The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AF3Score: A Score-Only Adaptation of AlphaFold3 for Biomolecular Structure Evaluation
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00653 · Paper page
Abstract
Scoring biomolecular complexes remains central to structural modeling efforts. Recent studies suggest that AlphaFold (AF) – a revolutionary deep learning model for biomolecular structure prediction - has implicitly learned an approximate biophysical energy function. While many researchers highly rely on AF-derived scores for structure evaluation, existing AlphaFold2-based implementations require iterative refinement of the input structure, leading to biased scoring. To address this limitation, we adapted AlphaFold3 into a score-only model, AF3Score, by directly feeding input coordinates into the confidence head while bypassing the diffusion-based structure module. AF3Score demonstrates robust performance in structural quality assessment across diverse systems including monomeric proteins, protein-protein complexes, de novo designed binders, and fold-switching proteins. In benchmarking designed binder screening, AF3Score outperformed state-of-the-art methods for 8 out of 10 targets. Moreover, combining AF3Score with AlphaFold2-derived methods significantly improved the enrichment of experimentally validated binders, increasing the success rate from 15.2% to 31.6%. Additionally, AF3Score effectively identified stable conformations in fold-switching proteins, whereas AlphaFold predominantly predicted only the dominant fold. These findings highlight the broad applicability of AF3Score, from high-throughput screening in de novo binder design to filtering docking-generated poses and molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Predicting multiple conformations via sequence clustering and AlphaFold2
Wayment-Steele, H. K., Ojoawo, A., Otten, R., Apitz, J. M., Pitsawong, W., Hömberger, M., Ovchinnikov, S., Colwell, L., & Kern, D. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06832-9 · Cited by 545
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 2023, De Novo Design of Protein Structure and Function with RFdiffusion, Nature, 620, 1100
- Pacesa, M. et al. BindCraft: One-Shot Design of Functional Protein Binders. 2024. · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abi7801 · DOI
- 2024, Accurate Structure Prediction of Biomolecular Interactions with AlphaFold 3, Nature, 630, 500
- 2014, Learning To Fold Proteins Using Energy Landscape Theory, Israel Journal of Chemistry, 54, 1337
- 2015, Energy Landscapes and the Paradoxes of Protein Folding, Biochimie, 119, 230
- 10.1038/s41467-020-19560-9 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.238101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-023-38328-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 2016, Simultaneous Optimization of Biomolecular Energy Functions on Features from Small Molecules and Macromolecules, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 12, 6212
- 2017, The Rosetta All-Atom Energy Function for Macromolecular Modeling and Design, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 13, 3048
- 10.1038/s41467-021-21511-x · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, The HDOCK Server for Integrated Protein– Protein Docking, Nature Protocols, 15, 1852
- 2024, The HADDOCK2.4 Web Server for Integrative Modeling of Biomolecular Complexes, Nature Protocols, 19, 3241
- 2013, Sampling and Scoring: A Marriage Made in Heaven: Sampling and Scoring, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 81, 1884
- 2020, Energy-based Graph Convolutional Networks for Scoring Protein Docking Models, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 88, 1099
- 2015, Updates to the Integrated Protein–Protein Interaction Benchmarks: Docking Benchmark Version 5 and Affinity Benchmark Version 2, Journal of Molecular Biology, 427, 3041
- 2024, Accurate Prediction of Protein–Nucleic Acid Complexes Using RoseTTAFoldNA, Nature Methods, 21, 121
- Watson, J. L. et al. Broadly Applicable and Accurate Protein Design by Integrating Structure Prediction Networks and Diffusion Generative Models. 2022. · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, Extant Fold-Switching Proteins Are Widespread, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 5973
- 10.1038/s41467-023-41237-2 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-024-51801-z · DOI · Paper page
- Evans, R. et al. Protein Complex Prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. 2021. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010483 · DOI · Paper page
- Kalakoti, Y. ; Wallner, B. AFsample2: Predicting Multiple Conformations and Ensem-bles with AlphaFold2. 2024. · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2410662121 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Yu, Q., Wang, D., & Chen, M.
- Affiliations
- Changping Laboratory (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Mingchen
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-05-15
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 8207-8214
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4412489171
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Changping Laboratory
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- AlphaFold3, structural quality assessment, protein-protein complex, protein-ligand complex, protein stability
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Ligands, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Folding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review