The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate Protein-Protein Interactions Modeling through Physics-informed Geometric Invariant Learning
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s42003-026-09809-2
Abstract
AlphaFold has set a new standard for predicting protein structures from primary sequences; however, it faces challenges with protein complexes across species, engineered proteins, and antigen-antibody, where co-evolutionary signals may be sparse or missing. Herein, we present ProTact, a SE(3)-invariant geometric graph neural network that integrates physics-informed geometric complementarity and trigonometric constraints as robust inductive biases to enhance protein-protein contact predictions. ProTact is applicable to both experimental and predicted monomer structures and utilizes a modulated key point matching algorithm to approximate accurate docking poses. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that ProTact consistently outperforms state-of-the-art sequence-based and structure-based methods on benchmark datasets, achieving notable relative improvements of 31.63% in Precision@10 for CASP 13 and 14 targets, and 31.94% for DIPS-Plus datasets. Moreover, when combined with AlphaFold3 as re-scoring functions, ProTact surpasses its default confidence scores, offering over 30.48% improvements in the low-MSA contexts. We anticipate that the proposed framework will advance our understanding of protein interactions, functions, and design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90352-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-022-28865-w · DOI · Paper page
- Lu, H. , Zhou, Q. , He, J. , Jiang, Z. , Peng, C. , Tong, R. , Shi, J .: Recent advances in the development of protein–protein interactions modulators: mechanisms and clinical trials. Signal transduction and targeted therapy 5(1), 213 (2020) · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrd1343 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/mas.21574 · DOI
- 10.1517/17460441.2011.603722 · DOI
- 10.1002/wcms.45 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
- Abramson, J. , Adler, J. , Dunger, J. , Evans, R. , Green, T. , Pritzel, A. , Ronneberger, O. , Willmore, L. , Ballard, A.J. , Bambrick, J. , et al.: Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with alphafold 3. Nature, 1–3 (2024) · DOI
- Krishna, R. , Wang, J. , Ahern, W. , Sturmfels, P. , Venkatesh, P. , Kalvet, I. , Lee, G.R. , Morey-Burrows, F.S. , Anishchenko, I. , Humphreys, I.R. , et al.: Generalized biomolecular modeling and design with rosettafold all-atom. Science 384(6693), 2528 (2024) · DOI · Paper page
- Liu, L. , Zhang, S. , Xue, Y. , Ye, X. , Zhu, K. , Li, Y. , Liu, Y. , Zhang, X. , Fang, X .: Technical report of helixfold3 for biomolecular structure prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.16975 (2024) · arXiv
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41594-021-00714-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Feng, S. , Chen, Z. , Zhang, C. , Xie, Y. , Ovchinnikov, S. , Gao, Y.Q. , Liu, S .: Integrated structure prediction of protein–protein docking with experimental restraints using colabdock. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1–12 (2024) · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu097 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41596-020-0312-x · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-023-01704-z · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky420 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty647 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-022-34600-2 · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbac499 · DOI
- Morehead, A. , Chen, C. , Cheng, J. : Geometric transformers for protein interface contact prediction. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2022). https://openreview.net/forum?id=CS4463zx6Hi
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab761 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1606762113 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1607570113 · DOI
- 10.1016/J.SBI.2017.10.014 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Tankbind: Trigonometry-aware neural networks for drug-protein binding structure prediction, Advances in neural information processing systems, 35, 7236
- 10.1038/s42256-023-00741-2 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41597-023-02409-3 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.25838 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.26222 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.92184 · DOI · Paper page
- He, K. , Zhang, X. , Ren, S. , Sun, J .: Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 770–778 (2016) · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · DOI · Paper page
- Geiger, M. , Smidt, T. : e3nn: Euclidean neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.09453 (2022) · arXiv
- 10.1038/s41592-022-01490-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Sverrisson, F. , Feydy, J. , Correia, B.E. , Bronstein, M.M .: Fast end-to-end learning on protein surfaces. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 15272–15281 (2021) · DOI
- 2017, Least-squares rigid motion using svd, Computing, 1, 1
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102344 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr638 · DOI
- 2021, Accurate prediction of inter-protein residue– residue contacts for homo-oligomeric protein complexes, Briefings in bioinformatics, 22, 038
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0161879 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Rao, J., Liu, D., Zhou, X., Yuan, Q., Wei, W., Lu, W., Zhang, J., Rong, Y., Yang, Y., & Zheng, S.
- Affiliations
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- Alibaba DAMO Academy (China) (CN)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Yuedong
- Zheng, Shuangjia
- Venue
- Communications Biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-07-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC13194811
- OpenAlex
- W7141422937
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62402314, 2020YFB0204803, 2019B020228001, 62041209, 12126610)
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
- Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality ((24510714300)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- protein-protein interaction, protein docking, protein complexes, antigen-antibody reaction, feature point matching
- MeSH terms
- Graph Neural Networks, Algorithms, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Computational Biology, Protein Interaction Mapping
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review