOI
  45. 10.1101/2023.10.30.564251 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Leo Klarner , et al. “Drug Discovery under Covariate Shift with Domain-Informed Prior Distributions over Functions”. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning (2023).
  47. 10.3390/diagnostics12010040 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/s42003-023-04927-7 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90412-8 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty877 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.030 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1080/19420862.2016.1158370 · DOI
  53. 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.3389/fimmu · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j · DOI
  56. 10.1002/pro.4205 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.3389/FIMMU.2019.02454/ · DOI
  58. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3358 · DOI
  59. 10.1111/j · DOI
  60. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01159.x · DOI
  61. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00674 · DOI
  62. 10.3389/fmolb.2018.00095 · DOI
  63. 10.1101/2023.05.17.541222 · DOI
  64. Leo Klarner , et al. “Bias in the Benchmark: Systematic experimental errors in bioactivity databases confound multi-task and meta-learning algorithms”. In: 2nd ICML AI for Science Workshop (2022).
  65. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008781 · DOI
  66. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009675 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1237621 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Fŕederic A Dreyer et al. “Inverse folding for antibody sequence design using deep learning”. In: 2023 ICML Workshop on Computational Biology (2023).
  69. Alissa M Hummer , et al. “AntiFold: Improved antibody structure design using inverse folding”. In: NeurIPS Machine Learning for Structural Biology Workshop (2023).
  70. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1223802 · DOI
  71. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1080596 · DOI
  72. 10.1093/nar/gki010 · DOI
  73. 10.1371/journal.pcbi · DOI
  74. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00255 · DOI
  75. 10.1093/nar/gki065 · DOI
  76. 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTV552 · DOI
  77. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
  78. Laurens Van Der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton . “Visualizing Data using t-SNE”. In: Journal of Machine Learning Research (2008).
  79. Fabian Pedregosa et al. “Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python”. In: Journal of Machine Learning Research (2011).

Metadata

Authors
Quast, N. P., Abanades, B., Guloglu, B., Karuppiah, V., Harper, S., Raybould, M. I. J., & Deane, C. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Immunocore (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Deane, Charlotte M.
Venue
Communications Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-05-21
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
362-362
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408153170
Cited by
22
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (102164/Z/13/Z)
  • Research Councils UK (EP/S024093/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
T cell receptor, V(D)J recombination, antigen specificity
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, Genetic Variation, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-beta, Complementarity Determining Regions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review