PreprintCited by 3CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural basis for sequence context-independent single-stranded DNA cytosine deamination by the bacterial toxin SsdA

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-025-63943-9 · Paper page

Abstract

DNA deaminase toxins are involved in interbacterial antagonism and the generation of genetic diversity in surviving bacterial populations. These enzymes have also been adopted as genome engineering tools. The single-stranded (ss)DNA deaminase SsdA represents the bacterial deaminase toxin family-2 (BaDTF2) and it deaminates ssDNA cytosines with little sequence context dependence, which contrasts with the AID/APOBEC family of sequence-selective ssDNA cytosine deaminases. Here we report the crystal structure of SsdA in complex with a ssDNA substrate. The structure reveals a unique mode of substrate binding, in which a cluster of aromatic residues of SsdA engages ssDNA in a V-shaped conformation sharply bent across the target cytosine. The bases 5’ or 3’ to the target cytosine are stacked linearly and make few sequence-specific protein contacts, thus explaining the broad substrate selectivity of SsdA. Unexpectedly, SsdA contains a β-amino acid isoaspartate, which is important for enzymatic activity and may contribute to the stability of SsdA as a toxin. Structure- function studies helped to design SsdA mutants active in human cells, which could lead to future applications in genome engineering.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.09.08.611884

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1111/mmi.14648 · DOI
  2. de Moraes, M.H. et al. An interbacterial DNA deaminase toxin directly mutagenizes surviving target populations. Elife 10(2021). · DOI
  3. 10.1038/s41586-020-2477-4 · DOI
  4. 2023, A DddA ortholog-based and transactivator-assisted nuclear and mitochondrial cytosine base editors with expanded target compatibility, Mol Cell, 83, 1710, 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.04.012 · DOI
  5. 2023, Discovery of deaminase functions by structure-based protein clustering, Cell, 186, 3182, 10.1016/j.cell.2023.05.041 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/s41587-022-01486-w · DOI
  7. 2023, Structural basis of sequence-specific cytosine deamination by double-stranded DNA deaminase toxin DddA, Nat Struct Mol Biol, 30, 1153, 10.1038/s41594-023-01034-3 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/nar/gkr691 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/s41929-021-00633-x · DOI
  10. 2024, Discovery of cytosine deaminases enables base-resolution methylome mapping using a single enzyme, Mol Cell, 84, 854, 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.01.027 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.virol.2015.03.012 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102905 · DOI
  13. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002071 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41576-018-0059-1 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 2018, Perspective: APOBEC mutagenesis in drug resistance and immune escape in HIV and cancer evolution, Ann Oncol, 29, 563, 10.1093/annonc/mdy003 · DOI
  16. 1989, Deamidation via cyclic imide in asparaginyl peptides, Pept Res, 2, 195
  17. 10.1016/S0731-7085(99)00230-7 · DOI
  18. Kato, K. , Nakayoshi, T. , Kurimoto, E. & Oda, A . Mechanisms of Deamidation of Asparagine Residues and Effects of Main-Chain Conformation on Activation Energy. Int J Mol Sci 21(2020). · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1399-3011.2004.00151.x · DOI
  20. Xu, K. et al. Structure-guided discovery of highly efficient cytidine deaminases with sequence- context independence. Nat Biomed Eng (2024). · DOI
  21. 2023, APOBEC Reporter Systems for Evaluating diNucleotide Editing Levels, CRISPR J, 6, 430, 10.1089/crispr.2023.0027 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/nar/gky332 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/nbt.4172 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kweon, J. et al. Efficient DNA base editing via an optimized DYW-like deaminase. bioRxiv, 2024.05.15.594452 (2024). · DOI
  25. 10.1038/nsmb.3344 · DOI
  26. 10.1248/bpb.28.1590 · DOI
  27. 10.1074/jbc.M200229200 · DOI
  28. 10.1074/jbc.M604812200 · DOI
  29. 10.1128/JB.181.9.2872-2877.1999 · DOI
  30. 2019, A post-translational modification of human Norovirus capsid protein attenuates glycan binding, Nat Commun, 10, 1320, 10.1038/s41467-019-09251-5 · DOI
  31. 2020, An Unusually Rapid Protein Backbone Modification Stabilizes the Essential Bacterial Enzyme MurA, Biochemistry, 59, 3683, 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00502 · DOI
  32. 10.1107/S0907444909047337 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1107/S0907444910045749 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1107/S090744491003982X · DOI
  35. 10.1107/S0907444913000061 · DOI
  36. 1978, On the treatment of negative intensity observations. Acta Crystallographica Section A: Crystal Physics, Diffraction, Theoretical and General Crystallography, 34, 517
  37. 10.1107/S0021889807021206 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1107/S0907444909052925 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1038/nmeth.2089 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Shi, K. et al. Structural basis for recognition of distinct deaminated DNA lesions by endonuclease Q. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118(2021). · DOI
  42. 2024, The EMBL-EBI Job Dispatcher sequence analysis tools framework in 2024, Nucleic Acids Res, 52, W521, 10.1093/nar/gkae241 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Yin, L., Shi, K., Chen, Y., Harris, R. S., & Aihara, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Aihara, Hideki
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-09-08
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
8841-8841
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414793805
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (R35-GM118047, P01-CA234228)
  • Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT RR220053, RR220053)
  • National Institutes of Health (GM124165, NIGMS P30 GM124165)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA234228, P01CA234228)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM118047, GM124165, NIGMS R35-GM118047, P30GM133893, R35GM118047, P30GM124165)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
crystal structure, substrate binding, π-π stacking, genome editing, base editing, APOBEC, AID

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review