Cited by 0Protein Structure and DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsChemical Synthesis and Analysis

Assessing the helical stability of polyXYs at the boundaries of intrinsically disordered regions with MD simulations

Open access
Gonçalves-Kulik, Mariane, Baptista, Luis A., Schmid, Friederike, Andrade-Navarro, Miguel A.·2025·Computational and Structural Biotechnology Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in proteins lack stable structure. By carrying many hydrophilic and charged residues, it prevents them from forming globular domains and contributes to their flexibility and accessibility. Naturally, regions with reduced amino acid composition (low complexity regions; LCRs) occur within IDRs. Disorder and low complexity in protein sequences are linked to various biological functions including phase separation, regulation, and molecular interactions, and mutations in these regions can contribute to several diseases including cancer. Understanding these biological properties requires examination of the structural properties of IDRs and the LCRs within, but their inherently dynamic nature requires specific approaches combining sequence analyses, structure predictions and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Here, we leverage our previous work where we identified that some types of LCRs combining two residues (polyXY) are frequent within IDRs and confer them with propensity to form helical conformation. We identify a significant accumulation of such polyXYs at the ends of IDRs following alpha-helices that start outside the IDR and may extend through the polyXY into the IDR, particularly from the N-terminal end of the IDR. MD simulations support the dynamic nature of such helical conformations. Our results suggest a mechanism by which evolutionary emergence of LCRs at IDR ends could provide proteins with flexible regions for fold-upon-binding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.csbr.2025.100054

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Gonçalves-Kulik, M., Baptista, L. A., Schmid, F., & Andrade-Navarro, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Andrade-Navarro, Miguel A.
Venue
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Reports
Published
2025-01
Volume
2
ISSN
2950-3639 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410921172
Cited by
0
References
55
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Gutenberg Open Science (cc-by)
Funders
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • Johannes Gutenberg University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
intrinsically disordered regions, low complexity regions, helical propensity, alpha-helix formation, protein flexibility, protein evolution, phase separation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review