PreprintCited by 8Computational Drug Discovery MethodsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

DeepDrug: An Expert-led Domain-specific AI-Driven Drug-Repurposing Mechanism for Selecting the Lead Combination of Drugs for Alzheimer’s Disease

Open access
Li, Victor OK, Han, Yang, Kaistha, Tushar, Zhang, Qi, Downey, Jocelyn, Gozes, Illana, Lam, Jacqueline CK·2024·medRxiv

Abstract

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) significantly aggravates human dignity and quality of life. While newly approved amyloid immunotherapy has been reported, effective AD drugs remain to be identified. Here, we propose a novel AI-driven drug-repurposing method, DeepDrug, to identify a lead combination of approved drugs to treat AD patients. DeepDrug advances drug-repurposing methodology in four aspects. Firstly, it incorporates expert knowledge to extend candidate targets to include long genes, immunological and aging pathways, and somatic mutation markers that are associated with AD. Secondly, it incorporates a signed directed heterogeneous biomedical graph encompassing a rich set of nodes and edges, and node/edge weighting to capture crucial pathways associated with AD. Thirdly, it encodes the weighted biomedical graph through a Graph Neural Network into a new embedding space to capture the granular relationships across different nodes. Fourthly, it systematically selects the high-order drug combinations via diminishing return-based thresholds. A five-drug lead combination, consisting of Tofacitinib, Niraparib, Baricitinib, Empagliflozin, and Doxercalciferol, has been selected from the top drug candidates based on DeepDrug scores to achieve the maximum synergistic effect. These five drugs target neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and glucose metabolism, which are all related to AD pathology. DeepDrug offers a novel AI-and-big-data, expert-guided mechanism for new drug combination discovery and drug-repurposing across AD and other neuro-degenerative diseases, with immediate clinical applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.07.06.24309990

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, V. O., Han, Y., Kaistha, T., Zhang, Q., Downey, J., Gozes, I., & Lam, J. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Victor OK
  • Lam, Jacqueline CK
Venue
medRxiv
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-07-07
OpenAlex
W4400399143
Cited by
8
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Biogen
  • University of Hong Kong
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, drug repurposing, expert knowledge integration, graph neural networks, diminishing returns, synergistic drug combination, neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, glucose metabolism, tofacitinib, niraparib, baricitinib, empagliflozin, doxercalciferol, neurodegenerative diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review