PreprintCited by 3Cellular transport and secretionLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchCalcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Molecular Insights into the Regulation of GNPTAB by TMEM251

Open access
Yang, Xi, Doray, Balraj, Venkatarangan, Varsha, Jennings, Benjamin C., Henn, Danielle, Liang, Jiaxuan, Zhao, Haikun, Zhang, Weichao, Zhang, Bokai, Yu, Linchen, Chen, Liang, Kornfeld, Stuart, Li, Ming·2024·Nature Communications

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-026-70402-6 · Paper page

Abstract

In vertebrates, newly synthesized lysosomal enzymes traffick to lysosomes through the mannose-6-phosphate (M6P) pathway. The Golgi membrane protein TMEM251 was recently discovered to regulate lysosome biogenesis by controlling the level of GlcNAc-1-phosphotransferase (GNPT). However, its precise function remained unclear. In this study, we demonstrate that TMEM251 is a two-transmembrane protein indispensable for GNPT stability, cleavage by Site-1-Protease (S1P), and enzymatic activity. We reconcile conflicting models by showing that TMEM251 enhances GNPT cleavage and prevents its mislocalization to lysosomes for degradation. We further establish that TMEM251 achieves this by interacting with GOLPH3 and retromer complexes to anchor the TMEM251-GNPT complex at the Golgi. Alanine mutagenesis identified F 4 XXR 7 motif in TMEM251’s N-tail for GOLPH3 binding. Together, our findings uncover TMEM251’s multi-faceted role in stabilizing GNPT, retaining it at the Golgi, and ensuring the fidelity of the M6P pathway, thereby providing insights into its molecular function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.12.05.627003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 43 · Cited by 3

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1038/nrm1050 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/s41580-023-00676-x · DOI
  3. 10.3390/ijms21186812 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/15548627.2023.2167375 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41467-022-33025-1 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.abn5637 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.abn5648 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/humu.24139 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.tcb.2023.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1080/15548627.2023.2167376 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.1401417111 · DOI
  12. 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090954 · DOI
  13. 10.1074/jbc.M116.714568 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41594-022-00748-0 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/nrm934 · DOI
  16. 10.1074/jbc.273.4.1982 · DOI
  17. 10.1074/jbc.274.6.3363 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/nar/gkv485 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn221 · DOI
  20. 10.1073/pnas.1810291115 · DOI
  21. 10.1083/jcb.202106115 · DOI
  22. 10.1074/jbc.M112.346528 · DOI
  23. 10.1126/science.1159411 · DOI
  24. 10.15252/embj.2020107238 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/S0955-0674(96)80034-2 · DOI
  26. 10.1083/jcb.137.1.79 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1083/jcb.201901019 · DOI
  28. 10.1242/jcs.103440 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1083/jcb.200312055 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1073/pnas.2203518119 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101702 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/nprot.2013.143 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001361 · DOI
  34. 10.1074/jbc.M113.545699 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1074/jbc.270.27.16441 · DOI
  36. 10.1172/JCI169551 · DOI
  37. 10.1083/jcb.202012104 · DOI
  38. 10.1128/MCB.8.11.4936 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Yang, X., Doray, B., Venkatarangan, V., Jennings, B. C., Henn, D., Liang, J., Zhao, H., Zhang, W., Zhang, B., Yu, L., Chen, L., Kornfeld, S., & Li, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Denver (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Ming
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-12-05
Volume
17
Issue
1
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7134921154
Cited by
3
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA008759)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD109346)
  • Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute (R01CA008759)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism
Keywords
lysosomal enzyme trafficking, lysosomal biogenesis, GOLPH3, retromer complex, Golgi retention, protein stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review