PreprintCited by 16Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Researchvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesProtein purification and stability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A high-throughput platform for biophysical antibody developability assessment to enable AI/ML model training

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1080/19420862.2025.2593055 · Paper page

Abstract

Antibodies must bind their targets with high affinity and specificity to achieve useful therapeutic activity. They must also possess suitable developability properties (e.g., thermostability, solubility, viscosity, polyreactivity) to ensure favorable manufacturing, formulation, and in vivo performance. Both binding and developability properties are inherent to a given antibody amino acid sequence. Identification or selection of antibodies possessing suitable binding characteristics is now routine, and de novo computational design models, trained on extensive complementarity-determining region sequence and structural data, are rapidly improving. Developability properties, however, remain difficult to predict largely due to insufficient training data, with empirical testing being heavily used to avoid challenges in late-stage antibody development. To fill this gap, we built a high-throughput antibody developability assay platform designed to generate the large datasets needed to train improved machine learning (ML) models. We optimized and automated known developability assays [Jain et al., 2017], and developed a robust integrated data analytics pipeline. Here we report data on 246 antibodies—representing 106 approved, 135 clinical-stage, and 5 preregistration/withdrawn molecules—across a panel of 10 developability assays, in a “tidy data” format suitable for AI/ML modeling. We used these data to develop an XGBoost [Chen et al., 2016] ML model that better predicts similarity to approved antibodies compared to conventional use of developability warning thresholds. Additionally, we confirm that preliminary predictive models do improve with more training data. Our high-throughput PROPHET-Ab platform enables data generation at the scale needed to develop improved ML models to predict antibody developability. Significance: Successful antibody drugs exhibit important “developability” properties, beyond tight and specific binding to their target, including high expressibility, high stability and solubility, low aggregation propensity, low viscosity, low polyreactivity, and long in vivo half-life. Collectively, developability properties predict favorable manufacturing, storage, administration, and safety, and deficiencies in these properties increase risk for clinical failure. Despite progress in developing machine learning models to predict structure and binding, antibody developability models lag, largely due to a lack of sufficiently large training datasets. We have built a high-throughput platform, PROPHET-Ab, that enables data generation at the scale needed to train improved AI/ML models to predict antibody developability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.05.01.651684

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1073/pnas.2020577118 · DOI
  2. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01986 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1101/2025.01.21.633066 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/nar/gky1004 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/s41573-024-01051-x · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00190.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114801 · DOI
  9. 10.1145/2939672.2939785 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.04.047 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/s41586-024-07385-1 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/19420862.2024.2361928 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv552 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41587-024-02469-9 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s12551-020-00619-2 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/s41587-021-01146-5 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/jps.21104 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/19420862.2024.2384104 · DOI
  19. 10.1073/pnas.1616408114 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1080/19420862.2023.2200540 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.1129594 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012646 · DOI
  23. 10.3390/ph15010029 · DOI
  24. 10.1126/sciadv.abb0372 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/19420862.2015.1048410 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/19420862.2019.1683432 · DOI
  27. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1266668 · DOI
  28. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.4161/mabs.27431 · DOI
  30. 10.1186/s12929-019-0592-z · DOI
  31. 10.1111/febs.14696 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/19420862.2021.1951426 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.ymben.2022.03.009 · DOI
  34. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028766 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.3390/antib10010008 · DOI
  36. 10.1073/pnas.1111471108 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Notin, Pascal ; Kollasch, Aaron ; Ritter, Daniel ; van Niekerk, Lood ; Paul, Steffanie ; Spinner, Han ; Rollins, Nathan ; Shaw, Ada ; Orenbuch, Rose ; Weitzman, Ruben ; Frazer, Jonathan ; Dias, Mafalda ; Franceschi, Dinko ; Gal, Yarin ; Marks, Debora . “ProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and Design.” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (NeurIPS 2023) — Datasets & Benchmarks Track, 2023, https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2023/hash/cac723e5ff29f65e3fcbb0739ae91bee-Abstract-Datasets_and_Benchmarks.html
  38. 10.1002/pro.4205 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae618 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.it.2021.10.008 · DOI
  41. 10.1101/2024.08.03.606485 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.08.020 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.056 · DOI
  45. 10.1074/jbc.M202069200 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1126/science.adc9498 · DOI
  47. 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1469329 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.08.036 · DOI
  49. 10.1080/19420862.2024.2324836 · DOI
  50. 10.1080/19420862.2021.1993768 · DOI
  51. 10.1126/science.1144603 · DOI
  52. 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00520 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.07.018 · DOI
  54. 10.1007/s13238-017-0473-8 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.18637/jss.v059.i10 · DOI
  56. 10.1080/19420862.2023.2211185 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Arsiwala, A., Bhatt, R., van Niekerk, L., Quintero-Cadena, P., Ao, X., Rosenbaum, A., Bhatt, A., Smith, A., Yang, Y., Anderson, K., Grippo, L., Cao, X., Cohen, R., Patel, J., Moller, J., Allen, O., Faraj, A., Nandy, A., Hocking, J., Ergun, A., Tural, B., Salvador, S., Jacobowitz, J., Schaven, K., Sherman, M., Shah, S., Tessier, P. M., & Borhani, D. W.
Affiliations
  • Ginkgo Bioworks, Inc. (United States) (US)
  • Currently at Cypher Technologies Inc., USA
  • Ginkgo Bioworks, Inc, MA, USA
  • AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
  • Currently at Takeda Pharmaceuticals, MA, USA
  • Currently at Merida Biosciences, MA, USA
  • Revolution Medicines (United States) (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
  • Arsiwala, Ammar
  • Borhani, David W.
Venue
mAbs
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-05-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
2593055-2593055
ISSN
1942-0862 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416903466
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 1
FWCI
9.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • mAbs (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
Keywords
antibody developability, therapeutic antibodies, XGBoost, thermal stability, solubility, viscosity, polyreactivity, antibody engineering, training data generation
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humans, High-Throughput Screening Assays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review