PreprintCited by 1Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accurate Protein-Protein Interactions Modeling through Physics-informed Geometric Invariant Learning

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s42003-026-09809-2

Abstract

AlphaFold has set a new standard for predicting protein structures from primary sequences; however, it faces challenges with protein complexes across species, engineered proteins, and antigen-antibody, where co-evolutionary signals may be sparse or missing. Herein, we present ProTact, a SE(3)-invariant geometric graph neural network that integrates physics-informed geometric complementarity and trigonometric constraints as robust inductive biases to enhance protein-protein contact predictions. ProTact is applicable to both experimental and predicted monomer structures and utilizes a modulated key point matching algorithm to approximate accurate docking poses. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that ProTact consistently outperforms state-of-the-art sequence-based and structure-based methods on benchmark datasets, achieving notable relative improvements of 31.63% in Precision@10 for CASP 13 and 14 targets, and 31.94% for DIPS-Plus datasets. Moreover, when combined with AlphaFold3 as re-scoring functions, ProTact surpasses its default confidence scores, offering over 30.48% improvements in the low-MSA contexts. We anticipate that the proposed framework will advance our understanding of protein interactions, functions, and design.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.07.01.662544

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90352-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/s41467-022-28865-w · DOI · Paper page
  3. Lu, H. , Zhou, Q. , He, J. , Jiang, Z. , Peng, C. , Tong, R. , Shi, J .: Recent advances in the development of protein–protein interactions modulators: mechanisms and clinical trials. Signal transduction and targeted therapy 5(1), 213 (2020) · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/nrd1343 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1002/mas.21574 · DOI
  6. 10.1517/17460441.2011.603722 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/wcms.45 · DOI
  8. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Abramson, J. , Adler, J. , Dunger, J. , Evans, R. , Green, T. , Pritzel, A. , Ronneberger, O. , Willmore, L. , Ballard, A.J. , Bambrick, J. , et al.: Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with alphafold 3. Nature, 1–3 (2024) · DOI
  11. Krishna, R. , Wang, J. , Ahern, W. , Sturmfels, P. , Venkatesh, P. , Kalvet, I. , Lee, G.R. , Morey-Burrows, F.S. , Anishchenko, I. , Humphreys, I.R. , et al.: Generalized biomolecular modeling and design with rosettafold all-atom. Science 384(6693), 2528 (2024) · DOI · Paper page
  12. Liu, L. , Zhang, S. , Xue, Y. , Ye, X. , Zhu, K. , Li, Y. , Liu, Y. , Zhang, X. , Fang, X .: Technical report of helixfold3 for biomolecular structure prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.16975 (2024) · arXiv
  13. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac016 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/s41594-021-00714-2 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Feng, S. , Chen, Z. , Zhang, C. , Xie, Y. , Ovchinnikov, S. , Gao, Y.Q. , Liu, S .: Integrated structure prediction of protein–protein docking with experimental restraints using colabdock. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1–12 (2024) · DOI
  16. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu097 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/s41596-020-0312-x · DOI
  18. 10.1038/s41587-023-01704-z · DOI
  19. 10.1093/nar/gky420 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty647 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/s41467-022-34600-2 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/bib/bbac499 · DOI
  23. Morehead, A. , Chen, C. , Cheng, J. : Geometric transformers for protein interface contact prediction. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2022). https://openreview.net/forum?id=CS4463zx6Hi
  24. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab761 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1073/pnas.1606762113 · DOI
  26. 10.1073/pnas.1607570113 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/J.SBI.2017.10.014 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 2022, Tankbind: Trigonometry-aware neural networks for drug-protein binding structure prediction, Advances in neural information processing systems, 35, 7236
  29. 10.1038/s42256-023-00741-2 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41597-023-02409-3 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/prot.25838 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1002/prot.26222 · DOI
  33. 10.7554/eLife.92184 · DOI · Paper page
  34. He, K. , Zhang, X. , Ren, S. , Sun, J .: Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 770–778 (2016) · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Geiger, M. , Smidt, T. : e3nn: Euclidean neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.09453 (2022) · arXiv
  37. 10.1038/s41592-022-01490-7 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Sverrisson, F. , Feydy, J. , Correia, B.E. , Bronstein, M.M .: Fast end-to-end learning on protein surfaces. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 15272–15281 (2021) · DOI
  39. 2017, Least-squares rigid motion using svd, Computing, 1, 1
  40. 10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102344 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr638 · DOI
  42. 2021, Accurate prediction of inter-protein residue– residue contacts for homo-oligomeric protein complexes, Briefings in bioinformatics, 22, 038
  43. 10.1371/journal.pone.0161879 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Rao, J., Liu, D., Zhou, X., Yuan, Q., Wei, W., Lu, W., Zhang, J., Rong, Y., Yang, Y., & Zheng, S.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Alibaba DAMO Academy (China) (CN)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Yang, Yuedong
  • Zheng, Shuangjia
Venue
Communications Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-07-04
Volume
9
Issue
1
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7141422937
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62402314, 2020YFB0204803, 2019B020228001, 62041209, 12126610)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
  • Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality ((24510714300)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, protein docking, protein complexes, antigen-antibody reaction, feature point matching
MeSH terms
Graph Neural Networks, Algorithms, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Computational Biology, Protein Interaction Mapping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review