PreprintCited by 16Machine Learning in BioinformaticsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFractal and DNA sequence analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are Genomic Language Models All You Need? Exploring Genomic Language Models on Protein Downstream Tasks

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae529 · Paper page

Abstract

Large language models, trained on enormous corpora of biological sequences, are state-of-the-art for downstream genomic and proteomic tasks. Since the genome contains the information to encode all proteins, genomic language models (gLMs) hold the potential to make downstream predictions not only about DNA sequences, but also about proteins. However, the performance of gLMs on protein tasks remains unknown, due to few tasks pairing proteins with the coding DNA sequences (CDS) that can be processed by gLMs. In this work, we curated five such datasets and used them to evaluate the performance of gLMs and proteomic language models (pLMs). We show that gLMs are competitive and even outperform their pLMs counterparts on some tasks. The best performance was achieved using the retrieved CDS compared to sampling strategies. We found that training a joint genomic-proteomic model outperforms each individual approach, showing that they capture different but complementary sequence representations, as we demonstrate through model interpretation of their embeddings. Lastly, we explored different genomic tokenization schemes to improve downstream protein performance. We trained a new Nucleotide Transformer (50M) foundation model with 3mer tokenization that outperforms its 6mer counterpart on protein tasks while maintaining performance on genomics tasks. The application of gLMs to proteomics offers the potential to leverage rich CDS data, and in the spirit of the central dogma, the possibility of a unified and synergistic approach to genomics and proteomics. We make our inference code, model weights and datasets available.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.05.20.594989

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Jacob Devlin , Ming-Wei Chang , Kenton Lee , and Kristina Toutanova . Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018. · arXiv
  2. 2020, Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21, 1
  3. Zeming Lin , Halil Akin , Roshan Rao , Brian Hie , Zhongkai Zhu , Wenting Lu , Allan dos Santos Costa, Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, Tom Sercu, Sal Candido, et al. Language models of protein sequences at the scale of evolution enable accurate structure prediction. BioRxiv, 2022:500902, 2022.
  4. 2021, Prottrans: Toward understanding the language of life through self-supervised learning, IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 44, 7112
  5. Zeming Lin , Halil Akin , Roshan Rao , Brian Hie , Zhongkai Zhu , Wenting Lu , Nikita Smetanin , Robert Verkuil , Ori Kabeli , Yaniv Shmueli , et al. Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science, 379(6637):1123–1130, 2023. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hugo Dalla-Torre , Liam Gonzalez , Javier Mendoza-Revilla , Nicolas Lopez Carranza , Adam Henryk Grzywaczewski , Francesco Oteri , Christian Dallago , Evan Trop , Hassan Sirelkhatim , Guillaume Richard , et al. The nucleotide transformer: Building and evaluating robust foundation models for human genomics. bioRxiv, pages 2023–01, 2023. · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2021, Dnabert: pre-trained bidirectional encoder representations from transformers model for dna-language in genome, Bioinformatics, 37, 2112, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab083 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Eric Nguyen , Michael Poli , Marjan Faizi , Armin Thomas , Callum Birch-Sykes , Michael Wornow , Aman Patel , Clayton Rabideau , Stefano Massaroli , Yoshua Bengio , et al. Hyenadna: Long-range genomic sequence modeling at single nucleotide resolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.15794, 2023. · arXiv
  9. Gonzalo Benegas , Sanjit Singh Batra , and Yun S Song . Dna language models are powerful zero-shot predictors of non-coding variant effects. BioRxiv, pages 2022–08, 2022. · DOI
  10. Eric Nguyen , Michael Poli , Matthew G Durrant , Armin W Thomas , Brian Kang , Jeremy Sullivan , Madelena Y Ng, Ashley Lewis, Aman Patel, Aaron Lou, et al. Sequence modeling and design from molecular to genome scale with evo. bioRxiv, pages 2024–02, 2024. · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1186/s12964-020-00642-6 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/s42256-024-00791-0 · DOI
  13. 10.1101/2023.09.09.556981 · DOI
  14. Logan Hallee , Nikolaos Rafailidis , and Jason P Gleghorn. cdsbert-extending protein language models with codon awareness. bioRxiv, 2023. · DOI
  15. 10.1038/nature09792 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1093/nar/gkq495 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s11033-021-06749-4 · DOI
  19. Žiga Avsec, Vikram Agarwal, Daniel Visentin, Joseph R Ledsam, Agnieszka Grabska-Barwinska, Kyle R Taylor, Yannis Assael, John Jumper, Pushmeet Kohli, and David R Kelley, 2021, Effective gene expression prediction from sequence by integrating long-range interactions, Nature methods, 18, 1196, 10.1038/s41592-021-01252-x · DOI · Paper page
  20. Bernardo P de Almeida , Hugo Dalla-Torre , Guillaume Richard , Christopher Blum , Lorenz Hexemer , Maxence Gelard , Priyanka Pandey , Stefan Laurent , Alexandre Laterre , Maren Lang , et al. Segmentnt: annotating the genome at single-nucleotide resolution with dna foundation models. bioRxiv, pages 2024–03, 2024. · DOI
  21. 10.1098/rstb.2009.0305 · DOI
  22. J. Su , Y. Lu , S. Pan , A. Murtadha , B. Wen , and Y. Liu . Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.09864, 2021. · arXiv
  23. Ofir Press , Noah A Smith , and Mike Lewis . Train short, test long: Attention with linear biases enables input length extrapolation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.12409, 2021. · arXiv
  24. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba . Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014. · arXiv
  25. 2022, Few-shot parameter-efficient fine-tuning is better and cheaper than in-context learning, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 1950
  26. 10.1002/prot.25674 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/nar/gkac439 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/bib/bbw129 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990301)34:4<508::AID-PROT10>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
  30. 2018, Assessment of hard target modeling in casp12 reveals an emerging role of alignment-based contact prediction methods, Proteins, 86, 97, 10.1002/prot.25423 · DOI
  31. Margaux M Pinney , Daniel A Mokhtari , Eyal Akiva , Filip Yabukarski , David M Sanchez , Ruibin Liang , Tzanko Doukov , Todd J Martinez , Patricia C Babbitt , and Daniel Herschlag . Parallel molecular mechanisms for enzyme temperature adaptation. Science, 371(6533), 2021. · DOI
  32. 10.1038/s41592-020-0801-4 · DOI
  33. 10.1101/2021.11.09.467890 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/molbev/msu081 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/nature17995 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1126/science.aan0693 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Carola Kanz , Philippe Aldebert , Nicola Althorpe , Wendy Baker , Alastair Baldwin , Kirsty Bates , Paul Browne , Alexandra van den Broek, Matias Castro, Guy Cochrane, et al. The embl nucleotide sequence database. Nucleic acids research, 33(suppl_1):D29–D33, 2005. · DOI
  38. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Harald Steck , Chaitanya Ekanadham , and Nathan Kallus . Is cosine-similarity of embeddings really about similarity? ACM Web Conference 2024 (WWW 2024 Companion), 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2403.05440. arXiv:2403.05440 [cs.IR] (or arXiv:2403.05440v1 [cs.IR] for this version). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Boshar, S., Trop, E., de Almeida, B. P., Copoiu, L., & Pierrot, T.
Corresponding author
Pierrot, Thomas
Venue
Bioinformatics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-05-22
Volume
40
Issue
9
ISSN
1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402100089
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
Keywords
genomic language models, protein prediction, coding sequences, Nucleotide Transformer, sequence embeddings, central dogma
MeSH terms
Humans, Proteins, Genomics, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review