The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Assessing the helical stability of polyXYs at the boundaries of Intrinsically Disordered Regions with MD simulations
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.csbr.2025.100054 · Paper page
Abstract
Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in proteins lack stable structure. By carrying many hydrophilic and charged residues, it prevents them from forming globular domains and contributes to their flexibility and accessibility. Naturally, regions with reduced amino acid composition (low complexity regions; LCRs) occur within IDRs. Disorder and low complexity in protein sequences are linked to various biological functions including phase separation, regulation, and molecular interactions, and mutations in these regions can contribute to several diseases including cancer. Understanding these biological properties requires examination of the structural properties of IDRs and the LCRs within, but their inherently dynamic nature requires specific approaches combining sequence analyses, structure predictions and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Here, we leverage our previous work where we identified that some types of LCRs combining two residues (polyXY) are frequent within IDRs and confer them with propensity to form helical conformation. We identify a significant accumulation of such polyXYs at the ends of IDRs following alpha-helices that start outside the IDR and may extend through the polyXY into the IDR, particularly from the N-terminal end of the IDR. MD simulations support the dynamic nature of such helical conformations. Our results suggest a mechanism by which evolutionary emergence of LCRs at IDR ends could provide proteins with flexible regions for fold-upon-binding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 55
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- 10.1021/cr400525m · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbapap.2012.12.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2015.03.008 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1304749110 · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbz007 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac610 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41570-020-0204-1 · DOI
- 10.1042/BST20160172 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaf4382 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrm3920 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrg.2017.115 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125924 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-023-41018-x · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms20174186 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01175 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00762 · DOI
- 10.1039/c9cp03434j · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-021-01117-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.2304302120 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/biom12081098 · DOI
- 10.3390/genes14091711 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac1065 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gku1028 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1800690115 · DOI
- 10.1111/cbdd.13342 · DOI
- 10.1021/jp973084f · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-biochem-113009-092313 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41418-022-01000-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.10.028 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncb2407 · DOI
- 10.3390/genes13050758 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.09.011 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.3718 · DOI
- 10.1002/anie.201307712 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00179 · DOI
- 10.3390/biom10101413 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011565 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.26441 · DOI
- 10.3390/biology12020182 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01361 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsb.2019.107428 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1143353 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-019-43926-9 · DOI
- 10.1042/BST20210499 · DOI
- 10.1038/380730a0 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.5109531 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.04.050 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00591 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2313360121 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Gonçalves-Kulik, M., Baptista, L. A., Schmid, F., & Andrade-Navarro, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Andrade-Navarro, Miguel A.
- Venue
- Computational and Structural Biotechnology Reports
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-11-18
- Volume
- 2
- ISSN
- 2950-3639 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4410921172
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Computational and Structural Biotechnology Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Gutenberg Open Science (cc-by)
- Funders
- Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
- Keywords
- intrinsically disordered regions, low complexity regions, helical propensity, alpha-helix formation, protein flexibility, protein evolution, phase separation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review