PreprintCited by 0Protein Structure and DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsChemical Synthesis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Assessing the helical stability of polyXYs at the boundaries of Intrinsically Disordered Regions with MD simulations

Open access
Gonçalves-Kulik, Mariane, Baptista, Luis A., Schmid, Friederike, Andrade-Navarro, Miguel A.·2024·Computational and Structural Biotechnology Reports

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.csbr.2025.100054 · Paper page

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in proteins lack stable structure. By carrying many hydrophilic and charged residues, it prevents them from forming globular domains and contributes to their flexibility and accessibility. Naturally, regions with reduced amino acid composition (low complexity regions; LCRs) occur within IDRs. Disorder and low complexity in protein sequences are linked to various biological functions including phase separation, regulation, and molecular interactions, and mutations in these regions can contribute to several diseases including cancer. Understanding these biological properties requires examination of the structural properties of IDRs and the LCRs within, but their inherently dynamic nature requires specific approaches combining sequence analyses, structure predictions and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Here, we leverage our previous work where we identified that some types of LCRs combining two residues (polyXY) are frequent within IDRs and confer them with propensity to form helical conformation. We identify a significant accumulation of such polyXYs at the ends of IDRs following alpha-helices that start outside the IDR and may extend through the polyXY into the IDR, particularly from the N-terminal end of the IDR. MD simulations support the dynamic nature of such helical conformations. Our results suggest a mechanism by which evolutionary emergence of LCRs at IDR ends could provide proteins with flexible regions for fold-upon-binding.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.11.16.623902

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 55

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. 10.1021/cr400525m · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2012.12.008 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.sbi.2015.03.008 · DOI
  4. 10.1073/pnas.1304749110 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/bib/bbz007 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac610 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/s41570-020-0204-1 · DOI
  8. 10.1042/BST20160172 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.aaf4382 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nrm3920 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nrg.2017.115 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125924 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41467-023-41018-x · DOI
  14. 10.3390/ijms20174186 · DOI
  15. 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01175 · DOI
  16. 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00762 · DOI
  17. 10.1039/c9cp03434j · DOI
  18. 10.1038/s41592-021-01117-3 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1073/pnas.2304302120 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.3390/biom12081098 · DOI
  21. 10.3390/genes14091711 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/nar/gkac1065 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1093/nar/gku1028 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.1800690115 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/cbdd.13342 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/jp973084f · DOI
  28. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
  30. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-113009-092313 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/s41418-022-01000-4 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.10.028 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/ncb2407 · DOI
  34. 10.3390/genes13050758 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.09.011 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/pro.3718 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/anie.201307712 · DOI
  38. 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00179 · DOI
  39. 10.3390/biom10101413 · DOI
  40. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011565 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/prot.26441 · DOI
  42. 10.3390/biology12020182 · DOI
  43. 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01361 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.jsb.2019.107428 · DOI
  45. 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1143353 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/s41598-019-43926-9 · DOI
  47. 10.1042/BST20210499 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/380730a0 · DOI
  49. 10.1063/1.5109531 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.04.050 · DOI
  51. 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00591 · DOI
  52. 10.1073/pnas.2313360121 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Gonçalves-Kulik, M., Baptista, L. A., Schmid, F., & Andrade-Navarro, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Andrade-Navarro, Miguel A.
Venue
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Reports
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-11-18
Volume
2
ISSN
2950-3639 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410921172
Cited by
0
References
55
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Gutenberg Open Science (cc-by)
Funders
  • Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
intrinsically disordered regions, low complexity regions, helical propensity, alpha-helix formation, protein flexibility, protein evolution, phase separation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review