PreprintCited by 21Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsEnzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Q-score as a reliability measure for protein, nucleic acid, and small molecule atomic coordinate models derived from 3DEM density maps

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1107/s2059798325005923 · Paper page

Abstract

Atomic coordinate models are important in the interpretation of 3D maps produced with cryoEM and sub-tomogram averaging in cryoET, or more generically, 3D electron microscopy (3DEM). In addition to visual inspection of such maps and models, quantitative metrics convey the reliability of the atomic coordinates, in particular how well the model is supported by the experimentally determined 3DEM map. A recently introduced metric, Q-score, was shown to correlate well with the reported resolution of the map for well-fitted models. Here we present new statistical analyses of Q-scores based on its application to ∼10,000 maps and models archived in EMDB and PDB. Further we introduce two new metrics based on Q-score: Q-relative-all and Q-relative-resolution to compare a map and model to all entries in the EMDB and those with similar resolution respectively. We also explore through illustrative examples of proteins, nucleic acids, and small molecules how Q-scores can indicate whether the atomic coordinates are well-fitted to 3DEM maps and whether some parts of a map may be poorly resolved due to factors such as molecular flexibility, radiation damage, and/or conformational heterogeneity. Lastly, we show examples of how Q-scores can effectively be converted to atomic B-factors. These analyses provide a basis for how Q-scores can be interpreted effectively to evaluate 3DEM maps and atomic coordinate models prior to publication and archiving. Synopsis: Q-scores are calculated each atom in models fitted to 3DEM (3D electron microscopy) maps. They measure how well the model fits the map, and also reflect the quality of the map as they correlate to resolution. Here we develop a statistical model for Q-scores applied to many maps and models in the EMDB (Electron Microscopy Database) and PDB (Protein Data Bank) respectively, and show how it can be used to assess the reliability of entire models as well as their subcomponents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.01.14.633006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1107/S2059798318009324 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/nmeth.3541 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.str.2018.04.004 · DOI
  4. 2024, Nat. Commun., 15, 444
  5. 10.1007/s12551-022-01013-w · DOI
  6. 10.1002/pro.3865 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.str.2021.02.004 · DOI
  8. Frank, J. (2017). Single-particle Cryo-electron Microscopy: The Path Toward Atomic Resolution: Selected Papers of Joachim Frank with Commentaries World Scientific Publishing Company. · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.str.2017.10.009 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.str.2011.12.014 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/s41586-024-07215-4 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.jsb.2017.05.007 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41467-021-21509-5 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41594-021-00619-0 · DOI
  15. 10.1107/S2059798319013391 · DOI
  16. 10.1107/S2052252524001246 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/s41592-020-01051-w · DOI
  18. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3864137/v1 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/bip.22074 · DOI
  21. 10.1107/S2059798321006069 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41592-020-0731-1 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/s41467-020-20295-w · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.07.013 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1038/s41586-021-03803-w · DOI
  26. 10.1107/S2059798318004655 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.01.012 · DOI
  28. 2020, J Struct Biol X, 4, 100016
  29. 10.1002/pro.3330 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1107/S0907444900014736 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/nar/gkad1019 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.str.2017.01.004 · DOI
  33. 10.1101/2020.08.11.245696 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/s41422-020-00432-2 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Pintilie, G., Shao, C., Wang, Z., Hudson, B. P., Flatt, J. W., Schmid, M. F., Morris, K., Burley, S. K., & Chiu, W.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Chiu, Wah
Venue
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-01-15
Volume
81
Issue
8
Pages
410-422
ISSN
2059-7983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412388667
Cited by
21
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 5
FWCI
7.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (212977/Z/18/Z)
  • National Institutes of Health (1r24gm154186-01)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences (DBI-2321666)
  • Office of Science (DESC0019749)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R24 GM154186, P41GM103311, R01GM129325, R01GM157729)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
Q-score, model reliability, map resolution, EMDB, conformational heterogeneity, radiation damage, molecular flexibility, nucleic acid models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review