PreprintCited by 9Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modeling Alternative Conformational States in CASP16

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1002/prot.70065

Abstract

The CASP16 Ensemble Prediction experiment assessed advances in methods for modeling proteins, nucleic acids, and their complexes in multiple conformational states. Targets included systems with experimental structures determined in two or three states, evaluated by direct comparison to experimental coordinates, as well as domain–linker–domain (D–L–D) targets assessed against statistical models from NMR and SAXS data. This paper focuses on the former class of multi-state targets. Ten ensembles were released as community challenges, including ligand-induced conformational changes, protein–DNA complexes, a trimeric protein, a stem-loop RNA, and multiple oligomeric states of a single RNA. For five targets, some groups produced reasonably accurate models of both reference states (best TM-score >0.75). However, with the exception of one protein–ligand complex (T1214), where an apo structure was available as a template, predictors generally failed to capture key structural details distinguishing the states. Overall, accuracy was significantly lower than for single-state targets in other CASP experiments. The most successful approaches generated multiple AlphaFold2 models using enhanced multiple sequence alignments and sampling protocols, followed by model quality based selection. While the AlphaFold3 server performed well on several targets, individual groups outperformed it in specific cases. By contrast, predictions for one protein–DNA complex, three RNA targets, and multiple oligomeric RNA states consistently fell short (TM-score <0.75). These results highlight both progress and persistent challenges in multi-state prediction. Despite recent advances, accurate modeling of conformational ensembles, particularly RNA and large multimeric assemblies, remains a critical frontier for structural biology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.09.02.673835

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.1002/prot.26237 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/prot.26617 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1002/prot.26584 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1002/10.1101/2025.04.27.650885 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/10.1002/prot.26833 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102703 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1002/10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01127 · DOI
  8. 10.1021/ar500340a · DOI
  9. 10.1021/ja3001419 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.0308641101 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.06.022 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.04.004 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/pro.4133 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/10.1101/2024.06.04.597491 · DOI
  15. 10.1128/microbiolspec.mdna1123-0059-2014 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/10.1101/2025.01.03.631226 · DOI
  17. 10.1126/science.1112064 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/nar/gkx1309 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1073/pnas.0604062103 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/10.1038/s42003-023-05610-7 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/nar/gkx407 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/10.1101/2025.04.15.649049 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/10.1038/s41564-025-02075-8 · DOI
  25. 10.1371/journal.pone.0161879 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1002/10.4161/rna.9.1.18178 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/10.1101/2025.02.20.639096 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/10.1101/2025.05.06.652459 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/10.7554/eLife.75751 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac202 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1038/s41467-024-51801-z · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01936 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1038/s41467-024-51507-2 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1002/10.1038/s42003-025-07791-9 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102973 · DOI
  36. 10.1073/pnas.2412719121 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/10.1101/2024.07.15.603529 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/10.1101/2025.02.18.638828 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/prot.24399 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/prot.70042 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/10.1038/s41592-022-01585-1 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/nar/gkg571 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1002/10.1038/s42004-023-00991-6 · DOI
  45. 10.1002/10.1038/s42003-023-05525-3 · DOI
  46. 10.1002/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/S41586-024-07487-W · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1002/10.1038/nmeth.1818 · DOI
  49. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-431 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Dube, N., Ramelot, T. A., Benavides, T. L., Huang, Y. J., Moult, J., Kryshtafovych, A., & Montelione, G. T.
Affiliations
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
  • Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ramelot, Theresa A.
  • Montelione, Gaetano T.
Venue
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-09-02
Volume
94
Issue
1
Pages
330-347
ISSN
0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415621313
Cited by
9
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM141818, R01GM100482)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
conformational ensembles, protein-DNA complex, ligand-induced conformational change, trimeric protein, stem-loop RNA, AlphaFold2, AlphaFold3, model selection, TM-score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review