PreprintCited by 9Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep learning guided design of dynamic proteins

Open access
Guo, Amy B., Akpinaroglu, Deniz, Kelly, Mark J.S., Kortemme, Tanja·2024·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.1126/science.adr7094 · Paper page

Abstract

Deep learning has greatly advanced design of highly stable static protein structures, but the controlled conformational dynamics that are hallmarks of natural switch-like signaling proteins have remained inaccessible to de novo design. Here, we describe a general deep-learning-guided approach for de novo design of dynamic changes between intra-domain geometries of proteins, similar to switch mechanisms prevalent in nature, with atom-level precision. We solve 4 structures validating the designed conformations, show microsecond transitions between them, and demonstrate that the conformational landscape can be modulated by orthosteric ligands and allosteric mutations. Physics-based simulations are in remarkable agreement with deep-learning predictions and experimental data, reveal distinct state-dependent residue interaction networks, and predict mutations that tune the designed conformational landscape. Our approach demonstrates that new modes of motion can now be realized through de novo design and provides a framework for constructing biology-inspired, tunable and controllable protein signaling behavior de novo .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.07.17.603962

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 2009, The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition, Nature Chemical Biology, 5, 789, 10.1038/nchembio.232 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nature06522 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2020, Computational design of G Protein-Coupled Receptor allosteric signal transductions, Nature Chemical Biology, 16, 77, 10.1038/s41589-019-0407-2 · DOI
  4. 2023, Computational remodeling of an enzyme conformational landscape for altered substrate selectivity, Nature Communications, 14, 6058, 10.1038/s41467-023-41762-0 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00741-9 · DOI
  6. 2021, GPCR activation mechanisms across classes and macro/microscales, Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, 28, 879, 10.1038/s41594-021-00674-7 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.cell.2023.12.028 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/pro.2128 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.016 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.sbi.2021.08.004 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/ja054718w · DOI · Paper page
  12. 2023, Design and characterization of a protein fold switching network, Nature Communications, 14, 431, 10.1038/s41467-023-36065-3 · DOI
  13. 2017, Rational design of proteins that exchange on functional timescales, Nature Chemical Biology, 13, 1280, 10.1038/nchembio.2503 · DOI
  14. 2024, A de novo designed coiled coil-based switch regulates the microtubule motor kinesin-1, Nature Chemical Biology, 20, 916, 10.1038/s41589-024-01640-2 · DOI
  15. 10.1126/science.adg7731 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/s41586-019-1432-8 · DOI
  17. 10.1126/science.add2187 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1101/2023.12.15.571823 · DOI
  19. 10.1126/science.abc0881 · DOI
  20. 10.1021/bi963076+ · DOI
  21. 10.1126/sci-ence.adl2528 · DOI
  22. 2009, Quantifying correlations between allosteric sites in thermodynamic ensembles, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 5, 2486, 10.1021/ct9001812 · DOI
  23. 10.1126/science.aaw1147 · DOI
  24. 2024, Protein Ensemble Generation Through Variational Autoencoder Latent Space Sampling, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 20, 2689, 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01057 · DOI
  25. 2023, Machine learned coarse-grained protein force-fields: Are we there yet?, Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 79, 102533, 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102533 · DOI
  26. 2023, Machine learning coarse-grained potentials of protein thermodynamics, Nature Communications, 14, 5739, 10.1038/s41467-023-41343-1 · DOI
  27. 2023, Direct generation of protein conformational ensembles via machine learning, Nature Communications, 14, 774, 10.1038/s41467-023-36443-x · DOI · Paper page
  28. 2024, Predicting equilibrium distributions for molecular systems with deep learning, Nature Machine Intelligence, 6, 558, 10.1038/s42256-024-00837-3 · DOI
  29. 2020, RosettaScripts: A scripting language interface to the Rosetta macromolecular modeling suite, PLoS One, 6, e20161
  30. 10.1371/journal.pone.0023294 · DOI
  31. 2017, The Rosetta All-Atom Energy Function for Macromolecular Modeling and Design, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 13, 3031, 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00125 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 2007, High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method, Nature Protocols, 2, 31, 10.1038/nprot.2007.13 · DOI
  33. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3130 · DOI
  34. 2022, Rapid protein assignments and structures from raw NMR spectra with the deep learning technique ARTINA, Nature Communications, 13, 6151, 10.1038/s41467-022-33879-5 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s10858-009-9333-z · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s10858-016-0060-y · DOI
  37. 2018, Xplor-NIH for molecular structure determination from NMR and other data sources, Protein Sci, 27, 26, 10.1002/pro.3248 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/nar/gkl971 · DOI
  39. 10.1146/annurev.bi.58.070189.004511 · DOI
  40. 2015, Design of Protein Multi-specificity Using an Independent Sequence Search Reduces the Barrier to Low Energy Sequences, PLoS Computational Biology, 11, e1004300, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004300 · DOI
  41. 2017, Rosetta:MSF: a modular framework for multi-state computational protein design, PLoS Computational Biology, 13, e1005600, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005600 · DOI
  42. 2022, ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all, Nature Methods, 19, 679, 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1002/jcc.20291 · DOI
  44. 2018, Developing a molecular dynamics force field for both folded and disordered protein states, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, E4748
  45. 10.1101/2021.07.09.450648 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Guo, A. B., Akpinaroglu, D., Kelly, M. J. S., & Kortemme, T.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
  • Guo, Amy B.
  • Kortemme, Tanja
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-07-19
OpenAlex
W4400892779
Cited by
9
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (g-2021-16899)
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od023455-01a1)
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM145236)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
de novo protein design, protein conformational dynamics, orthosteric ligands, residue interaction networks, conformational landscape, protein signaling, deep learning protein design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review