PreprintCited by 44Evolution and Genetic DynamicsEnzyme Catalysis and ImmobilizationProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A combinatorially complete epistatic fitness landscape in an enzyme active site

Open access
Johnston, Kadina E., Almhjell, Patrick J., Watkins-Dulaney, Ella J., Liu, Grace, Porter, Nicholas J., Yang, Jason, Arnold, Frances H.·2024·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Preprint — published as 10.1073/pnas.2400439121 · Paper page

Abstract

Protein engineering often targets binding pockets or active sites which are enriched in epistasis— non-additive interactions between amino acid substitutions—and where the combined effects of multiple single substitutions are difficult to predict. Few existing sequence-fitness datasets capture epistasis at large scale, especially for enzyme catalysis, limiting the development and assessment of model-guided enzyme engineering approaches. We present here a combinatorially complete, 160,000-variant fitness landscape across four residues in the active site of an enzyme. Assaying the native reaction of a thermostable β-subunit of tryptophan synthase (TrpB) in a non-native environment yielded a landscape characterized by significant epistasis and many local optima. These effects prevent simulated directed evolution approaches from efficiently reaching the global optimum. There is nonetheless wide variability in the effectiveness of different directed evolution approaches, which together provide experimental benchmarks for computational and machine learning workflows. The most-fit TrpB variants contain a substitution that is nearly absent in natural TrpB sequences—a result that conservation-based predictions would not capture. Thus, although fitness prediction using evolutionary data can enrich in more-active variants, these approaches struggle to identify and differentiate among the most-active variants, even for this near-native function. Overall, this work presents a new, large-scale testing ground for model-guided enzyme engineering and suggests that efficient navigation of epistatic fitness landscapes can be improved by advances in both machine learning and physical modeling. Significance statement: Predictive models for protein engineering seek to capture the relationship between protein sequence and function. While many methods and datasets exist for predicting the effects of single substitutions across a range of protein functions, fewer capture interactions among substitutions, which are much more difficult to predict. Even fewer do this comprehensively for a catalytic function. To provide a testbed for evaluating predictive models for enzyme engineering, we constructed and analyzed a 160,000-member enzyme sequence-fitness dataset at four interacting residues near the active site of tryptophan synthase, capturing significant non-additive effects of substitutions on catalytic function. It is necessary to predict and understand such interactions in order to efficiently traverse evolutionary landscapes and build machine learning models that accelerate protein engineering.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.06.23.600144

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1038/nrg3927 · DOI
  2. 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.7b00114 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nmeth.3027 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1002/pro.2897 · DOI
  5. 10.1101/2023.09.02.556057 · DOI
  6. 2022, Learning protein fitness models from evolutionary and assay-labeled data, Nat Biotechnol, 40, 1114, 10.1038/s41587-021-01146-5 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.sbi.2021.04.007 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/S41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/s41592-019-0496-6 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.sbi.2021.01.008 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.1901979116 · DOI
  14. 2021, Informed training set design enables efficient machine learning-assisted directed protein evolution, Cell Syst, 12, 1026, 10.1016/j.cels.2021.07.008 · DOI
  15. 2021, Cluster learning-assisted directed evolution, Nat Comput Sci, 1, 809, 10.1038/s43588-021-00168-y · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nature17995 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 2019, An experimental assay of the interactions of amino acids from orthologous sequences shaping a complex fitness landscape, PLOS Genetics, 15, e1008079, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008079 · DOI
  18. 10.7554/eLife.75842 · DOI
  19. 10.1101/2021.11.09.467890 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.072 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.adh3860 · DOI
  22. 2024, Network of epistatic interactions in an enzyme active site revealed by large-scale deep mutational scanning, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 121, e2313513121, 10.1073/pnas.2313513121 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.gde.2013.10.007 · DOI
  24. 10.1126/science.1257360 · DOI
  25. 10.7554/eLife.16965 · DOI
  26. 2022, Design of protein-binding proteins from the target structure alone, Nature, 605, 551, 10.1038/s41586-022-04654-9 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1002/anie.201204077 · DOI
  28. G. Rix , et al., Scalable continuous evolution for the generation of diverse enzyme variants encompassing promiscuous activities. Nat Commun 11 (2020). · DOI
  29. 10.1038/nmeth.1492 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1073/pnas.1516401112 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/anie.201606242 · DOI
  32. 2018, Improved Synthesis of 4-Cyanotryptophan and Other Tryptophan Analogues in Aqueous Solvent Using Variants of TrpB from Thermotoga maritima, J Org Chem, 83, 7447, 10.1021/acs.joc.8b00517 · DOI
  33. 2022, evSeq: Cost-Effective Amplicon Sequencing of Every Variant in a Protein Library, ACS Synth Biol, 11, 1313, 10.1021/acssynbio.1c00592 · DOI
  34. 10.1371/journal.pone.0118193 · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.1804015115 · DOI
  36. 10.1126/science.abn6895 · DOI
  37. 2002, Why are proteins marginally stable?, Proteins: Struct, Funct, Bioinf, 46, 105, 10.1002/prot.10016 · DOI
  38. 10.1073/pnas.1903888116 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/nbt.3769 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 2021, The adaptive landscape of a metallo-enzyme is shaped by environment-dependent epistasis, Nat Commun, 12, 3867, 10.1038/s41467-021-23943-x · DOI
  42. 2021, Fundamentals to function: Quantitative and scalable approaches for measuring protein stability, Cell Syst, 12, 547, 10.1016/j.cels.2021.05.009 · DOI
  43. 2023, Mega-scale experimental analysis of protein folding stability in biology and design, Nature, 620, 434, 10.1038/s41586-023-06328-6 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1126/science.abf8761 · DOI
  45. 10.1073/pnas.0510098103 · DOI
  46. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000002 · DOI
  47. 10.1101/2023.06.29.547057 · DOI
  48. T. Baba , et al., Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol 2 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1073/pnas.120163297 · DOI
  50. 10.1261/rna.038588.113 · DOI
  51. 10.1021/sb300037w · DOI
  52. 10.1126/science.1203801 · DOI
  53. A. Hagberg A ., D. A. Schult , P. J. Swart , Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function using NetworkX in Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy 2008), (Gäel Varoquaux, Travis Vaught, and Jarrod Millman, 2008), pp. 11–15. · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1021/bi400795e · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Johnston, K. E., Almhjell, P. J., Watkins-Dulaney, E. J., Liu, G., Porter, N. J., Yang, J., & Arnold, F. H.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Almhjell, Patrick J.
  • Arnold, Frances H.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-06-26
Volume
121
Issue
32
Pages
e2400439121-e2400439121
ISSN
0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401071498
Cited by
44
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 5
FWCI
11.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0022218)
  • Amgen
  • Helen Hay Whitney Foundation
  • California Institute of Technology
  • Office of Science
  • Basic Energy Sciences (DE-SC0022218)
  • National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
epistasis, fitness landscape, enzyme active site, tryptophan synthase, trpB, directed evolution, non-additive interactions, local optima, fitness prediction, thermostable enzymes
MeSH terms
Epistasis, Genetic, Models, Molecular, Tryptophan Synthase, Protein Engineering, Amino Acid Substitution, Catalytic Domain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review