PreprintCited by 2Cystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesProtein Structure and DynamicsIon channel regulation and function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of Disease-Causing Mutations and Ivacaftor on the Dynamics of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Protein

Open access
Veselu, Diana-F., Shoemark, Deborah K., van der Kamp, Marc W.·2025·Journal of Computational Biophysics and Chemistry

Preprint — published as 10.1142/s2737416526400077

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis (CF), one of the most common life-shortening autosomal recessive diseases, arises from mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene and leads to severe respiratory and digestive dysfunction. CFTR-targeting therapies such as ivacaftor have transformed CF care by directly modulating CFTR function. However, the precise mechanism by which ivacaftor alters CFTR’s conformational dynamics remains incompletely understood. In this study, we refined and employed a CFTR model derived from the phosphorylated, ATP- and ivacaftor-bound cryo-EM structure (PDB ID 6O2P). Through 32.5 μs of molecular dynamics simulations, we investigated the structural and dynamic effects of the common F508del mutation and the gating mutations G551D, G1349D and S549N. Our results show that mutations within the ATP-binding regions cause local rearrangements at the nucleotide-binding sites, affecting the interface between the nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs) relative to wild-type CFTR, rather than abolishing ATP binding entirely. We further indicate that, for the NBDs to approach one another productively, protonation of the aspartate side chains in G551D and G1349D CFTR is necessary to mitigate charge repulsion. The F508del mutation induces increased rigidity within the protein core, impeding the rearrangement of transmembrane helices required for channel opening. Ivacaftor does not directly perturb the ATP-binding sites, consistent with emerging evidence that it exerts its effects allosterically on regions distal to the nucleotide-binding sites. Collectively, our findings enhance our understanding of CFTR dynamics and provide a versatile framework for exploring the molecular effects of disease-causing mutations and evaluating potential therapeutic agents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.07.07.663434

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. 10.1007/s00018-016-2391-y · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nrdp.2015.10 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nature04712 · DOI
  4. 10.1152/physrev.00007.2018 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.biocel.2014.04.001 · DOI
  6. Veselu, D.-F .; Yeh, H.-I. ; Rodrat, M. ; Bradbury, J. D. ; Manzanares Fornies, Y. ; Li, H. ; Shoemark, D. K. ; Oliveira, A. S. F. ; Hwang, T.-C. ; Sheppard, D. N . Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR)-Targeted Therapeutics for Cystic Fibrosis. In Ion Channels as Targets in Drug Discovery, Stephens, G. , Stevens, E . Eds.; Springer International Publishing, 2024; pp 239–284. · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.014 · DOI
  8. 10.1126/science.aaw7611 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.ade2216 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.024 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.1815287115 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/wcms.1393 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/protein/gzq004 · DOI
  14. 10.1021/ct100578z · DOI
  15. 10.1007/BF00228148 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1002/prot.22711 · DOI
  17. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c06386 · DOI
  18. 10.1186/1756-0500-5-367 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/jcc.20035 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/jcc.10128 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00749 · DOI
  22. 10.1039/c0cp01971b · DOI
  23. 10.1002/jcc.20945 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 · DOI
  26. 10.1063/1.448118 · DOI
  27. 10.1063/1.464397 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.06.003 · DOI
  29. 10.1063/1.2408420 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRev.159.98 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12<1463::AID-JCC4>3.3.CO;2-L · DOI
  32. 10.1063/1.328693 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/jcc.21172 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.13140/RG.2.2.31337.77924 · DOI
  37. 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00645 · DOI
  38. 10.1021/ct200133y · DOI
  39. 10.1038/nature03313 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/s41586-023-05854-7 · DOI
  41. 10.1039/C4CP01388C · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1074/jbc.M113.476226 · DOI
  43. 10.1074/jbc.274.9.5429 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/s00018-016-2389-5 · DOI
  45. 10.1073/pnas.2316673121 · DOI
  46. 10.1007/s00018-022-04621-7 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.jcf.2022.09.010 · DOI
  48. 10.1085/jgp.201711946 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.jcf.2011.12.005 · DOI
  50. 10.1085/jgp.200609667 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.041 · DOI
  52. 10.1101/2022.10.10.510913 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.02.022 · DOI
  54. 10.3390/ijms21020452 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/s41467-017-00444-4 · DOI
  56. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008889 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Al Salmani, M. K. , Rab, A. , Hong, J. S. , Li, H. , Cai, Z. , Fass, U. W. , Sorscher, E. J. , & Sheppard, D. N . Cystic fibrosis mutations at position S549 modulate CFTR Cl- channel processing, gating and responsiveness to mutation-specific therapies In Epithelia & Membrane Transport, Europhysiology 2018 Proceedings of the Physiological Society, 41, PCB113., (London, UK). 2018.
  58. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90353-R · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1085/jgp.200609516 · DOI
  60. 10.1007/s00018-021-03859-x · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Veselu, D.-F., Shoemark, D. K., & van der Kamp, M. W.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
van der Kamp, Marc W.
Venue
Journal of Computational Biophysics and Chemistry
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-07-07
Volume
25
Issue
12
Pages
3233-3250
ISSN
2737-4165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4417517765
Cited by
2
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Computational Biophysics and Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Cystic Fibrosis Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
Keywords
cystic fibrosis, CFTR, ivacaftor, F508del mutation, G551D mutation, CFTR gating mutation, nucleotide-binding domain, ATP binding, protonation, allosteric regulation, protein conformational dynamics, channel gating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review