PreprintCited by 0Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnologybioluminescence and chemiluminescence researchGene Regulatory Network Analysis

A novel biosensor for ferrous iron developed via CoBiSe: A computational method for rapid biosensor design

Open access
Papadopoulos, Athanasios, Anlauf, Manuel T., Reiners, Jens, Paik, Sueng-Hyun, Krüger, Aileen, Lückel, Benita, Bott, Michael, Drepper, Thomas +5 more·2025·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.1021/acssensors.5c02481 · Paper page

Abstract

Genetically encoded biosensors enable monitoring of metabolite dynamics in living organisms. We present CoBiSe, a computational approach using Constraint Network Analysis to identify optimal insertion sites for reporter modules in molecular recognition elements (MREs). Applied to the iron-binding protein DtxR from Corynebacterium glutamicum , CoBiSe identified a flexible connective loop (residues 138-150) for inserting the reporter module, resulting in IronSenseR, a novel ratiometric biosensor for ferrous iron (Fe²⁺). IronSenseR demonstrates high specificity for Fe²⁺ with dissociation constants of 1.55 ± 0.08 µM (FeSO 4 ) and 2.44 ± 0.28 µM (FeCl 2 ), while showing no binding to Fe³⁺ and other divalent cations. In vivo assessment in Escherichia coli , Pseudomonas putida and Corynebacterium glutamicum confirmed IronSenseR’s capability to detect changes in the intracellular iron pool. The creation of IronSenseR underlines that, by reducing search space and eliminating labor-intensive screening, CoBiSe streamlines biosensor development and enables precise creation of next-generation biosensors for diverse metabolites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.07.16.665043

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.1038/ncomms12266 · DOI
  2. 10.1371/journal.pone.0033931 · DOI
  3. Sambrook, J. , Fritsch, E. & Maniatis, T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Plainview. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, chapt 16, 66 (1989).

Authors
Papadopoulos, A., Anlauf, M. T., Reiners, J., Paik, S.-H., Krüger, A., Lückel, B., Bott, M., Drepper, T., Frunzke, J., Gohlke, H., Weidtkamp-Peters, S., Smits, S. H. J., & Gertzen, C. G. W.
Affiliations
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
Corresponding author
Smits, Sander H.J.
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-07-21
OpenAlex
W4412539260
Cited by
0
References
68
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DESY Publication Database (PUBDB) (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB1535)
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich
  • Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
genetically encoded biosensors, DtxR, iron-binding proteins, Corynebacterium glutamicum, ratiometric biosensor, molecular recognition elements, biosensor development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review