CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsProtein Structure and DynamicsCellular Mechanics and Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the Curvature and Relaxation of Microtubule Plus-end Tips

Open access
Skóra, Tomasz, Wu, Jiangbo, Beckett, Daniel, Xue, Weizhi, Voth, Gregory A., Bidone, Tamara C.·2025·Biophysical Journal
DOI 10.1101/2025.05.23.655844PMC PMC12154965

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.bpj.2025.07.003 · Paper page

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Microtubules are essential cytoskeletal components with a broad range of functions in which the structure and dynamics of their plus-end tips play critical roles. Existing mechanistic models explain the tips curving dynamics in different ways: the allosteric model suggests that GTP hydrolysis induces conformational changes in tubulin subunits that destabilize the lattice, leading to protofilament curving and depolymerization, while the lattice model posits that GTP hydrolysis directly destabilizes the microtubule lattice. However, the effect of GTP hydrolysis on the curving dynamics of microtubule tips remains incompletely understood. In this study, we employed a multiscale modeling approach, combining all-atom molecular dynamics simulations with Brownian dynamics simulations, to investigate the relaxation of microtubule plus-end tips into curved configurations. Our results show that both GDP- and GTP-bound tips exhibit an outward bending of protofilaments into curved, ram’s horn-like structures, characterized by a linear relationship between curvature and distance from the plus-end tip. These observations align with experimental cryo-ET images of microtubule plus-end tips in different nucleotide states. Collectively, our findings suggest that the outward bending of protofilaments at the plus-end tip is an intrinsic feature of microtubules, independent of the nucleotide state. SIGNIFICANCE: Understanding how microtubules change shape is crucial for elucidating key cellular processes such as cell division and shape maintenance, which are fundamental to both physiological function and disease progression. This study supports the concept that the microtubule plus-end tip relaxation does not align with models that couple shape changes to GTP hydrolysis, at least for the topmost tubulin heterodimers. By interfacing bottom-up multiscale modeling — using the longest reported atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of microtubule tips— with existing cryo-ET data, it is shown that protofilament bending operates independently of nucleotide hydrolysis and likely depolymerization. These findings highlight the need for a new conceptual framework that separates GTP hydrolysis from microtubule tip flaring.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.05.23.655844

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 95

  1. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.005 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/nrm2774 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.4.1.527 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s42254-019-0129-0 · DOI
  5. Henty-Ridilla, J.L. , A. Rankova , J.A. Eskin , K. Kenny , and B.L. Goode . 2016. Accelerated actin filament polymerization from microtubule plus ends. Science ( 1979 ). 352:1004–1009. · DOI
  6. 10.1083/jcb.142.1.181 · DOI
  7. 10.1083/jcb.200707042 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/ncb2975 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/s41467-021-22985-5 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/312237a0 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1437 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/B978-0-12-381047-2.00001-3 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41580-018-0067-1 · DOI
  14. 10.1021/bi00664a018 · DOI
  15. 10.1146/annurev.bb.21.060192.001045 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00243-8 · DOI
  17. 10.1091/mbc.7.4.663 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.068 · DOI
  19. 10.1083/jcb.201802138 · DOI
  20. 10.1073/pnas.2305899120 · DOI
  21. 10.1083/jcb.114.5.977 · DOI
  22. 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3661 · DOI
  23. 10.1021/bi00449a028 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0959-440X(03)00029-0 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.0801155105 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/s41594-018-0087-8 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.04.046 · DOI
  28. 10.1091/mbc.E07-07-0681 · DOI
  29. 10.1242/jcs.072967 · DOI
  30. 10.1083/jcb.201209154 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/s41467-020-17553-2 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/s41580-021-00399-x · DOI
  33. 10.1083/jcb.202208062 · DOI
  34. Kalutskii, M. , H. Grubmüller , V.A. Volkov , and M. Igaev . 2024. Microtubule dynamics are defined by conformations and stability of clustered protofilaments.. · DOI
  35. 10.1021/bi060334m · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.str.2010.12.020 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.07.029 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/s41467-023-41615-w · DOI
  39. 10.1128/mbio.02267-16 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Wagstaff, J.M. , V.J. Planelles-Herrero , G. Sharov , A. Alnami , F. Kozielski , E. Derivery , and J. Löwe . 2023. Diverse cytomotive actins and tubulins share a polymerization switch mechanism conferring robust dynamics. Sci Adv. 9:eadf3021. · DOI
  41. 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.153 · DOI
  42. 10.1073/pnas.2115516119 · DOI
  43. Ogunmolu, F.E. , S. Moradi , V.A. Volkov , C. van Hoorn , J. Wu , N. Andrea , S. Hua , K. Jiang , I. Vakonakis , M. Potočnjak , and others. 2021. Microtubule plus-end regulation by centriolar cap proteins. bioRxiv. 2021–2028. · DOI
  44. 10.1083/jcb.129.5.1311 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/ncb3412 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.cels.2020.09.008 · DOI
  47. 10.1073/pnas.1802637115 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 2006, Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using Modeller, Curr Protoc Bioinformatics, 15, 5.6.1
  49. 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.04.028 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1002/jcc.20291 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/nmeth.4067 · DOI
  53. 10.1063/1.464397 · DOI
  54. 10.1063/1.328693 · DOI
  55. Bussi, G. , D. Donadio , and M. Parrinello . 2007. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J Chem Phys. 126. · DOI
  56. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-130348 · DOI
  57. 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01053 · DOI
  58. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c04473 · DOI
  59. 10.1063/1.436761 · DOI
  60. 10.1186/2046-1682-4-1 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.trechm.2019.07.008 · DOI
  62. 2010, Hydrodynamic effects in proteins, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 23, 33102
  63. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Skolnick, J . 2016. Perspective: On the importance of hydrodynamic interactions in the subcellular dynamics of macromolecules. J Chem Phys. 145. · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.07.015 · DOI
  66. Szymczak, P. , and M. Cieplak . 2007. Proteins in a shear flow. J Chem Phys. 127. · DOI
  67. Waszkiewicz, R. , M. Bartczak , K. Kolasa , and M. Lisicki . 2023. Pychastic: Precise Brownian dynamics using Taylor-Itō integrators in Python. SciPost Physics Codebases. 11. · DOI
  68. 10.1017/jfm.2013.668 · DOI
  69. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1126/science.1615323 · DOI
  71. 10.2174/138920310791330596 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/0301-0104(95)00357-6 · DOI
  73. Noid, W.G . 2013. Perspective: Coarse-grained models for biomolecular systems. J Chem Phys. 139. · DOI
  74. 10.1007/s10955-017-1944-2 · DOI
  75. 10.1107/S0108767305015266 · DOI
  76. 10.1002/jcc.21787 · DOI
  77. Gowers, R. , M. Linke , J. Barnoud , T. Reddy , M. Melo , S. Seyler , J. Domański , D. Dotson , S. Buchoux , I. Kenney , and O. Beckstein . 2016. MDAnalysis: A Python Package for the Rapid Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Simulations. . pp. 98–105. · DOI
  78. 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013 · DOI
  79. 10.1016/S1574-1400(09)00502-7 · DOI
  80. 10.1080/15459624.2015.1044603 · DOI
  81. 10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Newey, W.K. , and K.D. West . 1986. A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelationconsistent covariance matrix. NBER Technical Paper. 55. · DOI
  83. 10.1038/ncomms4094 · DOI
  84. 10.1021/bi900200q · DOI
  85. 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.031933 · DOI
  86. 10.1371/journal.pone.0029049 · DOI
  87. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004584 · DOI
  88. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80961-7 · DOI
  89. 10.7554/eLife.51992 · DOI
  90. 10.1242/jcs.96.4.571 · DOI
  91. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.048 · DOI
  92. 10.1371/journal.pone.0247022 · DOI
  93. González, M.A. , and J.L.F. Abascal . 2010. The shear viscosity of rigid water models. J Chem Phys. 132. · DOI
  94. 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.10.009 · DOI
  95. 10.1007/s12195-013-0292-9 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Skóra, T., Wu, J., Beckett, D., Xue, W., Voth, G. A., & Bidone, T. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Bidone, Tamara C.
ORCID
Venue
Biophysical Journal
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-05-26
Volume
125
Issue
2
Pages
406-419
ISSN
0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1101/2025.05.23.655844
PMC
PMC12154965
OpenAlex
W4412031355
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
United States National Institute of General Medical Sciences (F32 GM140646)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Keywords
GTP hydrolysis, microtubule lattice, allosteric model, lattice model, cytoskeletal dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review