The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling Alternative Conformational States in CASP16
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/prot.70065
Abstract
The CASP16 Ensemble Prediction experiment assessed advances in methods for modeling proteins, nucleic acids, and their complexes in multiple conformational states. Targets included systems with experimental structures determined in two or three states, evaluated by direct comparison to experimental coordinates, as well as domain–linker–domain (D–L–D) targets assessed against statistical models from NMR and SAXS data. This paper focuses on the former class of multi-state targets. Ten ensembles were released as community challenges, including ligand-induced conformational changes, protein–DNA complexes, a trimeric protein, a stem-loop RNA, and multiple oligomeric states of a single RNA. For five targets, some groups produced reasonably accurate models of both reference states (best TM-score >0.75). However, with the exception of one protein–ligand complex (T1214), where an apo structure was available as a template, predictors generally failed to capture key structural details distinguishing the states. Overall, accuracy was significantly lower than for single-state targets in other CASP experiments. The most successful approaches generated multiple AlphaFold2 models using enhanced multiple sequence alignments and sampling protocols, followed by model quality based selection. While the AlphaFold3 server performed well on several targets, individual groups outperformed it in specific cases. By contrast, predictions for one protein–DNA complex, three RNA targets, and multiple oligomeric RNA states consistently fell short (TM-score <0.75). These results highlight both progress and persistent challenges in multi-state prediction. Despite recent advances, accurate modeling of conformational ensembles, particularly RNA and large multimeric assemblies, remains a critical frontier for structural biology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Predicting multiple conformations via sequence clustering and AlphaFold2
Wayment-Steele, H. K., Ojoawo, A., Otten, R., Apitz, J. M., Pitsawong, W., Hömberger, M., Ovchinnikov, S., Colwell, L., & Kern, D. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06832-9 · Cited by 545
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- 10.1002/prot.26237 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.26617 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.26584 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/10.1101/2025.04.27.650885 · DOI
- 10.1002/10.1002/prot.26833 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102703 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01127 · DOI
- 10.1021/ar500340a · DOI
- 10.1021/ja3001419 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0308641101 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.06.022 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.04.004 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.4133 · DOI
- 10.1002/10.1101/2024.06.04.597491 · DOI
- 10.1128/microbiolspec.mdna1123-0059-2014 · DOI
- 10.1002/10.1101/2025.01.03.631226 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1112064 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkx1309 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0604062103 · DOI
- 10.1002/10.1038/s42003-023-05610-7 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkx407 · DOI
- 10.1002/10.1101/2025.04.15.649049 · DOI
- 10.1002/10.1038/s41564-025-02075-8 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0161879 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/10.4161/rna.9.1.18178 · DOI
- 10.1002/10.1101/2025.02.20.639096 · DOI
- 10.1002/10.1101/2025.05.06.652459 · DOI
- 10.1002/10.7554/eLife.75751 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac202 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-024-51801-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01936 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-024-51507-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/10.1038/s42003-025-07791-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102973 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2412719121 · DOI
- 10.1002/10.1101/2024.07.15.603529 · DOI
- 10.1002/10.1101/2025.02.18.638828 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.24399 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.70042 · DOI
- 10.1002/10.1038/s41592-022-01585-1 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkg571 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/10.1038/s42004-023-00991-6 · DOI
- 10.1002/10.1038/s42003-023-05525-3 · DOI
- 10.1002/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI
- 10.1038/S41586-024-07487-W · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/10.1038/nmeth.1818 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-11-431 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Dube, N., Ramelot, T. A., Benavides, T. L., Huang, Y. J., Moult, J., Kryshtafovych, A., & Montelione, G. T.
- Affiliations
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
- Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ramelot, Theresa A.
- Montelione, Gaetano T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-09-02
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 330-347
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12424773
- OpenAlex
- W4415621313
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM141818, R01GM100482)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- conformational ensembles, protein-DNA complex, ligand-induced conformational change, trimeric protein, stem-loop RNA, AlphaFold2, AlphaFold3, model selection, TM-score
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review