The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Phylogenetically-informed crayfish conservation in the face of climate change
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1111/acv.70040 · Paper page
Abstract
Crayfish are an ancient clade of freshwater decapods that play vital and diverse ecological roles in the freshwater systems that they inhabit. One third of assessed crayfish species are threatened with extinction and 87% are highly sensitive to climate change. However, the extent to which the evolutionary history of crayfish is threatened, especially by climate change, remains unclear. To address this, we produced a phylogenetically-informed species prioritisation for the conservation of crayfish and explored the consequences of projected climate change scenarios on crayfish phylogenetic diversity. We used the EDGE2 metric to highlight 70 priority species for conservation. Their combined threatened evolutionary history accounts for 40.7% of the expected phylogenetic diversity loss for all 673 crayfish. Of these priority species, 45.7% are vulnerable to climate change, with the majority (32 species) located in Australia. Under a high warming scenario, individual species that are more evolutionarily distinct are projected to be disproportionately affected. The extinction of climate change vulnerable species could cause the loss of up to 26.3% more phylogenetic diversity than the random expectation, equivalent to 409 million years of evolutionary history. Our results highlight the need to consider climate change effects on phylogenetic diversity to fully understand its impact on biodiversity. If actions were taken to avoid a worst-case warming scenario in favour of an intermediate scenario, we could safeguard 251 million years of unique crayfish evolutionary history.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 2
Research works printed but not linked: 69
- 10.1002/aqc.2488 · DOI
- 2021, New species of crayfish of the genus Procambarus, and notes on Procambarus pilosimanus (Decapoda: Cambaridae) from Chiapas, Mexico. Rev. Mex, Biodivers, 92, e923833
- Balian, E.V. , Segers, H. , Martens, K. , Lévéque, C . (2007). The Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment: an overview of the results. In Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment: 627-637. Balian, E.V. , Lévêque, C. , Segers, H. , Martens, K. Dordrecht: Springer. · DOI
- 10.1111/cobi.12372 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/jcbiol/ruy100 · DOI
- 2022, More than half of data deficient species predicted to be threatened by extinction. Commun, Biol, 5, 679
- 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.494 · DOI
- Crandall, K. , Jones, J. , & Razanabolana, J. R . (2022). Parastacidae, Astacoides, Freshwater Crayfishes, Orana, Orambanonga, Orambato. In The New Natural History of Madagascar: 908–912. Goodman, S. M. Princeton: Princeton University Press. · DOI
- 10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00112-2 · DOI
- 10.1093/jcbiol/rux070 · DOI
- 10.1111/acv.12185 · DOI
- 2022, Overlooked keystone species in conservation plans of fluvial ecosystems in Southeast Europe: a review of native freshwater crayfish species, Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst, 423, 21
- Darwall, W. R. T. , & Freyhof, J . (2016). Lost fishes, who is counting? The extent of the threat to freshwater fish biodiversity. In Conservation of freshwater fishes: 1–36. Closs, G.P. , Krkosek, M. & Olden, J. D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
- 10.1111/eva.13728 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1464793105006950 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01068.x · DOI
- 10.3390/biology1030906 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0065427 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00222933.2018.1557271 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2014.0002 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-018-23276-8 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01455.x · DOI
- 2011, An assessment of the distribution, biology, threatening processes and conservation status of the freshwater crayfish, genus Euastacus (Decapoda, Parastacidae), in continental Australia. I. Biological background and current status. Crustac, Monogr, 15, 241
- 2020, Two new species of burrowing crayfish in the genus Lacunicambarus (Decapoda: Cambaridae) from Alabama and Mississippi, Zootaxa, 4802, 401
- 2019, Lacunicambarus chimera: a new species of burrowing crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae) from Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, and Tennessee, Zootaxa, 4544, 451
- 2019, Lacunicambarus dalyae: a new species of burrowing crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae) from the southeastern United States, Zootaxa, 4683, 361
- 2016, Phylogenetic approaches reveal biodiversity threats under climate change. Nat, Clim. Change, 6, 1110
- 2023, Indicators to monitor the status of the tree of life. Conserv, Biol, 37, e14138
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001991 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0194680 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-024-45119-z · DOI
- 10.1177/0309133311409092 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00947.x · DOI
- 10.1111/ddi.12831 · DOI
- 10.1111/ddi.12218 · DOI
- 2018, New endemic species of freshwater crayfish Parastacus Huxley, 1879 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Parastacidae) from the Atlantic forest in southern Brazil, Nauplius, 26, 2018015
- 2020, A new species of burrowing crayfish in genus Parastacus Huxley, 1879 (Decapoda, Parastacidae) from the Sinos River Basin, Southern Brazil, Zool. Stud, 59, 1
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0043912 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0000296 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.011 · DOI
- 2018, The subgenus Ortmannicus (Decapoda: Cambaridae) in Texas, with descriptions of new species, Zootaxa, 4468, 1
- 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01766.x · DOI
- 2019, Cambarus fetzneri sp. nov., a new species of burrowing crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae) from the Allegheny Mountains of Virginia and West Virginia, USA, Zootaxa, 4651, 38
- 2018, Cambarus polypilosus, a new species of stream-dwelling crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae) from the Western Highland Rim of Tennessee, USA, Zootaxa, 4403, 171
- 10.3897/zookeys.769.26095 · DOI
- 2017, The marbled crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae) represents an independent new species, Zootaxa, 4363, 544
- 2021, Maximum levels of global phylogenetic diversity efficiently capture plant services for humankind. Nat, Ecol. Evol, 5, 583
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0003700 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rstb.2014.0009 · DOI
- 2017, Cherax acherontis (Decapoda: parastacidae), the first cave crayfish from the Southern Hemisphere (Papua Province, Indonesia), Zootaxa, 4363, 137
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv277 · DOI
- Pedraza-Lara, C. , Ortiz-Herrera, H. S. , & Jones, R. W. (2021). A new species of crayfish of the genus Cambarellus (Decapoda: Cambaridae) from central Mexico. Rev. Mex. Biodiv. 92, e923150. · DOI
- 2019, Cambarus franklini, a new crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae) from the Catawba River Basin in western North Carolina, USA, Zootaxa, 4568, 520
- 10.1038/s41467-024-51992-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcz.2019.01.006 · DOI
- 2011, The assessment of the habitat and water quality requirements of the stone crayfish (Austropotamobius torrentium) and noble crayfish (Astacus astacus) species in the rivers from the Anina Mountains (SW Romania), Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst, 401, 03
- 10.1111/BRV.12480 · DOI · Paper page
- 2013, Ecological roles of crayfish in freshwater and terrestrial habitats, Freshw. Crayfish, 19, 197
- 10.1098/rstb.2014.0060 · DOI
- 10.1177/117693430700300024 · DOI
- 2018, Global priorities for conserving the evolutionary history of sharks, rays and chimaeras. Nat, Ecol. Evol, 2, 288
- 10.1111/evo.13326 · DOI
- 2018, Two new species of freshwater crayfish of the genus Faxonius (Decapoda: Cambaridae) from the Ozark Highlands of Arkansas and Missouri, Zootaxa, 4399, 491
- 10.1007/s10750-019-04066-3 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02374.x · DOI
- 10.1111/cobi.13022 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature09440 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2000.tb00240.x · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Pipins, S., Böhm, M., Bland, L., Crandall, K. A., Hossain, M. A., Rosindell, J., & Gumbs, R.
- Affiliations
- Zoological Society of London (GB)
- Deakin University (AU)
- Smithsonian Institution (US)
- School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia
- International Union for Conservation of Nature (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pipins, Sebastian
- Venue
- Animal Conservation
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-06-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 274-284
- ISSN
- 1367-9430 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7130555191
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Animal Conservation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Oulun Yliopisto
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/S007415/, NE/S007415/1)
- Research England
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Keywords
- crayfish, climate change, phylogenetic diversity, conservation prioritization, evolutionary distinctiveness, extinction risk, freshwater decapods, species prioritization, warming scenarios
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review